California has undertaken the nation’s first and only state-level exploration of reparations for Black Americans to examine the effects of slavery and systemic racism. By July 1, a task force must finish the report and recommend to lawmakers how the state should repair any damage to Black Californians due to discriminatory policies.
But Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette argues that figuring out who should get what is “confusing,” and the numbers being talked about are so high that the reparations proposal will only end up hurting Democrats in 2024.
This task force is focused on specific areas of alleged harm: property seized by the state government, devaluation of Black businesses, housing discrimination, homelessness, health issues, mass incarceration, and “over-policing.” This will get confusing and maddening in a hurry.
For instance, if Black-owned businesses in California have in fact been devalued by state action, aren’t African Americans who own businesses owed greater compensation than individuals who don’t own a business? And if the grievance is homelessness, then shouldn’t any economic benefit go directly to Black homeless people in California, as opposed to African American millionaires who own McMansions? Lastly, how does a community measure “over-policing” that puts residents in danger when that same community has complained before about what it perceives to be “under-policing” that, wait, puts residents in danger?
Well, then there are the actual figures, some of which are — to borrow a phrase from Governor Sanders — “stone cold crazy.” Apart from the state legislature, San Francisco has its own plan to pay reparations to the city’s Black residents. Only about 5% of the population of San Francisco is Black. A draft plan from San Francisco’s reparation committee includes a proposed one-time lump sum payment of $5 million to each eligible individual. The draft argues that a “lump sum payment would compensate the affected population for the decades of harm that they experienced.” The figures bandied about by the state reparations committee seem paltry by comparison — only about $200,000 per resident — and about 6% of California’s population is Black.
Look, I’m not saying that African Americans in California don’t deserve compensation. In those cases where, for instance, a parcel of land was stolen from a family by the state through eminent domain, and then that parcel of land turned a profit for decades, and all the money went to state coffers — that’s not right. And California should make it right. But if the focus of reparations is too wide, the figures too high, and the grievance is too broad, you can expect Californians to push back by voting out Democrats and voting in Republicans.
This state could be hit by a red wave in the presidential election of 2024 — and the governor’s race in 2026 — all because of reparations. When this all shakes out, some Black Californians may get a reparations check — good for them — but the rest of the state will wind up paying the price — and for decades to come.
issues ranging from tax reform to illegal immigration to gun control. California often leads the way. This ain’t Las Vegas. What happens in the Golden State rarely stays in the Golden State. This is where national trends start before they head east. Unfortunately, California’s tendency to lead the way might also include leading the way to lunacy. The nation’s most populous state is the new capital of wokeness. Oh, great. In her official response to President Biden State of the Union address, Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders observed quote, the dividing line in America is no longer between right or left the choices between normal or crazy. Well, the example of how California a state that never sanctioned slavery is handling the reparations issue falls into the latter category. On July 1 2023, a first in the nation Task Force on paying reparations to African Americans is supposed to file its final report to the state legislature. The origin story tracks back to the savage murder of George Floyd in May 2020. By Derek Chauvin, a now former Minneapolis Police Officer, after riots erupted in dozens of US cities, California lawmakers were rattled, rattled enough to pass a reparations bill that was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2020. The bill create a task force to study reparations, hear from experts and suggest ways that the state could atone for its sins against black Californians. In January. The members of the taskforce seem to agree that there should be a residency requirement. If you want a check from the state of California, you must live in California. That’s fair. But it’s also fair that African Americans who lived in California for multiple generations are more deserving of reparations than recent arrivals from Tennessee or Georgia or New York. This taskforce is focused on specific areas of alleged harm property seized by the state government, devaluation of black businesses, housing discrimination, homelessness, health issues, mass incarceration, and quote over policing, this will get confusing and maddening in a hurry. For instance, if black owned businesses in California have in fact been devalued by state action, aren’t African Americans who own businesses owed greater compensation than individuals who don’t own a business? And if the grievance is homelessness, then shouldn’t any economic benefit go directly to black homeless people in California, as opposed to African American millionaires who own McMansions? Lastly, how does a community measure quote over policing that puts residents in danger when that same community has complained before about what it perceives to be under policing that wait puts residents in danger? Well, then there are the actual figures, some of which aren’t a borrow a phrase from Governor Sanders Stone Cold crazy. Apart from the state legislature, San Francisco has its own plan to pay reparations to the city’s black residents. Only about 5% of the population of San Francisco is black. A draft plan from San Francisco’s reparation committee includes a proposed one time lump sum payment of $5 million dollars to each eligible individual. The draft argues that a quote, lump sum payment would compensate the affected population for the decades of harm that they experienced. The figures bandied about by the state reparations committee seem paltry by comparison, only about $200,000 per resident, and about 6% of California’s population is black. Look, I’m not saying that African Americans and California don’t deserve compensation. In those cases where for instance, a parcel of land was stolen from a family by the state through eminent domain, and then that parcel land turned a profit for decades, and all the money went to state coffers. That’s not right. And California should make it right. But if the focus of reparations is too wide, the figures too high, and the grievance is too broad. You can expect Californians to push back by voting out Democrats and voting in Republicans. This state could be hit by a red wave in the presidential election of 2024. And the governor’s race in 2026. All because of reparations. When this all shakes out, some black Californians may get a reparations check good for them, but the rest of the state will wind up paying the price. And for decades to come.
