Right Media Miss

North Carolina judges issue mixed ruling on governor’s appointment powers



This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 12% is from right-leaning media.

62% left coverage12% right coverage

North Carolina judges issued a mixed ruling regarding Gov. Josh Stein’s appointment powers, impacting his ability to fill judicial vacancies and other positions on state boards. The judges unanimously struck down a portion of a law that limited the governor’s authority to fill vacancies in higher courts as unconstitutional.

However, the judges upheld provisions that reduce some of Stein’s appointments to key state boards, like the Utilities Commission and Building Code Council.

Stein stated on social platform X that the ruling on judicial vacancies “maintains our state’s separation of powers.”

Discover reporting you’re not seeing from biased, mainstream media outlets.

Using our real-time Media Miss™ tool powered by Ground News, we spotlight stories that right-leaning and left-leaning news outlets aren’t covering to bring you a complete picture of the news.

Learn more about how Media Miss™ works.

Media Landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

21 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • North Carolina judges issued a mixed ruling regarding Governor Josh Stein's appointment powers, impacting his ability to fill judicial vacancies and other positions on state boards.
  • The judges unanimously struck down a portion of a law that limited the governor's choice for filling vacancies in higher courts as unconstitutional.
  • However, the judges upheld provisions that reduce some of Stein's appointments to key state boards, like the Utilities Commission and Building Code Council.
  • Stein stated on social platform X that the ruling on judicial vacancies 'maintains our state's separation of powers.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, a group of trial judges in Wake County declared parts of North Carolina legislation that restrict Governor Josh Stein's appointment powers unconstitutional, while upholding other sections.
  • These rulings follow Republican-led legislative changes passed last December that seek to reduce the governor's authority over judicial and state board appointments.
  • The panel unanimously invalidated restrictions on Stein’s authority to appoint members to the state Supreme Court, which has seven seats, and the 15-seat Court of Appeals, while permitting provisions that shift some appointment powers to the state treasurer and legislative leaders to stay in effect.
  • Republican Treasurer Brad Briner, supporting the law, stated that the ruling confirms the governor does not have overriding control over other elected Council of State members in fulfilling their executive duties, while Stein's lawyer referenced legal experts who argue that Stein possesses unrestricted appointment powers.
  • The decision maintains limitations on the governor’s ability to appoint members to certain state regulatory boards and indicates that disputes regarding appointment authority are expected to persist.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™