SCOTUS reviews whether S. Carolina targeted Black voters in gerrymandering case
By Lauren Taylor (Reporter), Zachary Hill (Editor)
Media Landscape
See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this dataBias Distribution
Left
New Racial Gerrymandering Case Before Supreme Court, Months After Last One Decided
Click to see story on HuffPostUS Supreme Court to hear racial gerrymandering case
Click to see story on Raw StorySupreme Court hears South Carolina case that may make it harder to challenge GOP racial gerrymanders
Click to see story on Daily KosArguments On South Carolina’s Maps Show How Thoroughly Supreme Court Broke Redistricting
Click to see story on Talking Points MemoSupreme court to review whether South Carolina map discriminated against Black voters
Click to see story on The GuardianThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on Associated Press NewsThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on abc NewsSupreme Court to consider South Carolina GOP’s ‘bleaching’ of Black voters out of Rep. Nancy Mace’s district
Click to see story on CNNSupreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering dispute
Click to see story on CBS NewsSouth Carolina redistricting case could add Democratic House seats
Click to see story on nprThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Star TribuneSupreme Court weighs South Carolina racial gerrymandering dispute
Click to see story on NBC NewsThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Coast ReporterThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Rocky Mountain OutlookSupreme Court likely to side with South Carolina GOP in racial gerrymandering case
Click to see story on PoliticoLISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears case about gerrymandering against Black voters in South Carolina
Click to see story on PBS NewsHourThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on NBC WashingtonIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on The HeraldSupreme Court signals support for Republican-leaning congressional district in SC – Maryland Daily Record
Click to see story on Maryland Daily RecordConservative justices suggest South Carolina GOP gerrymandering was based on politics, not race
Click to see story on KRDOThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KIFISupreme Court conservatives cast doubt on South Carolina racial gerrymander
Click to see story on The HillThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KVIANancy Mace’s seat under scrutiny in supreme court gerrymandering case
Click to see story on NewsweekThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Winnipeg Free PressThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on News 4 JAXThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WPLGSupreme Court of Canada session to hear arguments on secret trials, FN land dispute
Click to see story on The Globe & MailThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on WKMGThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Click on DetroitThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on The Post and CourierThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on San Diego Union TribuneThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Sask TodayThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WCBDThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on The ColumbianU.S. Supreme Court to take up SC redistricting case this week
Click to see story on WLTXIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on The StateSupreme Court to hear arguments on use of race in South Carolina congressional map
Click to see story on Roll CallU.S. Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WBTWThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KGETSCOTUS reviews whether S. Carolina targeted Black voters in gerrymandering case
Click to see story on Straight Arrow News10/9 NEWSBREAK: U.S. Supreme Court to hear S.C. redistricting case this week – Charleston City Paper
Click to see story on Charleston City PaperIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on myrtlebeachonline.comJustices signal support for a Republican-leaning S.C. district – Minnesota Lawyer
Click to see story on minnlawyer.comThe Supreme Court Signals Support For A Republican-leaning Congressional District In South Carolina
Click to see story on News18 IndiaSupreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Washington TimesThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on MY NorthwestRight
Untracked Bias
The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on My Mother LodeThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Airdrie City ViewS.C. Congressional redistricting map to be challenged in U.S. Supreme Court – ABC Columbia
Click to see story on ABC ColumbiaIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on islandpacket.comSupreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on tnledger.comThe United States Supreme Court is hearing from South Carolina officials Wednesday, Oct. 11, as they defend a congressional district map drawn by Republicans. The map was blocked by a panel of three federal judges who said the state unconstitutionally moved Black voters from one district to another. In the ruling, the panel said that South Carolina Republicans purposely moved 30,000 Black voters from South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District — which includes parts of Charleston — to give Republicans an edge.
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The voters were moved into South Carolina’s 6th District. Ultimately, the court ruled that the map was unconstitutional, violating both the 14th and 15th Amendments.
Now, the Supreme Court — with a six to three conservative tilt — will hear the case, Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.
In recent years, Democrats have been more competitive in South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District. In the 2018 election, former House Representative Joe Cunningham won the seat in an upset, becoming the first Democrat to win the seat since 1978.
In 2020, Republican Nancy Mace won the seat back in a narrow victory. After Mace’s victory and the 2020 census, Republicans sought to redraw the district map to give it a Republican tilt. To do so, the court ruled that Republicans unlawfully removed voters based on their race from the district and said Republicans deliberately set a limit of 17% of voters in the district to be Black.
Mace won reelection in 2022, and the NAACP and other civil rights groups have since challenged the map.
“This case is about black voters resisting attempts to muzzle their political voice,” said Antonio L. Ingram II, assistant counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Gerrymandering is the manipulation of a set of electoral district boundaries to marginalize a particular group of voters while increasing the influence of another group. In this case, South Carolina Republicans are accused of racially gerrymandering, an effort the lower court referred to as “bleaching” the district.
