Voters sue Musk’s America PAC, alleging they were never paid for signing petition


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawsuit allegations

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Elon Musk and America PAC, alleging that participants were not paid as promised for signing a petition during the 2024 election cycle. The suit, led by Lichten & Liss-Riordan law firm, estimates over $5 million in unpaid funds. According to Shannon Liss-Riordan, 'This case is about a broken promise: Elon Musk promised supporters that they would be paid for signing a petition and referring others to do the same.'

Payment discrepancies

While the lawsuit alleges widespread non-payment, some participants shared images of received checks, indicating that at least a portion of petitioners were paid. The allegations focus on those who claim they did not receive compensation, despite promotional materials promising $100 for Pennsylvania voters and $47 for other swing-state participants. These claims are based on statements from the law firm representing the plaintiffs and anecdotal evidence shared by participants online.

Financial incentives

According to the campaign's promotional materials and statements from Elon Musk, the petition aimed to support the First and Second Amendments and register one million voters in swing states. Participants were incentivized with the prospect of financial compensation and referral bonuses, with additional publicity from Musk's announcement of a daily $1 million giveaway to a random petitioner in the weeks leading up to the election.


Full story

Elon Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, are now at the center of a growing legal battle. A class action lawsuit filed this month accuses the organization of failing to pay individuals who signed a petition during the 2024 election cycle, despite promises of financial compensation.

The petition drew national attention last year when it offered money to eligible voters in key battleground states. According to the campaign’s promotional materials, Pennsylvania voters who signed the petition were promised $100, while voters in other swing states were offered $47.

What petition did voters sign?

Participants were also incentivized to refer others to sign the petition, with the chance to earn additional money for each successful referral. In the weeks leading up to the election, Musk announced a daily $1 million giveaway to a random petitioner as part of an effort to ramp up support.

To qualify, signers had to indicate their support for the First and Second Amendments, and had to be a registered voter in a swing state. The petition was a strategy to increase voter registration during the 2024 election cycle, according to Elon Musk.

The petition read: “The First and Second Amendments guarantee freedom of speech and the right to
bear arms. By signing below, I am pledging my support for the First and Second Amendments. Our goal is to get 1 million registered voters in swing states to sign in support of the Constitution, especially freedom of speech and the right to bear arms.”

Lawsuit alleges petitioners left unpaid

Now, several months after the election, a class action lawsuit claims that many participants never received the money they were promised.

The legal action is being led by the firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, which is representing three initial plaintiffs. According to the firm, more than 100 additional people are expected to join the suit.

The estimated total of unpaid funds exceeds $5 million, according to the firm’s calculations of money paid per signature and through the referral incentive program.

“This case is about a broken promise: Elon Musk promised supporters that they would be paid for signing a petition and referring others to do the same,” Shannon Liss-Riordan, co-founder of Liss-Riordan Law Firm, said. “Our clients relied on that promise because they believed in Elon, but unfortunately, that promise was not kept. It appears the promise was broken for many others as well.”

According to some screenshots on X, some voters posted their received checks in the mail, indicating at least some petitioners were paid for their participation.

America PAC denied wrongdoing in earlier, similar suit

As of this report, neither Elon Musk nor America PAC has issued a comment regarding the new lawsuit.

However, the super PAC did respond to a separate legal case filed last month by the same law firm. That earlier lawsuit involved only Pennsylvania residents who signed the petition and said they were not paid.

In that instance, a spokesperson for the super PAC denied any wrongdoing and reaffirmed its commitment to compensating legitimate participants, saying the super PAC has the right to “root out fraud” from the petition.

“America PAC is committed to paying for every legitimate petition signature, which is evidenced by the fact that we have paid tens of millions of dollars to canvassers for their hard work in support of our mission,” Andrew Romeo, America PAC spokesperson, said.

The latest lawsuit expands the legal scope significantly, now covering petitioners from all swing states who claim they never received payment for their participation.

Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) and Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

New allegations claim that a high-profile petition led by Elon Musk and his America PAC during the 2024 election did not fully compensate some individuals who signed in exchange for payment. The lawsuit seeks to hold Musk accountable for those promises, while the super PAC previously maintained that it is honoring its commitment and is conducting fraud prevention reviews.

Alleged breach of contract

The class action lawsuit alleges that some individuals were not compensated as promised, highlighting questions of contractual obligations and potential legal consequences for campaign organizations.

Political campaign tactics

Offering financial incentives for petition signatures and referrals brings attention to evolving and controversial methods used to mobilize voters and support political causes.

Transparency and accountability

The differing accounts regarding payments and statements from America PAC raise questions about the timing of compensation and whether political groups should be required to provide regular updates to participants in incentive-based petition efforts.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

17 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™