There have now been four flying objects shot down by the U.S. military in just over a week, with the first one identified as a Chinese surveillance balloon outfitted with sensors used for intelligence gathering. Though Beijing continues to deny it was a spy vessel, the incident has further strained its ties with Washington and resulted in U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken postponing a trip to China.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues a Chinese spy balloon breaching U.S. airspace should have prompted a more purposeful and effective response from President Biden.
China neither fears nor respects America under a compromised Joe Biden. So no one should have been surprised when Beijing brazenly breached our airspace, sending a spy balloon capable of delivering an EMP or hypersonic missile soaring over our most sensitive sites on the eve of a high profile U.S.-China meeting.
This was a power play pure and simple, but it also likely aimed to test our reflexes and resolve. Nor should anyone have been surprised that a Biden administration that has repeatedly kowtowedto China failed this test. Still, baffling aspects of Biden’s feckless response raise questions maybe more troubling than whatever China might have gleaned from the balloon, and about our defensive capabilities in response to it.
Among them, would the Biden administration have ever shot down the spy balloon had civilians not seen it?
Per Bloomberg, Biden administration officials were aware the Chinese balloon had entered U.S. airspace several days before the public, but were intent on “keeping it on the down-low” with the Blinken-Xi Jinping pow-wow at stake.
Officials were reportedly concerned about “a heated political environment ahead of 2024 elections, with Republicans agitating on which party could strike a harder or tougher line on China.” So Team Biden kept the breach of our sovereignty hush-hush for political reasons it would seem.
Only when those pesky Montanans identified the balloon was the administration forced to respond.
The Pentagon reassured us the balloon didn’t pose a threat, and was of “limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective.”
So this was no big deal – and balloons breached our airspace under Trump, too, we were told. Only after the balloon was shot down did Biden say he always wanted to shoot it down.
But that Biden did not strike the spy balloon the second it entered our airspace; that initial reporting on White House deliberations emphasized their political focus; and that the administration downplayed the danger of the balloon and cast its incursion as commonplace, call into question his candor.
China neither fears nor respects America under a compromised Joe Biden. So no one should have been surprised when Beijing brazenly breached our airspace, sending a spy balloon capable of delivering an EMP or hypersonic missile soaring over our most sensitive sites on the eve of a high profile U.S.-China meeting.
This was a power play. But it also likely aimed to test our reflexes and resolve. Nor should anyone have been surprised that a Biden administration that has repeatedly kowtowedto China failed this test. Still, baffling aspects of Biden’s feckless response raise questions maybe more troubling than whatever China might have gleaned from the balloon, and about our defensive capabilities.
Among them, would the Biden administration have ever shot down the spy balloon had civilians not seen it?
Per Bloomberg, Biden administration officials were aware the Chinese balloon had entered U.S. airspace several days before the public, but were intent on “keeping it on the down-low” with the Blinken-Xi Jinping pow-wow at stake.
Officials were reportedly concerned about “a heated political environment ahead of 2024 elections, with Republicans agitating on which party could strike a harder or tougher line on China.” So Team Biden kept the breach of our sovereignty hush-hush for political reasons.
OFF-CAMERA NARRATOR: Well, hello everbody. I am sitting in my driveway in Billings, Montana and right there is a ground-stop on our airport and this thing is up in the sky.
Only when those pesky Montanans identified the balloon was the administration forced to respond.
The Pentagon reassured us the balloon didn’t pose a threat, and was of “limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective.”
So this was no big deal – and balloons breached our airspace under Trump too, we were told. Only after the balloon was shot down, did Biden say he always wanted to shoot it down.
But that Biden did not strike the spy balloon the second it entered our airspace; that initial reporting on White House deliberations emphasized its political focus; and that the administration downplayed the danger of the balloon and cast its incursion as commonplace, call into question his candor.
Second question: Why did Biden let the balloon traverse the entire U.S.?
The rationale for not shooting down the balloon after it entered our airspace was one of fear that those on the ground could be harmed. But this is dumbfounding when you consider the argument was made when it was known the balloon was traveling over the third most sparsely-populated state by density in the country. Do we really lack the capability to safely pop a balloon over a state with fewer than 8 people per square mile? Instead, the Biden administration let the vehicle surveil the country unimpeded.
That it was shot down, sending its pieces flying, only after emerging over the Atlantic Ocean, necessitated a seemingly complex recovery effort on the water’s shifting surface and beneath it. According to the Pentagon, “it’s possible that some debris could escape notice and wash ashore.”
Another question: Is the related claim there was a national security benefit to letting the balloon fly legitimate?
