Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down 1849 abortion ban


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

WI high court rules on abortion ban

The Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the state’s 1849 near-total abortion ban, ruling that newer laws permitting abortion up to fetal viability override it.

AG Kaul filed lawsuit

The decision follows a 2022 lawsuit by Attorney General Josh Kaul after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Conservatives oppose ruling

The ruling has sparked sharp criticism from conservatives, who argue the court acted on political motives.


Full story

The liberal majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court voted 4-3 to strike down an abortion ban that was 176 years old — a law from the 1800s that almost completely banned abortion. The court ruled that newer laws passed in more recent decades replace the old ban.

Background of the 1849 law

Wisconsin’s 1849 abortion ban, a near-total restriction, was nullified by Roe v. Wade in 1973 but never repealed. After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe in 2022, conservatives claimed the old ban became enforceable again.

That same year, Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit. He argued that newer abortion laws, including a 1985 law allowing abortion until viability, override the 1849 ban.

Court’s majority opinion

“In conclusion, this case is about giving effect to 50 years’ worth of laws passed by the legislature about virtually every aspect of abortion including where, when, and how health-care providers may lawfully perform abortions. The legislature, as the peoples’ representatives, remains free to change the laws with respect to abortion in the future,” the court’s majority opinion states.

Attorney general’s reaction

Attorney General Kaul reacted to the ruling, posting on X, “This marks a major victory for reproductive freedom following the uncertainty and harm to women’s health that have resulted from the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. At a time when rights are endangered, this ruling is a powerful reminder of the importance of advocating for our freedoms.”

Pushback from abortion opponents

Not everyone is happy with the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the 1849 abortion ban. Opponents, including many conservatives and anti-abortion advocates, are vowing to push for legislative or constitutional changes to restore stricter abortion limits.

Wisconsin Representative Lindee Brill expressed strong opposition, stating:

“The Liberal majority in the Supreme Court clearly demonstrated today that they’ll find any way to ensure that the genocide of the unborn will continue in Wisconsin, even if it means baselessly overturning laws which have been enshrined in Wisconsin Statute for 175 years. Make no mistake, they knew before any brief was submitted or argument was made what their decision was going to be. Judges should make decisions based on the law and the facts of the case, not their personal political opinions. This was a reprehensible, partisan decision which will lead to the murder of thousands more innocent, unborn children.”

In Wisconsin, abortion is currently legal up to fetal viability.

Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision to strike down the state's 1849 abortion ban clarifies the legal status of abortion in Wisconsin, affecting access to reproductive health care and setting a precedent for how historic laws may interact with modern legislation following changes in national policy.

Legal interpretation

The case underscores the power of courts to interpret and reconcile conflicts between historic and modern legislation, as seen in the Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling that new abortion laws override the 19th-century ban.

Abortion access

The decision directly impacts the availability of abortion in Wisconsin, determining that providers can continue offering these services under the current legal framework shaped by laws passed since Roe v. Wade.

State and national policy

The ruling illustrates the broader implications of state-level decisions on abortion rights in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, highlighting the ongoing role of state courts and legislatures in shaping reproductive health policy.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 159 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Polling data from the 2024 election cited in multiple sources show that 62% of Wisconsin voters believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while around one-third think it should be illegal in most cases and only 5% believe it should be illegal in all cases. These numbers highlight a public opinion broadly supportive of abortion rights in Wisconsin.

Community reaction

Many articles detail strong responses from different groups. Abortion rights advocates, medical professionals, the ACLU, and Democratic politicians have publicly welcomed the decision, viewing it as a victory for reproductive rights. In contrast, anti-abortion organizations and conservative politicians described the decision as deeply disappointing, accusing the court’s liberal majority of judicial activism and failing to protect unborn lives.

History lesson

The 1849 ban was enforced until 1973. When Roe v. Wade provided federal protection for abortion, the state ban became dormant but technically remained in statute. The 2022 Dobbs decision, reversing Roe, set off renewed legal challenges in states with historic bans like Wisconsin, illustrating how legal and societal contexts continually reshape abortion regulation.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frames the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision as a “monumental win” and a crucial defense of reproductive rights, emphasizing the “liberal majority” and portraying the 1849 abortion ban as a “draconian 19th century statute” invalidated to protect bodily autonomy.
  • Media outlets in the center remains largely neutral and detailed on legislative dynamics and public health impacts.
  • Media outlets on the right cast the ruling as “judicial overreach,” repeatedly denouncing the majority for “usurping the legislature’s role” with “personal preference” and condemning the decision as a “jaw-dropping exercise of judicial will.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

189 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that an 1849 abortion ban effectively does not prohibit abortions due to more recent legislation.
  • Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul challenged the 1849 law, asserting it banned feticide, not consensual abortions, resulting in the court's favorable ruling.
  • The decision highlights the court's liberal majority, maintained after contentious elections, with dissenters criticizing the ruling as judicial overreach.
  • Supporters like Melinda Brennan of the ACLU of Wisconsin celebrated the ruling, stating it contributes to a more just society and emphasizes the importance of protecting reproductive rights.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban in a 4-3 ruling on July 2, 2025.
  • The ban, adopted in 1849 and made a felony for destroying unborn life, was never repealed but was largely unenforced due to Roe v. Wade until its 2022 overturn.
  • The court determined that the 1849 abortion ban was overridden by a more recent 1985 law, which restricts abortions solely after a fetus is capable of surviving outside the womb, thereby offering clearer legal safeguards for abortion rights.
  • Governor Tony Evers vowed to oppose the ban by refusing to appoint enforcing district attorneys and offering clemency to convicted doctors, framing abortion rights as central in his contested 2025 reelection campaign.
  • This ruling affirms abortion access in Wisconsin, offering patients and providers legal certainty while prompting ongoing political and legal efforts from both abortion rights and anti-abortion advocates.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted 4-3 to strike down the state's 1849 abortion ban, concluding it was impliedly repealed by later laws, according to Justice Rebecca Dallet's majority opinion.
  • Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul argued that the 1849 law was implicitly repealed by modern legislation that allowed abortions until viability.
  • Dissenting Justice Annette Ziegler criticized the ruling as a 'jaw-dropping exercise of judicial will,' asserting it was based on the justices' personal preferences instead of legal precedent.
  • This ruling affirms that abortions remain legal in Wisconsin up to approximately 20 weeks of pregnancy, following comprehensive legislation since 1973.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™