Russia bans Amnesty International, calls group โ€˜undesirable organizationโ€™


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The ban

Russia has labeled Amnesty International an โ€œundesirable organization,โ€ which essentially bans the group by making any association with it a crime.

Crackdown

The ban comes amid a crackdown by the Kremlin on journalists and activists that has ramped up since Moscowโ€™s invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022.

Response

Amnesty International has yet to respond to the move, but other human rights groups have condemned Moscowโ€™s ban of the organization, accusing the Kremlin of doing it to hide human rights abuses.


Full story

Russia’s prosecutor general announced the country has banned Amnesty International, a non-governmental human rights group, on Monday, May 19. The ban came after Russian officials labeled the group an โ€œundesirable organization,โ€ which made any association with the group a crime under a 2015 law.

Part of a larger effort

The ban on the internationally recognized human rights group comes amid Russiaโ€™s crackdown on critics, journalists and activists it sees as a threat to its war against Ukraine. Moscow ramped up prosecution, along with laws against news organizations and international groups, following its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Since the Ukraine war began, Russia has banned 223 international NGOs through the country’s undesirable organizations law.

Russiaโ€™s prosecutor general said in a statement that Amnesty International is an โ€œundesirable organizationโ€ and alleged it is involved in โ€œglobal Russophobic projects.โ€

What does the ban do?

The global organization’s outlawing means the group can no longer work in Russia, and anyone who helps or supports Amnesty International is subject to prosecution. This includes anyone who shares Amnesty Internationalโ€™s reports on social media. 

What is Russia saying?

Russia also blamed Amnesty International for prolonging Moscowโ€™s war in Ukraine.

โ€œThey justify the crimes of Ukrainian neo-Nazis, call for an increase in their funding, and insist on the political economic isolation of our country,” the prosecutor general said.

Moscow has repeatedly claimed that “neo-Nazis” are influencing Ukraine, a claim that Kyiv and its Western allies refute.ย 

How are other human rights groups responding? 

Amnesty International has not responded to Russia’s ban, but other human rights organizations have, including Human Rights Watch. HRW told Sky News, the ban โ€œsimply highlights Russiaโ€™s ambition to hide the truth about human rights violations.โ€

โ€œThis designation is nothing more than an attempt by authorities to intimidate and deter Russian citizens from supporting or cooperating with this prominent, deeply respected organization,” the deputy director for the group’s Europe and Central Asia division, Rachen Denber, said.

Other international human rights groups condemned the ban and accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of doing it to hide human rights abuses, both in Ukraine and in his country.

British lawyer Peter Benenson established Amnesty International in 1961 in London. The group advocates for human rights globally, including people facing strict restrictions on free speech. Recently, the human rights organization has released reports on Russiaโ€™s war in Ukraine, accusing Moscow of crimes against humanity. Amnesty International has also criticized Russia for its repression of journalists and activists, as the Kremlin has reportedly jailed thousands of people over the years involved in activism, dissent and journalism.ย 

Not just Amnesty International

As Straight Arrow News previously reported, Russian authorities sentenced four journalists to prison terms for participating in a banned anti-corruption group linked to late-opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Navalny was a major critic of the Russian government and died while serving a 20-year sentence that his supporters said was meant to punish him for opposing Putin. The journalists vowed to appeal their sentences and said authorities prosecuted them for simply doing their job. 

The move to ban Amnesty International follows Russiaโ€™s outlawing of groups like Greenpeace and hundreds of other news outlets and human rights groups.

Alex Delia (Managing Editor), Jack Henry (Video Editor), and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Russia's decision to designate Amnesty International as an "undesirable organization" highlights escalating governmental measures to suppress independent human rights advocacy and restrict civil society activities, with potential implications for freedom of expression and international engagement in the country.

Restriction of civil society

The ban on Amnesty International reflects broader efforts by Russian authorities to curtail the activities of organizations seen as critical of the government or its policies, as noted in multiple sources.

