Utah lawmakers stand by gender care ban after study refutes reasoning


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Study findings

Two years after Utah banned gender-affirming care for minors, the state’s health department released a study finding positive mental health and body image outcomes linked to such treatments.

Utah’s ban

Utah’s 2023 law restricts hormone therapy and sex change surgeries for minors, imposes licensing and malpractice rules on providers, and bans treatment for new patients diagnosed after a cutoff date.

What could happen next

Utah’s Department of Health and Human Services recommends creating a certified expert board to oversee gender-affirming care if the ban is reconsidered.


Full story

Two years after Utah banned gender-affirming care for minors, state health officials have released findings that undercut key arguments made by lawmakers who supported the law. The Department of Health and Human Services, tasked with studying the potential risks to children, found little evidence to back claims that such treatments are inherently harmful.

What is Utah’s law on gender-affirming care? 

As of 2023, the law prohibits providers from treating new patients who were not diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a certain date and bans sex change surgeries on minors. The law also bans hormone therapy, such as puberty blockers, for minors. 

It allows individuals to bring medical malpractice claims related to these treatments and extends the statute of limitations for such claims. Doctors who continue to provide this form of treatment could lose their license and face criminal charges. 

What did the study find? 

Utah enacted SB 16 and tasked the state’s Department of Health and Human Services with reviewing medical evidence to assess the safety and potential risks of hormone treatments for transgender minors.

The University of Utah College of Pharmacy’s Drug Regimen Review Center (DRRC) conducted the study on behalf of the state and released its findings on May 19 in a 1,000-page report. 

Researchers compiled information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) along with more than 28,000 transgender minors in 134 different clinical studies. For this study, “children” are those who haven’t started puberty, while “adolescents” have begun puberty.

The study found that gender-affirming care for minors was linked to positive outcomes over time. Mental health improved, with gains in psychological functioning, reduced emotional and behavioral issues and increased self-worth. The study also reported better body image, including reduced gender dysphoria and dissatisfaction with primary and secondary sex characteristics.

The study found increased mortality risks among transgender men and women who received hormone therapy, with higher risks observed in transgender women. The leading causes of death were suicide, non-natural causes and HIV/AIDS. However, individuals who received care at a gender clinic before the age of 18 had a lower risk of suicide compared to those who were referred as adults.

What do GOP Utah lawmakers say? 

The House sponsor of Utah’s 2023 ban and the current chair of the health committee said they have no plans to lift the restriction on gender-affirming care. 

In a joint statement to The Associated Press, Republican Reps. Katy Hall and Bridger Bolinder said,  “Simply put, the science isn’t there, the risks are real, and the public is with us.”

Senate President Stuart Adams has opposed gender-affirming care for minors, but told the AP he plans to review the new study.

“That is why Utah enacted a law to safeguard the long-term health and well-being of minors while providing time to carefully examine the evolving medical landscape surrounding novel and irreversible procedures for minors. I appreciate the Utah Department of Health and Human Services for evaluating the available evidence,” he said. 

What is Utah’s health agency recommending? 

The Utah Department of Health and Human Services is not recommending the removal of the treatment ban but has provided guidance if the state chooses to do so.

Utah’s DHHS suggests creating a treatment board through DHHS and the Department of Commerce to set care standards, certify providers and provide overall oversight. Only experts will be allowed to provide care, which must provide both mental and physical health support. They’ll also require clear, detailed informed consent from both parents and minors. Several states permit minors to receive gender-affirming care without parental consent.

What does the public say? 

In a February 2025 survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, at least 56% of Americans expressed support for banning doctors from providing treatments that assist minors in changing their gender. The research firm surveyed 5,097 U.S. adults to determine how Americans’ views have shifted over the years. 

In 2024, Gallup’s survey found 51% of Americans were against someone changing their gender. However, 44% said that, morally, it was acceptable to do so. According to their findings, over 6 in 10 adults were in opposition to banning gender-affirming care for anyone under 18. 

Utah’s findings differ from the federal government

On May 1, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a review of treating children medically who have gender dysphoria.

According to HHS, the review was based on evidence-based medicine, which examined treatments such as puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for minors. The findings highlight potential risks, including some irreversible effects like infertility. It also notes that evidence of benefits remains limited.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

This study and Utah’s law highlight the ongoing debate about how best to care for transgender minors, comparing benefits of gender-affirming treatments with concerns about safety, ethics and long-term outcomes.

Medical evidence

The Utah Department of Health and Human Services study compiled clinical data and found positive mental health outcomes for transgender minors receiving gender-affirming care, which contrasts with some claims of inherent harm.

Legislative action

Utah's law bans gender-affirming care for minors and outlines significant legal and professional consequences for providers, shaping health care practices and access in the state.

Public and policy debate

Divergent opinions from lawmakers, shifting public attitudes, and differing findings from state and federal agencies underscore ongoing controversy and the evolving nature of policy and perceptions around care for transgender youth.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 17 media outlets

Community reaction

Local responses are mixed. Some Utah Republicans remain steadfast in keeping the ban on gender-affirming care, stating concerns over youth making life-altering decisions. Others, including Democratic leaders and LGBTQ+ advocates, urge lawmakers to reconsider the law based on the new report’s findings, reflecting growing advocacy for transgender youth in the state.

Context corner

The debate over gender-affirming care occurs against a backdrop of national and state-level legislative battles on transgender rights. Utah’s 2023 ban was intended as a temporary moratorium until more local research was available. This mirrors wider trends, as over half of U.S. states consider or have enacted similar bans, reflecting deep divides in American political and cultural attitudes toward transgender health care.

History lesson

Previous state bans on gender-affirming care have faced legal challenges—Arkansas, Florida, and Montana saw their bans struck down as unconstitutional, though some appeals are pending. Historically, professional medical consensus in the U.S. has moved towards supporting gender-affirming care, with decades of experience indicating it can help alleviate mental health issues for transgender youth.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Utah ban on gender-affirming care as harmful and politically motivated, emphasizing the contradiction between lawmakers’ claims and their own study that shows positive mental health outcomes, often using charged terms like "harmful" and linking the issue to systemic racism and "fascism.
  • Media outlets in the center take a procedural tone, neutrally presenting the moratorium and bipartisan debate without emotive language.
  • Media outlets on the right stress caution, underscoring "weak evidence" and "real risks," framing restrictions as protective and aligned with public concern, frequently invoking terms like "risks" and emphasizing the sufficiency of behavioral therapy over medical intervention.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

14 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Utah lawmakers passed a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in 2023, claiming it was necessary to protect vulnerable kids from potential harm.
  • A study commissioned by the state found that gender-affirming care led to positive mental health outcomes, contradicting the lawmakers' claims.
  • Despite evidence supporting gender-affirming care, some Utah Republicans remain hesitant to change the law, indicating a division within the party on the issue.
  • Democratic leaders urged a thorough review of the 1,000-page report before deciding on the ban's future, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based decisions.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Utah lawmakers passed a 2023 ban on gender-affirming care for minors, and a state-commissioned report is now influencing the ban's future.
  • The ban arose from Republican concerns about potential long-term harms, but lawmakers intended it as a temporary measure pending state research.
  • The 1,000-page Utah report, based on thousands of transgender individuals, found that gender-affirming care improves mental health and reduces suicide risk among youth.
  • The report argues that scientific evidence does not support restricting hormone treatments for transgender youth, though some Utah Republicans remain split over the report's conclusions.
  • The report has prompted calls to reconsider restrictions, but some Republican leaders affirm keeping the ban to protect children and maintain the moratorium.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Utah lawmakers passed a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in 2023, claiming it was necessary to protect vulnerable children from harm.
  • Some Utah Republicans showed openness to a study indicating that gender-affirming care leads to positive mental health for transgender youth, while others dismissed the findings.
  • Major medical organizations in the U.S. support gender-affirming care as safe and necessary for transgender youth.
  • Utah's law allows children diagnosed with gender dysphoria before January 2023 to continue hormone treatments, while lawmakers plan to review evidence regarding gender-affirming care alternatives.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

  • No coverage from Other sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™