However, South Carolina Republicans say race had nothing to do with the re-mapping, insisting they solely looked at voters’ political leanings.
“As members of the General Assembly and leaders of the General Assembly, we are defending our maps because we believe they were race-neutral and that they were within the confines of the laws that have been established by the United States Supreme Court,” said Speaker of the South Carolina House Rep. Murrell Smith, R-S.C.
The Supreme Court ruling could determine which party would win the congressional seat in 2024. If the lower court’s ruling is upheld, it could help Democrats cut into the thin majority Republicans have in the House. Both parties have requested the Supreme Court issue its ruling by Jan. 1, 2024 — the start of the election year.
Not all media outlets are covering this story across the political spectrum.
According to the Straight Arrow News Media Miss™ tool, this story is a Media Miss for the right. The Media Landscape indicates that while left-leaning outlets are covering this story, fewer right-leaning outlets are reporting on the Supreme Court’s case on the constitutionality of a Republican-drawn congressional district map.
Straight Arrow News strives to provide unbiased, fact-based news in addition to offering a comprehensive look at how the media is covering stories that matter most. Learn more about the Media Miss™ tool and decide for yourself.
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IS HEARING FROM SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICIALS WEDNESDAY AS THEY DEFEND A CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MAP DRAWN BY REPUBLICANS THAT WAS BLOCKED BY A PANEL OF THREE FEDERAL JUDGES WHO SAID THE STATE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY MOVED BLACK VOTERS FROM ONE DISTRICT TO ANOTHER.
IN THE RULING… THE PANEL SAID THAT SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICANS PURPOSELY MOVED THIRTY-THOUSAND*** BLACK VOTERS FROM SOUTH CAROLINA’S FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT – WHICH INCLUDES PARTS OF CHARLESTON – TO GIVE REPUBLICANS AN EDGE. THE VOTERS WERE MOVED INTO THE SIXTH DISTRICT. ULTIMATELY THE COURT RULED THAT THE MAP IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, SAYING IT VIOLATES BOTH THE 14TH AND 15TH AMENDMENT.
NOW THE SUPREME COURT, WITH A SIX TO THREE CONSERVATIVE TILT WILL HEAR THE CASE CALLED ALEXANDER V. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
THIS STORY IS NOT BEING COVERED BY ALL MEDIA…
THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MEDIA MISS TOOL SHOWS THE MAJORITY OF OUTLETS COVERING THE STORY ARE EITHER CENTER ORIENTED OR LEFT-LEANING
RIGHT-LEANING NEWS OUTLETS ARE UNDER-REPORTING THE SUPREME COURT WEIGHING IN ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE REPUBLICAN-DRAWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MAP. OUR REAL-TIME MEDIA MISS TOOL SPOTLIGHTS WHICH STORIES RIGHT-LEANING AND LEFT-LEANING OUTLETS AREN’T COVERING SO YOU GET A COMPLETE PICTURE OF THE NEWS. THIS IS HOW THE NEWS SHOULD BE… FAIR, FACTUAL AND UNBIASED.
IN RECENT YEARS DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN MORE COMPETITIVE IN SOUTH CAROLINA’S FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.. IN THE 2018 ELECTION JOE CUNNINGHAM WON THE SEAT IN AN UPSET BECOMING THE FIRST DEMOCRAT TO WIN THE SEAT SINCE 1978…
Former Congressman Joe Cunningham
“This campaign started at a small kitchen table in west Ashley, we did not have any staffers or money, and we didnt know a thing about running for office.”
IN 2020 REPUBLICAN NANCY MACE WON THE SEAT BACK IN A NARROW VICTORY… AFTER MACE’S VICTORY AND THE 2020 CENSUS… REPUBLICANS SOUGHT TO REDRAW THE DISTRICT MAP TO GIVE IT A REPUBLICAN TILT… TO DO SO THE COURT RULED THAT REPUBLICANS UNLAWFULLY REMOVED VOTERS BASED ON THEIR RACE FROM THE DISTRICT… AND SAID REPUBLICANS DELIBERATELY SET A LIMIT OF SEVENTEEN PERCENT OF VOTERS IN THE DISTRICT TO BE BLACK.
MACE WON REELECTION IN 2022… THE NAACP AND OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS HAVE SINCE CHALLENGED THE MAP…
Antonio L Ingram II – Assistant Counsel, NAACP Legal Defense Fund
“This case is about black voters resisting attempts to muzzle their political voice.”
THE MANIPULATION OF A SET OF ELECTORAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES TO MARGINALIZE A CERTAIN SET OF VOTERS WHILE INCREASING INFLUENCE OF ANOTHER SET IS CALLED GERRYMANDERING… AND IN THIS CASE BEING HEARD BY THE SUPREME COURT… SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICANS ARE ACCUSED OF RACIALLY GERRYMANDERING… AN EFFORT THE LOWER COURT REFERRED TO AS QUOTE “BLEACHING” THE DISTRICT.
