Wikipedia co-founder reacts to Musk’s Grokipedia announcement


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Grokipedia

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger said he’s happy Elon Musk plans to create a competitor to the online encyclopedia.

Bias concerns

Sanger is still worried though that the use of xAI’s Grok chatbot could lead to the new platform being biased.

Artificial intelligence

Sanger said he anticipated that artificial intelligence would be used to help create encyclopedias and that he knows it can be done right.


Full story

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger said he is “happy” Elon Musk is creating a competitor to the online encyclopedia, but also expressed concern that the new artificial intelligence-driven platform could be inherently biased. In an interview with Straight Arrow News, Sanger shared insight into how he thinks Musk and the xAI team should build the platform to avoid such pitfalls. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“The more encyclopedias in the world there are, the happier I am,” Sanger told SAN. “I do worry, however, that Grokpedia, or whatever it’s going to be called, will reflect the same sort of biases that Wikipedia has, and that, in fact, the Grok chatbot [large language model] has reflected.”

Musk announced his company, xAI, is building Grokipedia on Tuesday, Sept. 30. 

Grok is an AI model and chatbot that was launched in November 2023. It can reason, generate code, conduct real-time searches and scan the X social media platform to explain current events and answer questions. 

Sanger said shortly after Grok was released, it became left-leaning. He said over the last six months in particular, its answers to questions about politics and culture war issues are written from a left-wing perspective. 

“It’s pretty annoying, unless you actually support that,” Sanger said. 

Sanger explained that prompts written into AI chatbots are “wrapped” by what he describes as a background prompt before being submitted to the system to generate a response. The “wrapping” for the original prompt can be edited to ensure it gives a neutral and accurate response. 

Sanger told SAN that xAI’s current system leads to a biased result — likely because of the background prompt. 

“They have to know that the system as it exists now has the sort of biased result, and therefore, I think they must intend it,” Sanger said. “And if they intend it, that means that they’re probably going to come up with a similarly biased encyclopedia.” 

“I hope I’m wrong, but this is what I suspect,” Sanger told SAN. 

Sanger also told SAN that he had anticipated for a couple of years that AI would be used for encyclopedias and that he had even used it himself. 

“I know it can be done and it can be done reasonably well,” Sanger told SAN. 

Sanger spoke with Straight Arrow News to discuss his nine-point plan to improve Wikipedia. He said the online encyclopedia he co-founded has a left bias and a blacklist of conservative outlets that he believes negatively impacts the information available on the site. For instance, based on the site’s rules, Fox News is considered unreliable and mostly unusable, while MSNBC is reliable. 

Sanger described Wikipedia’s current culture as an echo chamber. 

“Consider joining Wikipedia at some point in the next few months and making your voice heard there. You do have a right to edit there,” Sanger said. “I think Wikipedia needs fresh blood from a wide variety of ideological and religious and other perspectives, national perspectives.” 

Sanger is hoping that Wikipedia’s current leadership will implement his nine-point plan to return it to its founding goal of being neutral.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The development of a new AI-driven encyclopedia by xAI raises questions about bias and neutrality in digital information platforms, especially as concerns are voiced by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger about the risk of similar ideological slants.

AI and information bias

Larry Sanger expresses concern that AI chatbots, including xAI's Grok, may reflect underlying biases, impacting the neutrality and reliability of information on emerging AI-driven encyclopedias.

Competition in knowledge platforms

Efforts by xAI to create a competitor to Wikipedia illustrate ongoing challenges and debates over the control, diversity, and reliability of widely used public information sources.

Calls for neutrality and reform

Sanger advocates for greater ideological diversity and neutrality on information platforms, highlighting ongoing discussions about ensuring fairness and broad representation in digital knowledge databases.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 95 media outlets

Context corner

Wikipedia is a non-profit, volunteer-driven online encyclopedia established in 2001, while Musk’s Grokipedia draws from xAI’s chatbot Grok, joining previous attempts to offer alternative knowledge platforms amid recurring debates about online information bias and control.

History lesson

Previous Wikipedia alternatives such as Conservapedia and Infogalactic have been launched, largely promoted by critics alleging bias in Wikipedia, but have not achieved the same scale or credibility as the original platform.

Terms to know

Grokipedia: Musk's proposed AI-powered online encyclopedia. xAI: Musk's artificial intelligence company. Grok: xAI’s conversational AI model. Editorial bias: Perceived slant in how information is curated or presented on a platform.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

95 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.