Crackdown on dissent

According to several news reports, this action forms part of an intensified campaign since the invasion of Ukraine to silence journalists, activists and opposition groups, with legal penalties for those who cooperate with banned organizations.

Human rights advocacy

As an internationally recognized human rights group, Amnesty International has documented and criticized violations in Russia, and its removal from the country could limit external oversight and reporting on government conduct, as described by outlets such as The Associated Press and Sky News.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 20 media outlets

Context corner

The designation of โ€œundesirableโ€ follows a 2015 Russian law empowering authorities to ban foreign organizations considered a security threat. This policy accelerated after the 2022 Ukraine invasion, during which the Russian government increased efforts to curtail foreign influence and limit domestic dissent by targeting critical NGOs, independent media and groups labeled โ€œforeign agents.โ€

Debunking

Amnesty International has routinely denied advancing โ€œRussophobicโ€ agendas or supporting extremist organizations, stating its work documents human rights abuses globally, including in Ukraine, Russia and other conflict areas. Western governments and most independent observers dispute the Russian governmentโ€™s claim that Amnesty incites military escalation or supports extremism, citing a lack of substantiated evidence for those accusations.

Global impact

The ban on Amnesty International influences the global human rights community by restricting information sharing and advocacy related to Russia. It may also set a precedent affecting civil society operations in other countries with close ties to Russia. International activists believe such measures could embolden repressive policies beyond Russiaโ€™s borders, affecting global work on human rights issues.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Russiaโ€™s ban on Amnesty International chiefly as a โ€œcrackdown on dissent and activists,โ€ emphasizing repression of human rights defenders and condemning Kremlin efforts to silence independent voices, using charged terms like โ€œcrackdownโ€ and โ€œdissentโ€ to evoke a narrative of authoritarian suppression.
  • Media outlets in the center de-emphasizes polarization, offering legal context on penalties and referencing Amnestyโ€™s critiques of Russian repression without explicit condemnation.
  • Media outlets on the right adopt Russiaโ€™s official rhetoric, highlighting the โ€œundesirable organizationโ€ designation as a justified national security measure and accusing Amnesty of coordinating โ€œRussophobic projects,โ€ thereby normalizing the ban and employing emotionally coded language that suggests foreign antagonism.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

108 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Russia's Prosecutor General's Office declared Amnesty International an "undesirable" organization, stating it coordinates "Russophobic projects" funded by the Kyiv regime.
  • This designation bans Amnesty International from operating in Russia and exposes its affiliates to potential criminal prosecution.
  • Prosecutors accused Amnesty International of justifying the crimes of "Ukrainian neo-Nazis" and advocating for increased military confrontation in Ukraine.
  • More than 200 organizations are currently listed as "undesirable" in Russia, which reflects ongoing efforts to silence independent media and opposition groups.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On May 19, Russia's Prosecutor General's Office outlawed Amnesty International by labeling it an "undesirable organization" and banning its operations inside Russia.
  • The decision follows a 2015 Russian law criminalizing involvement with undesirable groups and intensified government crackdowns after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
  • Amnesty Internationalโ€™s London office was accused of serving as a center for "global Russophobic projects" aimed at Russiaโ€™s political and economic isolation amid its reports on human rights violations in Ukraine.
  • Russiaโ€™s list of undesirable organizations includes over 200 entities, such as independent media and opposition groups, exposing affiliates to penalties of up to five years in prison.
  • The designation effectively silences Amnesty International in Russia and risks significant criminal prosecution for anyone associating with the group, signaling a broader suppression of dissent.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Russia's prosecutor general has banned Amnesty International Limited, calling it an "undesirable organization" for allegedly supporting Ukraine against Russia.
  • The prosecutor general alleged that Amnesty International Limited's London office is a "centre for the preparation of global Russophobic projects."
  • Amnesty International is accused of intensifying military confrontation and justifying the actions of Ukrainian neo-Nazis according to the Russian statement.
  • Working with or funding designated "undesirable organizations" can lead to penalties of up to five years in prison under Russian law.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™