BUT SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICANS SAY.. RACE** HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE RE-MAPPING… INSISTING THEY SOLELY LOOKED AT POLITICAL LEANINGS OF VOTERS…
State Rep. Murrell Smith (R) – Speaker of the S.C. State House
“As members of the general assembly and leaders of the general assembly we are defending our maps because we believe they were race neutral and that they were within the confines of the laws that have been established by the United States Supreme Court.”
THE SUPREME COURT RULING COULD DETERMINE WHICH PARTY WINS THE CONGRESSIONAL SEAT IN 2024… IF THE LOWER COURT’S RULING IS UPHELD… IT COULD HELP DEMOCRATS CUT INTO THE THIN MAJORITY REPUBLICANS HAVE IN THE HOUSE. BOTH PARTIES HAVE REQUESTED THE SUPREME COURT ISSUE ITS RULING BY JANUARY FIRST OF 2024.. THE START OF THE ELECTION YEAR.
Media Landscape
See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this dataBias Distribution
Left
New Racial Gerrymandering Case Before Supreme Court, Months After Last One Decided
Click to see story on HuffPostUS Supreme Court to hear racial gerrymandering case
Click to see story on Raw StorySupreme Court hears South Carolina case that may make it harder to challenge GOP racial gerrymanders
Click to see story on Daily KosArguments On South Carolina’s Maps Show How Thoroughly Supreme Court Broke Redistricting
Click to see story on Talking Points MemoSupreme court to review whether South Carolina map discriminated against Black voters
Click to see story on The GuardianThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on Associated Press NewsThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on abc NewsSupreme Court to consider South Carolina GOP’s ‘bleaching’ of Black voters out of Rep. Nancy Mace’s district
Click to see story on CNNSupreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering dispute
Click to see story on CBS NewsSouth Carolina redistricting case could add Democratic House seats
Click to see story on nprThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Star TribuneSupreme Court weighs South Carolina racial gerrymandering dispute
Click to see story on NBC NewsThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Coast ReporterThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Rocky Mountain OutlookSupreme Court likely to side with South Carolina GOP in racial gerrymandering case
Click to see story on PoliticoLISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears case about gerrymandering against Black voters in South Carolina
Click to see story on PBS NewsHourThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on NBC WashingtonIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on The HeraldSupreme Court signals support for Republican-leaning congressional district in SC – Maryland Daily Record
Click to see story on Maryland Daily RecordConservative justices suggest South Carolina GOP gerrymandering was based on politics, not race
Click to see story on KRDOThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KIFISupreme Court conservatives cast doubt on South Carolina racial gerrymander
Click to see story on The HillThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KVIANancy Mace’s seat under scrutiny in supreme court gerrymandering case
Click to see story on NewsweekThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Winnipeg Free PressThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on News 4 JAXThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WPLGSupreme Court of Canada session to hear arguments on secret trials, FN land dispute
Click to see story on The Globe & MailThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on WKMGThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Click on DetroitThe Supreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on The Post and CourierThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on San Diego Union TribuneThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Sask TodayThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WCBDThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on The ColumbianU.S. Supreme Court to take up SC redistricting case this week
Click to see story on WLTXIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on The StateSupreme Court to hear arguments on use of race in South Carolina congressional map
Click to see story on Roll CallU.S. Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on WBTWThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on KGETSCOTUS reviews whether S. Carolina targeted Black voters in gerrymandering case
Click to see story on Straight Arrow News10/9 NEWSBREAK: U.S. Supreme Court to hear S.C. redistricting case this week – Charleston City Paper
Click to see story on Charleston City PaperIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on myrtlebeachonline.comJustices signal support for a Republican-leaning S.C. district – Minnesota Lawyer
Click to see story on minnlawyer.comThe Supreme Court Signals Support For A Republican-leaning Congressional District In South Carolina
Click to see story on News18 IndiaSupreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Washington TimesThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on MY NorthwestRight
Untracked Bias
The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on My Mother LodeThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting
Click to see story on Airdrie City ViewS.C. Congressional redistricting map to be challenged in U.S. Supreme Court – ABC Columbia
Click to see story on ABC ColumbiaIs SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments
Click to see story on islandpacket.comSupreme Court signals support for a Republican-leaning congressional district in South Carolina
Click to see story on tnledger.comVOTE WITH THE UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACTS.™
We promise you context and clarity when it matters the most!
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Ex-college professor training people to physically resist election certification
Watch 2:0410 hrs ago -
Missouri officials sue to block DOJ from monitoring Election Day polling places
Watch 1:1010 hrs ago -
Idaho health department bans COVID-19 vaccinations in 6 counties
Watch 1:3212 hrs ago -
Netanyahu aide arrested, document leak could harm hostage negotiations
Watch 1:1514 hrs ago