Newsom looks to divert climate funding for high-speed rail as costs keep climbing


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Rail delays

California's high-speed rail project was initially supposed to be completed in 2020 but has yet to connect any city with an operating rail line.

Financial trouble

The Bakersfield to Merced line of the project could end up needing another $3.2 billion, according to documents recently obtained by KCRA.

No federal help

President Donald Trump is not willing to use federal funds for the project, saying, "We're not going to pay for that thing."


Full story

In January, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, D, joined rail authority officials outside of Bakersfield to celebrate the initial construction of the state’s high-speed rail. The governor hammered a ceremonial spike into the ground and discussed the project.

โ€œNo state in America is closer to launching high-speed rail than California โ€” and today, we just took a massive step forward,โ€ Newsom said.

In a moment of symbolism, the spike wasnโ€™t for the actual high-speed rail. Instead, it commemorated a railhead for a traditional track that will deliver supplies to the high-speed rail construction work that’s to begin at a later date.

Californiaโ€™s high-speed rail line, a decades-old public works project that has yet to see a train in operation or any cities connected by the rail despite billions of dollars spent and targets missed, is in need of more funding. Newsomโ€™s budget revision is proposing a new multi-billion-dollar revenue stream using funding meant to reduce pollution. 

The proposal is meant to shore up a widening gap between whatโ€™s needed to keep the expansive project on track and what the stateโ€™s volatile budget can afford after President Donald Trump made it clear that thereโ€™d be no help from Washington.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The original cost estimate for the San Francisco to Los Angeles high-speed rail project was $33 billion with a finish date in 2020, but new estimates peg the ongoing project at over $106 billion.

Deeper hole

NBC affiliate KCRA obtained documents saying the Bakersfield to Merced line could need more funding than most recently estimated. The memo reportedly warned that the lineโ€™s cost could increase by up to another $3.2 billion. If accurate, the total projectโ€™s budget deficit would amount to more than $10 billion. The memo reportedly pointed to inflation and the increasing cost of materials.

In the years since initial approval, the โ€œstarter lineโ€ connecting the two inland cities has grown to $38.5 billion. At the time of the initial bond issuance in 2008, the stateย estimatedย the cost to be $33 billion in non-inflated dollars. A spokesperson for CAHSR, after publication of this story, pointed to a 2006ย estimateย of $45 billion that was included in 2008’s Prop. 1A.

Cap and trade funds

Newsomโ€™s May revision to the stateโ€™s budget proposes using funding from the stateโ€™s cap-and-trade auction for the high-speed rail project. He said the dedicated funding stream of at least $1 billion annually would โ€œestablish a stable and predictable funding streamโ€ that would allow railway officials to plan better. His proposal would also see the extension of the cap-and-trade program thatโ€™s funded by purchases of allotments to offset pollution to 2045. The auction is set to wind down in 2030.

โ€œA guaranteed minimum funding level will also improve the project’s ability to attract private capital and leverage additional funds upfront, which will accelerate project delivery, lower long-term costs, and increase flexibility through alternative delivery methods,โ€ his proposal states.

Trump not interested

Funding for the railway depends on continual influxes of cash from the state and the federal government. U.S. Department of Transportation officials have cast doubt on the thought of replenishing the projectโ€™s coffers, and Trump poured cold water on the project earlier in May.

โ€œThat train is the worst cost overrun Iโ€™ve ever seen,โ€ Trump said in a May 6 media availability in the Oval Office. โ€œWeโ€™re not going to pay for that thing.โ€

Will it ever finish? 

The ambitious project was pitched in 2008 with a target completion in 2020. Delays from environmental impact studies mandated by state and local law ate up more than a decade. According to the Free Beacon, the cost of those studies was $537 million.

The Bakersfield to Merced line is the first to see construction take place. A Feb. 3, 2025, report from the California Office of the Inspector General said the already-delayed completion date of 2033 is unlikely. The report points to previous delays, future uncertainty and ongoing disagreements with third parties.

Rail authority officials are scheduled to give an update this summer.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

California's high-speed rail project highlights ongoing challenges in large-scale infrastructure development, including cost overruns, delayed timelines, and funding uncertainties, raising questions about the state's strategy for clean transportation and public investment.

Cost overruns public perception

Significant increases in project costs and persistent budget gaps have heavily impacted the rail project since it's inception in 2008, but polls show that a majority of Californians still support it.

Environmental and political context

The proposed use of cap-and-trade funds and lack of federal support, as noted by Gov. Gavin Newsom and statements from former President Donald Trump, reflect the broader political and environmental context shaping infrastructure initiatives in the state.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 14 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Cost figures for the Bakersfield to Merced segment of Californiaโ€™s high-speed rail have increased from an estimated $35.3 billion to as much as $38.5 billion due to inflation and rising material costs. The project could soon face a budget gap of $10.2 billion, while $14 billion has already been spent, with $4 billion in federal funds still under audit.

Community reaction

Various stakeholders express concern about the prioritization of cap-and-trade funds. Environmental justice groups worry about less funding available for other climate projects, while critics and some lawmakers are troubled by ongoing overruns and lack of transparency. Communities potentially affected by service changes or budget reallocations are questioning the long-term value the project will provide.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

14 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™