‘Without me, Trump would have lost election’: Musk, Trump spar over bill


Summary

Political relationship

Tension between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump escalated on Thursday when the two began a public social media argument over their relationship.

Budget bill dispute

The conflict is partly centered around a recent Congressional spending bill, which Trump called the "big beautiful bill." Trump suggested Musk’s opposition to the bill was because of EV credit cuts, but Musk denied the claim.

Public criticism

After leaving his White House advisory role, Musk increased public criticism of the “big beautiful bill,” criticizing deficit spending and the president’s stance on fiscal responsibility.


Full story

A war of words erupted Thursday, June 5, between onetime political allies Elon Musk and President Donald Trump, marking a dramatic shift in tone between the two in less than a week. Musk claimed Trump would have lost the election without his support in the latest escalation, and Trump told reporters Thursday he was unsure if the two would remain friends.

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Musk said in a post on X Thursday. “Such ingratitude.”

The comment came after Trump suggested Musk was opposing his “big, beautiful” budget bill merely because the Tesla CEO was upset about the bill’s planned elimination of the government’s electric vehicle credit. 

Trump sounds off from Oval Office press conference

Speaking from the Oval Office during a press conference alongside Germany’s chancellor, Friedrich Merz, Trump said Musk’s criticism of the legislation stems from the removal of the EV tax credit.

“All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that’s billions and billions of dollars, and really that’s unfair,” Trump said.  

The president went on to say he did not know if their relationship could be repaired.

“Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” Trump said. “He wore the hat, ‘Trump was right about everything,’ and I am right about the great, big, beautiful bill.”

Trump added he was surprised by Musk’s words but noted there have been other former Trump staffers who have jumped ship and changed their rhetoric.

“I’ll tell you, he’s not the first,” Trump said. “People leave my administration and they love us. Then, at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is. It’s sort of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’”

After the Oval Office press conference, Trump took to his social media platform Truth Social, saying he asked Musk to leave.

After friendly departure, Musk unleashes on X

The tension follows Musk’s public departure from his advisory role at the White House last week.

“I’ll continue to be visiting here and being a friend and adviser to the president,” Musk said while offering praise for the president Friday, May 30th.

But just days later, Musk began more publicly criticizing Trump’s new spending package.

“This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,” he wrote Tuesday on X.

Musk, a vocal opponent of raising the debt ceiling, took to reposting old Trump tweets from years past, in which Trump condemned deficit spending and called for fiscal responsibility.

In one repost, Musk highlighted a 2013 Trump tweet that said, “I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!”

Musk captioned it: “Wise words.”

Another reply featured screenshots of Trump posts demanding a balanced budget and banning deficits. Musk asked, “Where is this guy today??”

Musk denied his opposition to the bill had anything to do with EV tax credits, as Trump suggested Thursday, posting on X a video from 2021 of him supporting an end to EV subsidies.

‘Big, beautiful bill’ sparks GOP infighting over spending

The legislation at the center of the dispute — which Trump dubbed the “big beautiful bill” — passed the House May 22 and now sits with the Senate, where it faces an uphill battle. The Republican-led bill touches on a wide array of issues including extending the Trump tax cuts, border security and immigration enforcement, defense spending, and a higher debt ceiling.

But fiscal conservatives within the GOP have expressed alarm at the cost. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is among those opposing the bill. He challenged the idea that raising the debt ceiling doesn’t increase debt.

“We have never raised the debt ceiling without actually meeting that target,” Paul said. “If you increase the ceiling $5 trillion, you’ll meet that. It puts it off the back burner. Then we won’t discuss it for a year or two.”

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the House-passed bill would add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade before interest is included. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warns that if made permanent, the legislation could swell the national debt by $5 trillion.

Chris Field (Executive Editor) and Ally Heath (Senior Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

The public fallout between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk over federal spending legislation underscores deepening divisions within the Republican Party, as the once-allied figures clash over key provisions in the bill and the broader direction of GOP fiscal policy.

Political alliances

The deterioration of the once-close relationship between Trump and Musk underscores how political coalitions can fracture over policy disagreements and personal interests, potentially leading to broader shifts within party dynamics.

Federal spending and policy

Debate over the “big, beautiful bill” and its impact on the national deficit brings attention to ongoing concerns about government spending, fiscal policy, and specific measures like the elimination of electric vehicle tax credits, as discussed by multiple sources.

Influence of wealthy individuals

Elon Musk, the GOP’s largest donor in the 2024 election cycle, turned his financial influence against President Trump on Thursday, claiming the president wouldn’t have won the election without his support.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 49 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Several articles reference large monetary contributions and spending impacts. Elon Musk reportedly contributed between $250 million and $300 million to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. The disputed “big, beautiful bill” has been described as potentially increasing the U.S. federal deficit by $2.3 to $5 trillion over ten years and includes savings claims of $180 billion from cuts advocated by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

Oppo research

Opponents of Musk’s position, as reported in both left- and right-leaning sources, accuse him of acting out of business self-interest rather than public good, citing his frustration over the loss of subsidies. Conversely, Trump’s critics argue he is willing to sever alliances when loyalty is questioned or when business interests challenge political priorities.

Policy impact

If enacted, Trump’s proposed budget bill would reduce or eliminate federal subsidies for electric vehicles, directly affecting Tesla and its consumers. The bill aims to cut government spending but may increase the deficit over time. The decision not to appoint Musk’s NASA nominee also reflects tension between private-sector actors and federal policymaking, with broader consequences for space and energy sectors.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Musk-Trump rift primarily through the lens of environmental policy and legislative secrecy, portraying Musk’s criticism of the spending bill’s rollback of EV incentives as principled frustration, often using terms like “scorched earth” and “blasts” to emphasize Musk’s forceful attacks and Trump’s perceived ingratitude.
  • Media outlets in the center temper these extremes, highlighting the surprising political fallout and “implosion” of their alliance without heavy partisan language.
  • Media outlets on the right elevate Musk as an indispensable “kingmaker,” spotlighting his claim that Trump couldn’t have won without him and deploying more sensational language around the “feud” and Trump’s coined “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” casting Musk’s opposition as partly principled yet emotionally charged.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

83 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Elon Musk claimed on X that without him, Donald Trump would have lost the election, stating that "Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate."
  • Trump responded that he would have won Pennsylvania, a key state, "regardless" of Musk's support.
  • Musk's comments arose after Trump was questioned about Musk's views on a spending bill in Congress.
  • Trump expressed disappointment with Musk's remarks during a press conference in the Oval Office.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Elon Musk and Donald Trump publicly clashed in early June 2025 in an ongoing dispute on the social media platform X.
  • The feud intensified after Musk criticized Trump’s recent policy bill largely for increasing federal debt, prompting Trump’s first public rebuke of Musk.
  • Trump suggested Musk opposes the bill due to losing the electric vehicle incentive and questioned their friendship while Musk highlighted his prior $250 million campaign support.
  • Musk claimed, "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," while Trump insisted he would have won Pennsylvania regardless and called Musk’s stance unfair.
  • The dispute reflects a sharp breakdown in their relationship and signals broader tensions over policy and political influence ahead of the August debt ceiling deadline.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Elon Musk claimed that Donald Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support, stating that Democrats would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate without him.
  • Musk criticized a recent tax and spending bill passed by the House of Representatives, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.'
  • In response to Musk's comments, Trump stated he would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Musk's support, suggesting Musk had developed 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.'
  • Musk denied Trump's claims of being informed about the bill, stating, 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™