Skip to main content
Tech

47 defendants added to lawsuit as Florida surgeon general’s tweet blocked

Share

According to a press release from Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, he and Missouri Attorney Eric Schmitt have added 47 defendants to a lawsuit accusing the federal government of colluding with social media companies to censor freedom of speech. According to the press release, the additional defendants include “top officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the White House, and others.”

Names listed on the press release include:

  • Top White House officials Andy Slavitt and Rob Flaherty.
  • White House Counsel Dana Remus.
  • FBI Section Chief for the Foreign Influence Task Force Laura Dehmlow.
  • CDC Deputy Communications Director Kate Galatas.

“Throughout this case, we have uncovered a disturbing amount of collusion between Big Tech and Big Government,” Attorney General Landry said in a statement. “This egregious attack on our First Amendment will be met with an equally full-hearted defense of the rights of the American people.”

The added defendants to the social media lawsuit were announced just a day after Twitter restored a previously-blocked tweet from Florida Surgeon General Joe Lapado. The tweet promoted an analysis claiming a high incidence of cardiac-related deaths among men who take the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

“This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination,” the Florida Department of Health said in a bulletin last Friday. “With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group.”

With the tweet came new guidance from Lapado for Floridians. He advised against COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for men aged 18-39.

The guidance, as well as the analysis, was questioned by other medical experts in the state. They argue the analysis relies on imperfect data and does little to explain its methodology.

“It’s not a complete picture,” Jason Salemi, an epidemiologist at the University of South Florida, told the Tampa Bay Times. “It’s taking one part of it and using that seemingly in isolation to make a recommendation.”

Politico contributed to this report.

Tags: , , ,

CENSORSHIP OF SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT HAS BEEN A HOT TOPIC.
THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ONLY ESCALATING THE CONVERSATION ON “WHO HAS THE POWER TO CENSOR WHAT.”
A GROUP OF ATTORNEYS GENERAL SAY SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES HAVE INFRINGED ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT…WITH THE HELP OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL JEFF LANDRY AND ERIC SCHMIDT ARE LEADING A ‘LANDMARK LAWSUIT.’
SEVERAL STATE LEADERS GOING AFTER BIG TECH AND BIG GOVERNMENT…
THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THE GOVERNMENT WAS HELPING TO DECIDE WHAT COVID-19 INFORMATION SHOULD BE CENSORED OUT.
THEY’RE NAMING A STAGGERING 67 DEFENDANTS IN THE SUIT…RANGING FROM WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS TO C-D-C EMPLOYEES.
THE TIMING OF IT COMES AS TWITTER JUST CENSORED FLORIDA STATE’S SURGEON GENERAL LAST WEEK FOR A POST ON COVID DATA.
THE TWEET IN QUESTION WAS ABOUT RESULTS FROM A STUDY WHICH FOUND MEN AGES 18 TO 39 HAVE AN 84 PERCENT INCREASED RISK OF CARDIAC-RELATED DEATH WITHIN 28 DAYS OF TAKING THE VACCINE.
THE FLORIDA SURGEON GENERAL RECOMMENDING AGAINST THE SHOT FOR THIS DEMOGRAPHIC.
TWITTER REVERSED IT’S BLOCK ON THE STATE OFFICIAL’S ACCOUNT A FEW DAYS LATER.
FLORIDA SAID THE STUDY IS BACKED BY ANALYSIS.
OTHER EXPERTS ARGUE AGAINST ITS FINDINGS…SAYING IT’S LIMITED IN SCOPE.
THE POINT OF THE LAWSUIT…IS THIS TYPE OF DEBATE SHOULD BE WELCOMED AND NOT CENSORED OUT.