New government policy for revoking international students’ legal status


Summary

Policy change

ICE issued a new policy allowing international student records to be terminated if their visas are revoked, which can trigger the loss of legal U.S. status.

Legal backlash

Courts issued injunctions halting many terminations after lawsuits alleged ICE acted without due process and outside legal authority.

Academic concerns

Universities and advocates say the policy is chilling free speech, especially pro-Palestinian activism and threatens academic stability nationwide.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Policy change

ICE issued a new policy allowing international student records to be terminated if their visas are revoked, which can trigger the loss of legal U.S. status.

Legal backlash

Courts issued injunctions halting many terminations after lawsuits alleged ICE acted without due process and outside legal authority.

Academic concerns

Universities and advocates say the policy is chilling free speech, especially pro-Palestinian activism and threatens academic stability nationwide.


Full story

The Trump administration updated its immigration policy to allow visa revocations to trigger immediate termination of international students’ legal status in the U.S. A newly released internal memo from Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed that Student and Exchange Visitor Program personnel may now terminate Student and Exchange Visitor Information System records if the State Department revokes a student’s visa.

The memo shows that a visa revocation alone can now be enough for ICE to cancel a student’s SEVIS record and start deportation proceedings. Until now, losing a visa didn’t automatically mean losing legal status inside the U.S.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

SEVIS is a Homeland Security system monitoring the legal status of international students in the U.S., tracking school enrollment and visa compliance and allowing ICE to flag violations that may lead to deportation.

SEVP now lists several grounds for termination, including failure to report employment while on Optional Practical Training, exceeding unemployment limits, withdrawal from school and failure to comply with visa terms.

More than 200 students filed lawsuits or secured court orders to block the terminations. Judges in several states, including Massachusetts and the District of Columbia, issued temporary restraining orders to block immigration enforcement while the legal battles played out.

In one case, a federal judge in Boston extended a protection order that stopped officials from detaining a Boston University student whose SEVIS record had been canceled.

At the same time, the Department of Justice acknowledged in court filings that SEVIS reinstatements would apply to plaintiffs as well as to other affected students.

Under scrutiny from federal courts, ICE confirmed the release of a new policy outlining specific criteria for terminating student records. A copy reviewed by Bloomberg Law indicates that ICE still retains broad discretion. The updated policy allows record termination for visa revocations, status changes and school withdrawals.

Government attorneys have argued in multiple lawsuits that terminating a student’s SEVIS record does not necessarily impact their lawful status in the U.S., according to Bloomberg Law. Attorneys representing students have challenged that claim, citing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidance and noting that terminations often lead to the loss of work authorization and the inability to change visa categories.

Are the reinstated students safe from future enforcement?

ICE has reinstated access to SEVIS for students for whom the administration did not formally revoke visas and paused enforcement while it finalizes the new framework. However, litigation continues.

Plaintiffs argue that the administration acted without due process and terminated records based on minor infractions or political expression. The American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups represent students in cases now moving through federal courts.

What broader concerns are being raised?

University officials and immigration advocates warned the policy shift could discourage international enrollment and undermine academic freedom. The American Immigration Lawyers Association said the Trump administration has removed over 4,700 records since the president took office in January.

Faculty groups, including the University Council AFT and University of California faculty associations, have urged schools to protect affected students by allowing remote instruction and continuing financial support.

DHS has not commented on the new policy, and several government attorneys admitted in court that they had not yet reviewed the updated guidance. Meanwhile, students across the country await final rulings on their legal status as the administration moves to formalize the rules governing SEVIS terminations.

Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: ,

Why this story matters

This news story highlights significant issues surrounding the treatment of international students in the U.S. and raises questions about immigration policy, legal status and due process.

Immigration enforcement

The U.S. government's crackdown on international students illustrates the complexities and potential injustices within immigration enforcement policies, affecting thousands of students.

Legal status

The situation emphasizes the precarious nature of legal status for international students, as their futures may hinge on bureaucratic processes that can be flawed or rushed.

Higher education impact

The abrupt revocation of student visas not only creates fear among international students but also risks damaging the reputation of U.S. higher education institutions that rely on diverse student populations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 68 media outlets

Common ground

Across various news articles, two significant points of common ground are the confusion and fear experienced by international students facing visa revocation and the lack of clear communication from the U.S. government regarding the reasons for these actions. Both points highlight significant concerns about the treatment of this vulnerable population within the U.S. immigration system.

Community reaction

Local communities, particularly from higher education institutions, have expressed outrage and confusion regarding the government's abrupt actions. Schools like Harvard and UMass Amherst are hosting webinars to inform students about their rights, demonstrating an active response to protect affected students and restore trust within their communities.

Diverging views

Articles on the left express a greater concern for the human rights implications of student status terminations, emphasizing the emotional and societal impacts on affected individuals. In contrast, right-leaning articles tend to support the government's crackdown, framing it as necessary for national security and rule of law, with less emphasis on individual cases and hardships.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets from the left emphasized the "crackdown" and the government's "utter lack of concern," echoing Judge Reyes's sentiment and highlighting the chaos and confusion among colleges and students.
  • This divergence underscores differing priorities regarding immigration enforcement versus individual rights and the potential for overreach.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right de-emphasized the term "terminate" and specified the Trump administration's role, a detail absent from the other perspectives.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

112 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The U.S. government has detailed a crackdown on international students, explaining how it terminated the legal status of thousands without much notice, according to recent lawsuits filed by affected students.
  • Federal officials announced that they would restore legal status to international students while creating a framework for future terminations, which expanded ICE's authority, according to immigration attorney Brad Banias.
  • About 6,400 students were identified through a database search, leading to confusion and fear of deportation, as stated by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes.
  • In a recent court hearing, the Department of Homeland Security emphasized that the change in database records did not equate to an actual loss of legal status, as explained by Andre Watson.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The U.S. government recently began clarifying its policy on terminating international students' legal status.
  • This action follows a crackdown and lawsuits after students' status was canceled abruptly.
  • A new policy document issued over the weekend details reasons for cancellation, including visa revocation.
  • Officials identified around 6,400 students in a database search while attorney Brad Banias states new rules "vastly expand ICE's authority."
  • Federal officials are restoring some students' status after court challenges while developing a framework for future terminations.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. government has detailed a crackdown on international students, canceling their legal status without clear explanations, as revealed by lawsuits filed by affected students.
  • About 6,400 students were identified in a search correlating to criminal records, including Akshar Patel, whose status was reinstated after legal challenges.
  • New guidelines from the government expand ICE's authority to terminate status based on visa revocation, claimed immigration attorney Brad Banias.
  • U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes criticized the process for lacking individual review, expressing concern for the treatment of those affected.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline