All opinions expressed in this article are solely the opinions of the contributors.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal government agencies began corresponding with private social media companies like Facebook to regulate sensitive public health information and to suppress certain COVID-19 misinformation which they believed could present an existential threat to U.S. public health. Some Americans felt that this relationship went too far, however, saying that it violated the First Amendment rights of American citizens.
In the ensuing litigation of Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court ruled in defense of U.S. federal agencies, upholding their behavior as constitutional. In his dissent, Justice Alito warned that the court’s decision infringes upon the sovereignty of the free marketplace of ideas, and that it could set dangerous precedents for future violations of the First Amendment even outside of emergency scenarios.
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten recaps Alito’s dissent and urges President Trump and Congress to defend First Amendment rights.
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
Chief Justice John Roberts’s year-end report for 2024 indicated that he considers disinformation a key threat to the court and believes there must be widespread national action to combat it. This only further augers poorly for our rights.
Consequently, as I recently detailed in a report, the Trump administration’s plans to defund and dismantle the censorship-industrial complex and the support of some Republicans in Congress to codify these efforts are crucial. The court simply cannot be seen as a reliable backstop for protecting our First Amendment rights against the censorship regime. What’s more, if Republicans allow the Fed-led censorship regime to persist, there will be no deterrent to Democrat efforts to create analogous such regimes going forward, targeting rights beyond those enshrined in the First Amendment.
Americans may get a reprieve from a government weaponized against political dissenters for the next four, eight or even 12 years, but to make these changes durable, long-lasting, the Trump administration and Congress must step in and act where the courts are likely to fail us so.
Be the first to know when Ben Weingarten publishes a new commentary every Tuesday!
Download the Straight Arrow News app and follow Ben to receive push notifications.