Two days after the balloon was shot down, NORAD’s Commander claimed letting the balloon fly gave intelligence officials “the opportunity to assess what they were actually doing, what kind of capabilities existed on the balloon, what kind of transmission capabilities existed.” But did the benefits outweigh the costs? Couldn’t officials have assessed the balloon’s capabilities and then promptly shot it down, rather than risk potential compromise of our military sites? Is this just rationalization after the fact?
Did American forces really fail to detect previous balloon breaches?
If so – as has been claimed – that calls into question the entire integrity of our air defenses. If not, and top administration officials during the Trump years were kept in the dark about balloon violations of our sovereignty – for any reason – those officials having been totally blindsided by such claims, this would constitute unconscionable insubordination.
Lastly, what role did Gen. Milley play in all this?
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reportedly advised President Biden not to shoot down the spy balloon as it floated over America.
His position is worthy of scrutiny given what we know about his posture towards China. Remember, in the waning days of the Trump presidency, Gen. Milley told his Chinese counterpart “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.” He reportedly added, “If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”
The general claimed he was seeking to defuse hostilities between the U.S. and China – that intelligence indicated China believed a U.S. attack might be imminent.
Trump said he was totally unaware of these calls, and that if reporting was true, the general should be tried for treason. Gen. Milley in the past has said that China “is not an enemy.”
Congress ought to ask him about his role in spy balloon deliberations, what he might have communicated to his Chinese counterparts, and whether he acted in America’s national interest.
Ben Weingarten
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Ben
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Chinese housing overbuild may erode support for Xi Jinping
20 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Americans debate government shutdowns, spending priorities
23 hrs ago
Dr. Frank Luntz
Will China invade Taiwan as a diversion?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
What will happen if Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov dies?
Monday
Peter Zeihan
Troubling questions raised by Biden’s response to China spy balloon
Feb 14
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
There have now been four flying objects shot down by the U.S. military in just over a week, with the first one identified as a Chinese surveillance balloon outfitted with sensors used for intelligence gathering. Though Beijing continues to deny it was a spy vessel, the incident has further strained its ties with Washington and resulted in U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken postponing a trip to China.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues a Chinese spy balloon breaching U.S. airspace should have prompted a more purposeful and effective response from President Biden.
China neither fears nor respects America under a compromised Joe Biden. So no one should have been surprised when Beijing brazenly breached our airspace, sending a spy balloon capable of delivering an EMP or hypersonic missile soaring over our most sensitive sites on the eve of a high profile U.S.-China meeting.
This was a power play. But it also likely aimed to test our reflexes and resolve. Nor should anyone have been surprised that a Biden administration that has repeatedly kowtowed to China failed this test. Still, baffling aspects of Biden’s feckless response raise questions maybe more troubling than whatever China might have gleaned from the balloon, and about our defensive capabilities.
Among them, would the Biden administration have ever shot down the spy balloon had civilians not seen it?
Per Bloomberg, Biden administration officials were aware the Chinese balloon had entered U.S. airspace several days before the public, but were intent on “keeping it on the down-low” with the Blinken-Xi Jinping pow-wow at stake.
Officials were reportedly concerned about “a heated political environment ahead of 2024 elections, with Republicans agitating on which party could strike a harder or tougher line on China.” So Team Biden kept the breach of our sovereignty hush-hush for political reasons.
OFF-CAMERA NARRATOR: Well, hello everbody. I am sitting in my driveway in Billings, Montana and right there is a ground-stop on our airport and this thing is up in the sky.
Only when those pesky Montanans identified the balloon was the administration forced to respond.
The Pentagon reassured us the balloon didn’t pose a threat, and was of “limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective.”
So this was no big deal – and balloons breached our airspace under Trump too, we were told. Only after the balloon was shot down, did Biden say he always wanted to shoot it down.
But that Biden did not strike the spy balloon the second it entered our airspace; that initial reporting on White House deliberations emphasized its political focus; and that the administration downplayed the danger of the balloon and cast its incursion as commonplace, call into question his candor.
Second question: Why did Biden let the balloon traverse the entire U.S.?
The rationale for not shooting down the balloon after it entered our airspace was one of fear that those on the ground could be harmed. But this is dumbfounding when you consider the argument was made when it was known the balloon was traveling over the third most sparsely-populated state by density in the country. Do we really lack the capability to safely pop a balloon over a state with fewer than 8 people per square mile? Instead, the Biden administration let the vehicle surveil the country unimpeded.
That it was shot down, sending its pieces flying, only after emerging over the Atlantic Ocean, necessitated a seemingly complex recovery effort on the water’s shifting surface and beneath it. According to the Pentagon, “it’s possible that some debris could escape notice and wash ashore.”
Another question: Is the related claim there was a national security benefit to letting the balloon fly legitimate?
