Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons aim to restore liberty, justice


President Trump has defended his decision to issue pardons and halt prosecutions for the more than 1,500 individuals charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack. The pardons included violent extremists who had been convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers and of plotting sedition against the United States. Some Republicans — and even some of those who received the pardons themselves — disagreed sharply with the president’s decision to issue blanket pardons, while other Republicans defended it or abstained from commenting one way or the other.

Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues that Trump’s pardons took courage and could signal what he calls “the beginning of the end of the War on Wrongthink.”

QR code for SAN app download Headshot of Ben Weingarten

Be the first to know when Ben Weingarten publishes a new commentary every Tuesday!

Download the Straight Arrow News app and follow Ben to receive push notifications.

The administration weighed the acts against the leniency granted to BLM and antifa protesters during the summer of 2020 who assaulted cops, murdered people, and burned down cities; it weighed them against the collective guilt heaped on and hostility with which judges treated the defendants in D.C.; against the fact defendants lacked full evidence and other due process protections to defend themselves; that they couldn’t get a fair trial before a jury of their peers as MAGA supporters in Washington; that judges wouldn’t let defendants change venues; it considered the twisting and torturing of the “obstruction of an official proceeding charge” hung around the neck of protesters; the fact many were held in pretrial detention for months on end — some without criminal records — and subjected to alleged abuse; and the challenges of judging people’s offenses that day given the presence of informants who may have entrapped some, and the reported provocations if not brutality of certain cops.

When weighing those factors, plus the time already served — on top of the disentangling of the cases, which as a prudential matter would serve as a huge drag on the justice system — the president made the politically incorrect call to say enough is enough.

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.