Hey, everybody. Peter Zion, here it is August 5, fifth, and the Prime Minister of Bangladesh Hasina has fled the country after nationwide riots which have killed a few dozen people. This started out as a group of young people who were basically desperate for jobs. Government jobs are basically guaranteed to people who fought in the revolution or their descendants. And if you’re not one of those people, you’re kind of out of luck, because all that’s left in the economy is becoming a wage slave for the textile industry. And I, when I say wage slave, I literally mean wage slave in horrible, horrible conditions. Basically, we’ve decided to get rid of sweatshops, and so everything just went to Bangladesh or to do an incredibly dangerous job, which is called ship breaking, which takes old vessels, physically breaks them down, and then recycles the steel, very easy to get maimed doing that job. Anyway, that’s it. That’s the entire Bangladeshi economy. And anyway, what started out as protest about jobs basically spread to concern about corruption and incompetence, and if you’re looking for corruption and competence, Bangladesh is the place for you. You basically have a couple of political parties that have switched back and forth and back and forth and back and forth over the course of the last higher existence of the country since the 70s,
turning everything into a patronage network. So we had a period 1520, 25 years ago, where most services for most of the population were not provided by the government, because that was all corrupt. You basically had foreign NGOs coming in to do social services. Well over the last 20 years, those NGOs have basically been brought into the patronage network, and so most of them stopped operations, and the ones that remain are not exactly doing a lot of great work. So there’s nothing going on here from a positive point of view, from a community point of view, except for generating most of the world’s ready to wear knitwear. So for example, if you’re into fast fashion, you are taking advantage of the near slave conditions in Bangladesh and massive corruption. So congratulations to you. Anyway, where does this bring us? Well, this is a country of, you know, 100 odd million people, and it’s on a very small footprint of land with very few economic opportunities, with almost no resources. Agriculture is largely subsistence, and the government has now failed. Neither of the political parties are in a position to take up governance. I mean, the ruling party just lost the Prime Minister. They don’t have anyone who’s less corrupted in the ranks, and the opposition is
fractured to stay the least. They do have a history of having military coups and military rule from time to time. But one of the positive, if that’s the right word, things the most recent government has done is gutted the military to make military coups less capable. So the military probably doesn’t have the skill set that’s necessary to take over. So barring some sort of surprise breakthrough and an internal knight in shining armor, which I have a hard time envisioning, we’re probably going to see a lot of economic destitution and civil breakdown, which means we’re probably going to see millions of refugees and immigrants leaving Bangladesh for some other place. Here’s the thing, the only land border that Bangladesh has is India, perhaps around the country. So in India, we’ve got a government under Modi, who has been in control now for well over a decade, but he hasn’t faced an international crisis at all. There’s really only two countries that matter in terms of mere abroad relations. One is Pakistan, nuclear threat. A few wars in the past, but relations there have been pretty calm. Most of the drama has been on the Pakistani side of the equation, which has kind of kept Pakistan bottled up in its own juices and allowed the Indians to relax a little bit. And the other one is Bangladesh, which has also been calm until now. So the Modi government, unfortunately doesn’t have a lot of experience in dealing with crises, because there hasn’t been one in the last 10 years. And now you’re talking about an economic one, where you’re talking about a surge of people potentially coming into India, that India simply doesn’t have the facilities, the infrastructure, the capital or the jobs in order to absorb these people competently. There’s also the issue that the Modi government has very few connections to the Bangladeshi Government. Yes, in past years, there have been reasonably strong connections between Indian governments and the Bangladeshi parties, but most of that was under Congress, which is now in opposition. So we get kind of a double crisis here, with Bangladesh potentially falling apart, and with India not really having the traction it needs to deal with the situation in a meaningful way. So lot of moving pieces in this, and none of them are really moving in the right direction, but we’re gonna find out real soon what the Modi government is made of when it comes to an international issue that actually matters to it right on its own border, as opposed to dealing with some sort of.
Online movement issue that has broader political connotations around the world, but is mostly about atmospherics. I mean, this is where the rubber is going to hit the road, and we’re going to find out real soon. Yeah.
What is happening in Bangladesh?
By Straight Arrow News
On Aug. 5, Sheikh Hasina stepped down from her position as prime minister of Bangladesh. Hasina had ruled Bangladesh for 15 years, but resigned after nationwide public protests boiled over and left nearly a hundred civilians dead. Muhammad Yunus, a famous Bangladeshi economist widely respected by global leaders, agreed to run an interim national government after Hasina fled to India.
Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan discusses where Bangladesh goes from here and how the political disruption might impact nearby countries — especially India.
Be the first to know when Peter Zeihan publishes a new commentary! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from Peter’s Aug. 12 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
The situation in Bangladesh has worsened, forcing the prime minister to flee the country. Let’s recap what led us to this point and look at what the future might hold for Bangladesh and India.
The youth in Bangladesh began protesting the lack of job opportunities, since government jobs were reserved for those who fought in the revolution and their descendants. The alternative jobs available are working in the textile industry for pennies or risking their lives ship breaking. Not a ton of solid opportunities…
A history of corruption and political incompetence has led the Bangladeshi people to this point, and taking a page out of the prime minister’s book wouldn’t be the worst idea for many. That means millions of refugees could be fleeing Bangladesh and most of them would likely be heading to India. But is Modi’s government ready to handle this kind of international crisis?
