Skip to main content
Energy

US plan to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050 faces financial concerns

Share

The Biden administration announced a new energy initiative to expand U.S. nuclear capacity to 200 gigawatts by 2050. That’s a 200% increase over 2020 levels, with enough power to meet the electricity needs of up to 170 million homes. The plan includes building new reactors, renewing licenses for older plants, and restarting some retired facilities, though questions remain about the potential costs and timelines of these projects.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 36% Center 27% Right 36%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“Expanding domestic nuclear energy production has a key role to play in helping to avoid the worst impacts of climate change by enabling the nation to achieve a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission economy no later than 2050,” the White House said in a statement. “Nuclear power delivers safe, clean, reliable, and affordable electricity to communities across the nation.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Building new reactors can be a lengthy and expensive process. In 2023, the first newly constructed U.S. nuclear plant in decades came online. However, it was completed seven years behind schedule and $17 billion over budget.

Small modular reactors (SMRs) have been proposed as a more cost-effective option for nuclear power expansion. However, even larger SMRs can cost around $3 billion. Additionally, the first government-approved SMR project in the U.S. was ultimately canceled due to high costs.

“For nuclear reactor-grade suppliers, there are rigorous and costly training and quality assurance requirements,” the federal government said while unveiling its recently set nuclear objectives. “Consequently, it should be noted that nuclear reactor-quality materials and components tend to be significantly more expensive than their non-nuclear-grade equivalents.”

Restarting older reactors can also require a significant investment of time and finances. While the government is already pursuing plans to bring back reactors at sites like Three Mile Island, as well as facilities in Michigan and Iowa, all of these initiatives are projected to take years and billions of dollars to complete.

Additionally, some uncertainty remains around whether the incoming Trump administration will continue to support this expansion of U.S. nuclear energy. However, President-elect Donald Trump has stated he “will support nuclear energy production” by “working to keep existing power plants open, and investing in innovative small modular reactors.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION HAS RELEASED A NEW PLAN TO DEPLOY 200 GIGAWATTS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY CAPACITY BY 20-50.

 

THAT’D BE A 200 PERCENT INCREASE OVER 20-20 LEVELS-

AND PROVIDE ENOUGH ELECTRICITY TO POWER UP TO 170 MILLION HOMES.

 

WHILE THIS INITIATIVE MIGHT LINE UP WITH PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMP’S AGENDA-

CONCERNS REMAIN OVER HOW MUCH THESE PROJECTS WILL COST.

 

TO ACHIEVE ITS NUCLEAR GOALS, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS CALLING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW REACTORS, LARGE AND SMALL-

AS WELL AS A RENEWAL OF LICENSES TO EXTEND THE LIVES OF OLDER FACILITIES, AND THE RESTARTING OF ONES THAT HAVE BEEN RETIRED.

 

HOWEVER, BUILDING ADDITIONAL REACTORS CAN BE A LONG AND COSTLY PROCESS.

 

IN 20-23, THE FIRST NEW U.S. NUCLEAR PLANT IN DECADES CAME ONLINE-

SEVEN YEARS PAST ITS ORIGINAL DEADLINE AND 17 BILLION DOLLARS OVER BUDGET.

 

SMALL MODULE REACTORS, OR SMRS, HAVE BEEN BILLED AS WAY CHEAPER WAY TO CONSTRUCT NUCLEAR POWER INFRASTRUCTURE.

 

BUT EVEN THESE FACILITIES CAN RUN AROUND THREE BILLION DOLLARS FOR LARGER UNITS-

AND THE FIRST GOVERNMENT APPROVED PLAN TO BUILD ONE IN THE STATES WAS ULTIMATELY CANCELED DUE TO HIGH COSTS.

 

AS FOR RESTARTING OLDER REACTORS – THERE ARE SEVERAL PROJECTS ALREADY UNDERWAY.

 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS LOOKING TO GET THREE MILE ISLAND, AS WELL AS SITES IN MICHIGAN AND IOWA, TO START PRODUCING NUCLEAR ENERGY AGAIN-

PLANS WHICH ARE ALL EXPECTED TO TAKE YEARS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO MAKE HAPPEN. 

 

UNCERTAINTY ALSO REMAINS AROUND WHETHER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WILL WORK TO ADVANCE THESE RECENTLY SET NUCLEAR OBJECTIVES.

 

THOUGH THE INCOMING PRESIDENT HAS STATED HE INTENDS TO SUPPORT NUCLEAR ENERGY PRODUCTION-

WORKING TO KEEP EXISTING POWER PLANTS OPEN, AND INVESTING IN SMALL MODULAR REACTORS.

 

TO GET MORE STORIES ABOUT THE ROLE NUCLEAR POWER IS PLAYING IN THE RENEWABLE ENERGY TRANSITION, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP AND SIGN UP FOR ALERTS FROM ME- JACK AYLMER.