Peter Zeihan

Geopolitical Strategist

Share
Commentary

What happens to China after Xi Jinping dies?

Share

Peter Zeihan

Geopolitical Strategist

Share

China is arguably the world’s second most powerful country, and its leader, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Xi Jinping, plays a major role in many of its economic and military decisions. So, with no heir apparent, what happens to China when Xi dies?

Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan answers this question and explains why China’s geography and political system make it so challenging to govern.


Be the first to know when Peter Zeihan publishes a new commentary! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!


Excerpted from Peter’s July 9 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

I get a lot of “what if…” and “what happens next…” style questions and most of them suck, but today’s question takes us down a fairly interesting rabbit hole — what happens to China if Chairman Xi Jinping dies or steps down?

Remember, I didn’t say that this rabbit hole was going to be a happy one, just that it was interesting. So instead of the headlines reading “China Flourishes Following the Death of Xi Jinping,” I would expect something more along the lines of “China Moves One Step Closer to Collapse.”

Between the gutted political system that Xi would leave in his wake and a faltering economy, China wouldn’t exactly be set up for success. The Chinese would likely have to scrap their current state structure and develop an entirely new system.

The bottom line is that Xi Jinping has caused plenty of problems during his time leading the country, but removing him from the picture isn’t going to magically solve those problems overnight.

Everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from Colorado’s last wilderness. This is last Canyon. A little bit of a bushwhack but it’s been a good day. Anyway, I’ve started my backpacking season. So we’re gonna be taking a lot of entries from the ask Peter files. I’ll try to do some current event ones, but you know, I’m not gonna be able to upload every day. So you know, it is what it is. Anyway, today’s entry is what happens to China when Asian Queen dies and like, you know, that’s a great question. A couple things to keep in mind. Number one, she has imprisoned and executed his way into being a cult of personality, there is no successor, there is no potential successor, there is no up and coming cadre of people with talent, he is basically purged the entire system of any with of ambition or competence. And so it is just him. And the bureaucracy now is going after things like patents and college dissertations so that no one who is under age 25 can even get into the system in the first place. So it is just gee, it is God alone, and he will ride this system into the ground.
It’s so much worse than that sounds because train is not a normal country. So there are different sorts of governing systems, confederal federal and unitary, confederal, your regions have more power than the center. So think Switzerland or Canada. In a federal system, there’s a shared competence among the national government, the regional government and the local governments think Germany, or maybe the United States. And then there are unitary systems where the national government basically sets all policy and everyone just has to go along with it. That’s Russia, that is France, that is Argentina. Tech, Nick Lee, China’s federal, but because of the purges, and because of the control of the Communist Party, it has basically become super unitary, where everything that happens in Beijing is the only thing that matters, because she has purged all of the regional and local governments of anyone who has any capacity. There’s an additional problem here.
And that’s just the geography of China itself. It is not an easy place to rule, you have a lot of very geographies that look to different parts of the world, much less different parts of the country took for leadership and economic growth. So for example, if you’re in the series of cities on the southern coast, roughly from Fujian to Guang Jo, you don’t have an interior, you don’t have access to local agricultural product, and you don’t have access to one another. What infrastructure exists in this area has been built just in the last 30 years. And I don’t mean to suggest it’s not impressive by any standards. It is. But it’s nothing like say being in the Midwest, or in northern Germany, where the land is flat, and infrastructure is easy. And so all these cities have their own individual identities, that historically speaking, all of them have gotten the majority of their calories going back 1500 years from somewhere, not on the Asian mainland. Then you got the center section, from Shanghai up to drinking. There we go.
The social one province, this is kind of the this is the area of Yangtze River. This is kind of the Mississippi of China. Think of it as Detroit, and Minneapolis and St. Louis and New Orleans and Houston all in one, definitely discrete economic unit with discrete political and cultural identity. And then you’ve got the north the North trying to play in around the Yellow River. This is an area that is pretty flat. And the problem is it’s just it’s been too big, historically speaking to be all under one power until the industrial era. And so you would generally have warlords trying to take over individual chunks of the territory. And because this is also a flood and drought prone area, the waterworks were necessary to maintain the population. So when a warlord thought he was going to lose or wanted to launch an attack on a neighbor, he’d go off to the waterworks. Anyway, so you get this nationalistic, militaristic north, you get kind of a corporatist industrialist financial center. And then what has traditionally been a secession is south. And keeping these all under the same rubric under the same governing system is hard. And so you have to basically look at Chinese history from this point of view, that there’s kind of two models. Model number one is each region has as much autonomy as it can stomach and the whole thing spins apart. And the North in particular falls into civil war was a reason why all of China’s dynasties never last very long. It’s hard to hold this all together, or you overcompensate the other direction and hyper concentrate authority in Beijing under the emperor or now under the communist party’s general secretary
and hold everything as tight as possible. Neither of them last for long. And unfortunately, there’s nothing in between that works really well either kind of a confederal system will just lead to friction and eventually conflict among the various sections. Well, at the moment, we are clearly having a hyper centralized system. So we have a hyper centralized system.
In a geography that is difficult to govern, but now everything’s been all the decisions being made in Beijing, we have a unitary system because the party is eliminated everyone who isn’t G.
And g himself is not a spring chicken. I mean, he’s not like Biden or Trump old. But the dude can’t be around for much longer, and there’s no one in the wings waiting to take over. So when this breaks, you take the most hyper centralized iteration of China we have ever had. And you cut off the head at a time when the country is facing financial overextension and a demographic collapse. So when GE dies, however, that happens, there will not be a another government of China, we will be facing state dissolution. And because the demographic situation is so bad, it’s entirely feasible, that we have a collapse in the country’s ability to generate any economic activity of note before such time as something can theoretically rise on the other side of this. So we could, we probably are looking at the end of the Han ethnicity as a player in international affairs, because by the time we get to the end of this century, there are going to be a lot of them left. So when g goes That’s it, the party’s over. All right. See you guys next ganyan

More from Peter Zeihan