Two days after the balloon was shot down, NORAD’s Commander claimed letting the balloon fly gave intelligence officials “the opportunity to assess what they were actually doing, what kind of capabilities existed on the balloon, what kind of transmission capabilities existed.” But did the benefits outweigh the costs? Couldn’t officials have assessed the balloon’s capabilities and then promptly shot it down, rather than risk potential compromise of our military sites? Is this just rationalization after the fact?
Did American forces really fail to detect previous balloon breaches?
If so – as has been claimed – that calls into question the entire integrity of our air defenses. If not, and top administration officials during the Trump years were kept in the dark about balloon violations of our sovereignty – for any reason – those officials having been totally blindsided by such claims, this would constitute unconscionable insubordination.
Lastly, what role did Gen. Milley play in all this?
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reportedly advised President Biden not to shoot down the spy balloon as it floated over America.
His position is worthy of scrutiny given what we know about his posture towards China. Remember, in the waning days of the Trump presidency, Gen. Milley told his Chinese counterpart “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.” He reportedly added, “If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”
The general claimed he was seeking to defuse hostilities between the U.S. and China – that intelligence indicated China believed a U.S. attack might be imminent.
Trump said he was totally unaware of these calls, and that if reporting was true, the general should be tried for treason. Gen. Milley in the past has said that China “is not an enemy.”
Congress ought to ask him about his role in spy balloon deliberations, what he might have communicated to his Chinese counterparts, and whether he acted in America’s national interest.
Charges against Hunter Biden are a head fake
Republican inquiries into President Joe Biden have focused frequently on the activities of his son, Hunter Biden. While these inquiries are wide-ranging, the Department of Justice recently charged Hunter Biden with three federal firearm offenses following the collapse of an expected settlement. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues that these charges represent only the
Yesterday
Seven reasons why Biden impeachment inquiry has merit
According to a Harvard University CAPS/Harris poll, voters are evenly split 50-50 on whether the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden is justified or not. The responses exhibit a clear partisan divide, with roughly three-quarters of Republicans considering it legitimate, but the same percentage of Democrats regarding it as politically motivated. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben
Sep 19
Left’s assault on Supreme Court an attempt to discourage Trump
Using a 14th Amendment clause, a left-leaning group in Colorado is arguing that former President Donald Trump should be kept off the presidential ballot. This clause disqualifies individuals who have “engaged in an insurrection or rebellion” from seeking higher office. Such challenges may arise in other states, potentially leading to Supreme Court involvement. Straight Arrow
Sep 12
US green energy transition benefits red China
Given the growing concern over climate change, there’s been more and more focus on the possibilities and potential of green energy. Many of the material components necessary for that transition, however, come from China, and that puts the United States in a bind. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues that U.S. green energy goals
Sep 5
Is Biden and DOJ conflict an act to protect the administration?
Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed David Weiss as special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden after his plea deal fell apart. Without a plea agreement, the Department of Justice’s case against Biden’s son may be headed for a criminal trial. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten wonders whether the DOJ’s recent decisions are aimed at shielding
Aug 29
Stories each side is underreporting
Russia To Hike Defence Spending By Almost 70 Percent In 2024: Ministry
21 sources | 8% from the left
Only 2 Toronto restaurants were awarded Michelin stars this year
21 sources | 18% from the right
Latest Opinions
Getty Images
Hyundai and Kia recall 3.3M vehicles over fire risk, tell drivers to ‘park outside’
Watch :55
1 hr ago
Getty Images
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
Watch 1:14
1 hr ago
AP
Candidates clash at 2nd GOP primary debate: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 28, 2023
Watch 7:33
2 hrs ago
@NYCMayor via X
NYPD deploys K5 robot to patrol subway station
Watch 3:10
17 hrs ago
Getty Images
Poll: More Americans would blame Republicans for government shutdown
Watch 2:19
18 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
High housing mortgage costs are a risk to whole economy
21 hrs ago
Newt Gingrich
Stop blaming Hutchinson for alleged Giuliani groping
22 hrs ago
Adrienne Lawrence
Charges against Hunter Biden are a head fake
Yesterday
Ben Weingarten
Biden’s hardline immigration policies too similar to Trump’s
Yesterday
Ruben Navarrette
Politics
Candidates clash at 2nd GOP primary debate: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 28, 2023
2 hrs ago
Poll: More Americans would blame Republicans for government shutdown
House, Senate vote on bills as government shutdown looms: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 27, 2023
AP
U.S.
NYPD deploys K5 robot to patrol subway station
17 hrs ago
Booming home-schooling movement shifts from religious to more diverse: poll
New Orleans braces for saltwater intrusion impacting drinking supply
@NYCMayor via X
International
Cuban officials call Molotov cocktail attack on its US embassy terrorism
Tuesday
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Reuters
Tech
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
1 hr ago
Ford pauses construction on $3.5 billion EV battery plant
NASA: Asteroid sample from 200 million miles away lands in Utah
Getty Images