,

California lawmakers weaken proposed punishment for teen sex solicitation


Summary

CA lawmakers block provision

California lawmakers blocked a provision in Assembly Bill 379 that would have made it a felony to purchase sex from 16 and 17-year-olds.

Parts of bill advance

Parts of the bill advancing victim support and anti-loitering measures moved forward.

Critics cite language of bill

Critics raised concerns about over-criminalization and unintended consequences, while committee leaders urged a cautious approach to legal changes.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

CA lawmakers block provision

California lawmakers blocked a provision in Assembly Bill 379 that would have made it a felony to purchase sex from 16 and 17-year-olds.

Parts of bill advance

Parts of the bill advancing victim support and anti-loitering measures moved forward.

Critics cite language of bill

Critics raised concerns about over-criminalization and unintended consequences, while committee leaders urged a cautious approach to legal changes.


Full story

California lawmakers in the Assembly Public Safety Committee blocked an effort that would have made soliciting 16 and 17-year-olds for sex a felony. Former prosecutor and current Democratic Assemblymember Maggy Krell proposed Assembly Bill 379, saying perpetrators who sell or buy children for sex deserve harsher punishment.

Last year, the Golden State passed a measure making it a felony to purchase children 15 and younger for sex. That law went into effect in January.

Portions of AB 379 advance

Parts of Krell’s bill did move forward. If AB 379 becomes law, it would still criminalize those who loiter to purchase teens for sex and establish a fund to support victims of sex trafficking.

However, the provision that would have made it a felony to solicit sex from older children was removed in order to allow the bill to move forward.

Krell responds to amendment

“I disagree with that amendment,” Krell said during the committee hearing. “I needed to take it to get this hearing. I’m grateful for the hearing and I accept the amendment and I look forward to working with the committee –– including Assemblymember [Tom] Lackey, whose comments I really appreciated –– to make sure that we bring another bill to protect 16 and 17-year-olds who are being purchased for sex. They’re victims.”

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

In 2020, 89% of victims in active sex trafficking cases were between 14 and 17 years old, according to the DOJ

Critics express concerns

Critics of the bill’s provision argue that it could have led to criminal charges against teenagers involved in consensual relationships –– particularly those who are in LGBTQ+ or interracial relationships and have parents who disapprove.

“There were a lot of youth advocates and activists who were concerned about the way that automatic felonies levied against older teens in relationships with other minors,” said Leela Chapelle, with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST), as reported by  KXTV.

Representatives with CAST spoke to VanGuard News Group and say the bill is also likely to target certain people as it makes “loitering” a crime, once again. CAST argues people driving around the wrong neighborhood or those walking down the street could get arrested if an officer considers it to be “loitering.” 

“AB 379 repeats the failed ‘end demand’ strategy that too often results in the arrest and criminalization of people selling sex—including those who are being trafficked—while ignoring the root causes of exploitation,” according to CAST.

Committee chairman cites caution

Assemblymember Nick Shultz, the Democratic chairman of the committee, made the ultimate decision to move the bill forward with the amendment. He says he wants to see how cases are prosecuted under the new law before changing it again.

“While I fully understand and empathize with the author’s desire to change the law,” Shultz said during the hearing, “I think it would be more wise to see how cases get prosecuted under this new statutory framework to identify what is working and what is not.”

Krell pledges to keep fighting

Krell says she won’t stop fighting and she’ll reintroduce the bill every year until it passes in order to protect children.

Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

A debate over proposed legislation in California to combat child sex trafficking highlights political divisions on how to best protect minors from exploitation.

Legislation conflict

Lawmakers are divided on how to effectively address child sex trafficking without creating unintended consequences.

Inadvertent felons

Some advocates feared a felony provision in the original bill would lead to charges against some young adults in consensual relationships, especially among LGBTQ+ or interracial couples with disapproving parents.

Political accountability

The debate has centered on political accountability as both sides say they want to protect vulnerable populations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 61 media outlets

Common ground

Both sides agree on the need to protect minors from sexual exploitation and recognize the serious issue of sex trafficking. There is bipartisan support for legislation aimed at improving the resources available for survivors and enhancing penalties for soliciting minors for sex. Notably, active lawmaking efforts are underway, reflecting the importance of this issue in California.

Debunking

Claims that increasing penalties against solicitors will prevent sex trafficking have been questioned; evidence suggests that simply raising penalties does not effectively mitigate trafficking issues. Many experts advocate for a holistic approach that addresses root causes over punitive measures that often fail to protect the intended groups.

Underreported

The long-term effects and experiences of survivors of sex trafficking are often omitted in discussions. While the legislation acknowledges the need for victim support, the complexities of their rehabilitation and the systemic issues surrounding trafficking need comprehensive coverage and deeper exploration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

65 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™