India hasn’t had to to deal with many international incidents in recent years, so they lack the infrastructure and resources to effectively manage a major crisis like this. When millions of people come knocking on the border door, it will definitely be cause for concern for the Modi government.
Hey, everybody. Peter Zion, here it is August 5, fifth, and the Prime Minister of Bangladesh Hasina has fled the country after nationwide riots which have killed a few dozen people. This started out as a group of young people who were basically desperate for jobs. Government jobs are basically guaranteed to people who fought in the revolution or their descendants. And if you’re not one of those people, you’re kind of out of luck, because all that’s left in the economy is becoming a wage slave for the textile industry. And I, when I say wage slave, I literally mean wage slave in horrible, horrible conditions. Basically, we’ve decided to get rid of sweatshops, and so everything just went to Bangladesh or to do an incredibly dangerous job, which is called ship breaking, which takes old vessels, physically breaks them down, and then recycles the steel, very easy to get maimed doing that job. Anyway, that’s it. That’s the entire Bangladeshi economy. And anyway, what started out as protest about jobs basically spread to concern about corruption and incompetence, and if you’re looking for corruption and competence, Bangladesh is the place for you. You basically have a couple of political parties that have switched back and forth and back and forth and back and forth over the course of the last higher existence of the country since the 70s,
turning everything into a patronage network. So we had a period 1520, 25 years ago, where most services for most of the population were not provided by the government, because that was all corrupt. You basically had foreign NGOs coming in to do social services. Well over the last 20 years, those NGOs have basically been brought into the patronage network, and so most of them stopped operations, and the ones that remain are not exactly doing a lot of great work. So there’s nothing going on here from a positive point of view, from a community point of view, except for generating most of the world’s ready to wear knitwear. So for example, if you’re into fast fashion, you are taking advantage of the near slave conditions in Bangladesh and massive corruption. So congratulations to you. Anyway, where does this bring us? Well, this is a country of, you know, 100 odd million people, and it’s on a very small footprint of land with very few economic opportunities, with almost no resources. Agriculture is largely subsistence, and the government has now failed. Neither of the political parties are in a position to take up governance. I mean, the ruling party just lost the Prime Minister. They don’t have anyone who’s less corrupted in the ranks, and the opposition is
fractured to stay the least. They do have a history of having military coups and military rule from time to time. But one of the positive, if that’s the right word, things the most recent government has done is gutted the military to make military coups less capable. So the military probably doesn’t have the skill set that’s necessary to take over. So barring some sort of surprise breakthrough and an internal knight in shining armor, which I have a hard time envisioning, we’re probably going to see a lot of economic destitution and civil breakdown, which means we’re probably going to see millions of refugees and immigrants leaving Bangladesh for some other place. Here’s the thing, the only land border that Bangladesh has is India, perhaps around the country. So in India, we’ve got a government under Modi, who has been in control now for well over a decade, but he hasn’t faced an international crisis at all. There’s really only two countries that matter in terms of mere abroad relations. One is Pakistan, nuclear threat. A few wars in the past, but relations there have been pretty calm. Most of the drama has been on the Pakistani side of the equation, which has kind of kept Pakistan bottled up in its own juices and allowed the Indians to relax a little bit. And the other one is Bangladesh, which has also been calm until now. So the Modi government, unfortunately doesn’t have a lot of experience in dealing with crises, because there hasn’t been one in the last 10 years. And now you’re talking about an economic one, where you’re talking about a surge of people potentially coming into India, that India simply doesn’t have the facilities, the infrastructure, the capital or the jobs in order to absorb these people competently. There’s also the issue that the Modi government has very few connections to the Bangladeshi Government. Yes, in past years, there have been reasonably strong connections between Indian governments and the Bangladeshi parties, but most of that was under Congress, which is now in opposition. So we get kind of a double crisis here, with Bangladesh potentially falling apart, and with India not really having the traction it needs to deal with the situation in a meaningful way. So lot of moving pieces in this, and none of them are really moving in the right direction, but we’re gonna find out real soon what the Modi government is made of when it comes to an international issue that actually matters to it right on its own border, as opposed to dealing with some sort of.
Online movement issue that has broader political connotations around the world, but is mostly about atmospherics. I mean, this is where the rubber is going to hit the road, and we’re going to find out real soon. Yeah.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
Biden Administration granted Iran $10B in sanctions relief days after election
22 sources | 0% from the left Getty ImagesAmnesty International warns Saudi Arabia World Cup will put ‘many lives at risk’
26 sources | 21% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
FBI Director Christopher Wray to resign ahead of Trump inauguration
Arkansas Gov. Sanders calls for a ban on buying junk food with SNAP
Biden approves national security memo detailing cooperation by US adversaries
Google reveals ‘first-of-its-kind’ $20B renewable energy data center projects
Biden threatens to veto bipartisan bill that would let Trump appoint more judges
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Congress must invest in military, stay vigilant
7 hrs ago Newt Gingrich‘Hero’ label for CEO killer reveals health care system outrage
10 hrs ago Adrienne LawrenceMSNBC’s Scarborough, Brzezinski kiss the ring at Mar-a-Lago
Tuesday Ruben NavarretteBiden’s pardon of Hunter leaves questions unanswered
Tuesday Ben Weingarten