JD Vance doesn’t add much to Trump ticket


At the 2024 Republican National Convention, GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump selected Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, as his running mate. With Trump expected to win Ohio in the Electoral College, some observers have questioned why Trump ultimately decided on Vance. One explanation is that Vance said he would have helped Trump overturn the results of the 2020 election to remain in power after losing, suggesting that Vance may be willing to help Trump stage another coup in the future.

Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman discusses J.D. Vance’s pros and cons and gives his best impression of who he thinks Vance really is behind the scenes.


Be the first to know when David Pakman publishes a new opinion every Monday! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!


The following is an excerpt from the above video:

Now, the most interesting aspect to me about this, in general, is that I don’t think J.D. Vance really does anything for Trump, as far as helping him gain new votes in the net. J.D. Vance is from Ohio, a state that Trump will almost certainly win regardless. And if he wins by a slightly bigger margin because he has J.D. Vance, I don’t think it makes a whole hell of a difference. On the other hand, J.D. Vance doesn’t expand the electorate elsewhere because he’s basically a 40-years-younger Trump type, not as bombastic, which is part of what Trump likes, but as far as policy is concerned, so I don’t think that there’s an expansion for Trump of the electorate for that reason.

And then thirdly, we get to the real reasons that Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance, which mostly have to do with personality, and the fact that Trump doesn’t want someone who’s going to get all the attention. Marjorie Taylor Greene, as VP, would get a ton of attention. She would suck up attention. Trump doesn’t want that. Trump wants a doormat who will meet Trump’s definition of loyalty.

J.D. Vance previously said if he had been VP instead of Mike Pence, in January of 2021, he would have sent the election back to the states, which is not really a thing, but it’s code for “I would have done the thing Trump wanted Pence to do but wasn’t willing to do.” Pence was not a total doormat loyalist, not that I was a fan of his, but he was not a total dork doormat loyalist. But J.D. Vance is, and it’s complete and total opportunism.