Congress overturns Californiaโ€™s 2035 EV mandate


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

EV mandate over

Congress voted to override California's 2035 EV mandate which was made possible by a waiver granted by the EPA.

The nuclear option

The Congressional Review Act allows congress to overturn agency rules. After the Senate Parliamentarian said the EPA waiver does not apply to the CRA, Republicans moved forward anyway.

New precedent

Democrats warned Republicans that this would create a new precedent that likely cannot be undone. "What goes around comes around," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said.


Full story

Congress overrode Californiaโ€™s 2035 electric vehicle mandate after a party-line vote in the Senate, which could set a new precedent for rule-making across the federal government. Lawmakers also voted to override the stateโ€™s emissions standards for diesel trucks, including heavy-duty and commercial vehicles.ย 

How we got here

California has a special carve-out in the Clean Air Act, which allows the state to ask the Environmental Protection Agency for permission to create regulations that are stricter than the federal governmentโ€™s. If the EPA approves, it will grant California a waiver.ย 

No other state can do that, but any state can adopt Californiaโ€™s stricter standards

Carmakers often build vehicles to align with Californiaโ€™s standards, which means they either meet or exceed the rules in every other state.

At the end of the Biden administration, the EPA gave California permission to require all new cars in the state to be zero emissions by 2035 and to set new emissions rules for diesel and commercial vehicles.

Why Republicans opposed California’s rules

Republicans opposed the rules because they said the transition would be costly, the country doesnโ€™t have the infrastructure to support it, and they argued it was, in essence, the government telling people what cars theyโ€™re allowed to drive.ย 

โ€œFor carmakers, the consequences are severe. If you donโ€™t sell enough electric vehicles, California is saying to them and to the other states that signed onto this, even when Americans donโ€™t want to buy them, too bad!โ€ Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said. โ€œThese people will pay a fine of $20,000 per vehicle.โ€ 

Why Democrats supported the rules

Democrats support the rules and believe they will help move the entire world toward greener energy faster.ย 

โ€œThey proved if you create the right incentives, the technology will move in the right direction, and it has successfully,โ€ Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said. 

Democrats also opposed how Republicans overturned Californiaโ€™s waivers.ย 

What’s the Congressional Review Act?

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Around 1-in-4 new cars registered in California in 2024 were electric vehicles, according to the California Energy Commission.

The Congressional Review Act, or CRA, allows Congress to overturn a federal agency rule with a simple majority vote. If both houses of Congress and the president sign on, the rule cannot take effect. 

Republicans contend these EPA waivers meet all the requirements of the CRA. However, the Senate Parliamentarian, the nonpartisan official in charge of ensuring the chamber follows its own rules, said the California waivers do not fall within the CRA. That decision was based on a Government Accountability Office analysis.ย 

So Republicans used whatโ€™s called the nuclear option to change Senate rules and vote on the waiver despite the parliamentarian. 

โ€œIt is an improper use of the so-called nuclear option, which essentially avoids the cloture provisions of our rules,โ€ Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said. 

Cloture is the process of ending debate or overcoming the filibuster. So when Democrats say Republicans are avoiding cloture, theyโ€™re in essence saying they are going around the filibuster. Thatโ€™s an accusation Republicans deny.ย 

โ€œI think at this point it should be abundantly clear that what weโ€™re doing has nothing to do with the legislative filibuster,โ€ Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said. โ€œBut while Iโ€™d love to think that reality would prevail, I fully expect Democrats to continue to misrepresent the situation.โ€

Thune is contradicting himself. 

In January, Majority Leader Thune was asked during an interview with Punchbowl News whether heโ€™d advise his party against overriding the parliamentarian. He answered, โ€œThatโ€™s totally akin to killing the filibuster. We canโ€™t go there.โ€

Republicans contend the Government Accountability Office was out of line by ruling the EPA waiver was not subject to Congressโ€™ Congressional Review Act authority. 

โ€œIf we don’t do that, that is a major shift in power to the administration that will be abused by Republican and Democrat administrations alike. That is a transition of power to the article one branch that we’re not going to allow to happen,โ€ Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. 

Democrats warned Republicans that they are changing Senate precedent in a way that likely cannot be undone.

โ€œWhat goes around comes around. If Republicans are willing to overrule the parliamentarian and hijack the CRA in a way that has never been used before, they will not like it the next time they are in the minority,โ€ Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said.ย 

Both chambers of Congress have voted to overturn Californiaโ€™s EPA waivers. The last step in the process is President Trumpโ€™s signature.

Snorre Wik (Photographer/Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The Senate's vote to block California's plan to ban new gas-powered cars by 2035 highlights a pivotal conflict over state versus federal authority, environmental policy, and legislative procedures with potential nationwide implications for climate action, consumer choices, and future regulatory rulemaking.

State versus federal authority

This theme is important because the Senate's action to override California's waiver โ€” traditionally a state right under the Clean Air Act โ€” raises questions about the balance of power between state governments and the federal government over environmental regulations.

Environmental and climate policy

The blocking of California's zero-emission vehicle mandate affects efforts to lower greenhouse gas emissions, reduce pollution, and influence the direction of future U.S. climate policy, as noted by environmental groups and California officials.

Legislative and procedural precedent

The unusual use of the Congressional Review Act and the Senate's decision to bypass established procedural norms may set new precedents for how future regulations are made, revoked, or debated, with broader implications for Congressional oversight of executive branch actions.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 88 media outlets

Community reaction

Automakers, represented by groups like the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, welcomed the Senate decision, asserting that the targets set by Californiaโ€™s rule were unachievable. Environmental and public health groups, including the American Lung Association and the Natural Resources Defense Council, reacted negatively, arguing that the rollback would worsen air quality and public health outcomes.

Context corner

Californiaโ€™s authority to set stricter vehicle emissions standards is rooted in the Clean Air Act, which recognizes the state's longstanding air pollution problems. Over 50 years, California has received more than 100 federal waivers, shaping both state and national regulations. This context explains why Californiaโ€™s policies tend to influence car manufacturing and environmental regulation across the U.S.

Policy impact

If upheld, the Senateโ€™s decision could curtail Californiaโ€™s ability to set independent emissions standards, preventing other states from adopting similar regulations. This would impact manufacturersโ€™ planning, potentially slow the shift to electric vehicles, affect efforts to reduce air pollution, and alter market incentives for clean vehicle technology nationwide.

Sources

  1. Senate legislative record
  2. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.
  3. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
  4. The Congressional Review Act
  5. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.
  6. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Senate repeal of Californiaโ€™s gas-powered car ban as a harmful "rollback" threatening environmental progress and public health, employing emotionally charged language like โ€œpoint of no returnโ€ and โ€œillegalโ€ to underscore the stakes.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right celebrate the vote as a victory against a burdensome โ€œde facto EV mandate,โ€ using dismissive terms such as โ€œnix,โ€ โ€œnullifies,โ€ and casting the regulation as a โ€œback-door banโ€ that infringes on consumer freedom and statesโ€™ rights.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

139 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Senate voted to block California's rule banning new gas-powered cars by 2035, passing the first of three resolutions to undo the state's vehicle emissions standards.
  • The resolution will go to the White House for President Donald Trump's signature, along with two other measures to block California's rules.
  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer stated that the Congressional Review Act could erase any policy from an agency disapproved by the Trump administration.
  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the use of the Congressional Review Act unlawful and indicated that the state would likely challenge it in court.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Senate voted on Thursday, May 22, to block California's rule banning new gas-powered car sales by 2035, sending the resolution to the White House.
  • Republicans regained the Senate majority and used a new simple majority vote process to reject state EPA waivers that enabled California's strict electric vehicle mandate.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom along with environmental regulators in California have declared the congressional move unlawful and indicated they plan to file a lawsuit to uphold the state's emission regulations.
  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the mandate affects the entire country, while Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called blocking the rules a "point of no return."
  • The Senate's decision challenges California's significant influence on emissions reduction and vehicle market trends, risking setbacks to national efforts to curb pollution.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Senate voted 51-44 to block California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, reversing the Biden administration's decision to allow stricter environmental regulations.
  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the vote would impact California's plans to lower transportation emissions.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized the move as illegal and warned it could harm public health, stating it's a choice between siding with America or China.
  • Republicans argue the ban on gas-powered cars is costly and unnecessary, with concerns about electric grid strain.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Sources

  1. Senate legislative record
  2. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.
  3. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
  4. The Congressional Review Act
  5. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.
  6. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.