Ruben Navarrette
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Ruben
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
California reparations proposal may hurt Democrats in 2024
Feb 28
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
California has undertaken the nation’s first and only state-level exploration of reparations for Black Americans to examine the effects of slavery and systemic racism. By July 1, a task force must finish the report and recommend to lawmakers how the state should repair any damage to Black Californians due to discriminatory policies.
But Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette argues that figuring out who should get what is “confusing,” and the numbers being talked about are so high that the reparations proposal will only end up hurting Democrats in 2024.
issues ranging from tax reform to illegal immigration to gun control. California often leads the way. This ain’t Las Vegas. What happens in the Golden State rarely stays in the Golden State. This is where national trends start before they head east. Unfortunately, California’s tendency to lead the way might also include leading the way to lunacy. The nation’s most populous state is the new capital of wokeness. Oh, great. In her official response to President Biden State of the Union address, Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders observed quote, the dividing line in America is no longer between right or left the choices between normal or crazy. Well, the example of how California a state that never sanctioned slavery is handling the reparations issue falls into the latter category. On July 1 2023, a first in the nation Task Force on paying reparations to African Americans is supposed to file its final report to the state legislature. The origin story tracks back to the savage murder of George Floyd in May 2020. By Derek Chauvin, a now former Minneapolis Police Officer, after riots erupted in dozens of US cities, California lawmakers were rattled, rattled enough to pass a reparations bill that was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2020. The bill create a task force to study reparations, hear from experts and suggest ways that the state could atone for its sins against black Californians. In January. The members of the taskforce seem to agree that there should be a residency requirement. If you want a check from the state of California, you must live in California. That’s fair. But it’s also fair that African Americans who lived in California for multiple generations are more deserving of reparations than recent arrivals from Tennessee or Georgia or New York. This taskforce is focused on specific areas of alleged harm property seized by the state government, devaluation of black businesses, housing discrimination, homelessness, health issues, mass incarceration, and quote over policing, this will get confusing and maddening in a hurry. For instance, if black owned businesses in California have in fact been devalued by state action, aren’t African Americans who own businesses owed greater compensation than individuals who don’t own a business? And if the grievance is homelessness, then shouldn’t any economic benefit go directly to black homeless people in California, as opposed to African American millionaires who own McMansions? Lastly, how does a community measure quote over policing that puts residents in danger when that same community has complained before about what it perceives to be under policing that wait puts residents in danger? Well, then there are the actual figures, some of which aren’t a borrow a phrase from Governor Sanders Stone Cold crazy. Apart from the state legislature, San Francisco has its own plan to pay reparations to the city’s black residents. Only about 5% of the population of San Francisco is black. A draft plan from San Francisco’s reparation committee includes a proposed one time lump sum payment of $5 million dollars to each eligible individual. The draft argues that a quote, lump sum payment would compensate the affected population for the decades of harm that they experienced. The figures bandied about by the state reparations committee seem paltry by comparison, only about $200,000 per resident, and about 6% of California’s population is black. Look, I’m not saying that African Americans and California don’t deserve compensation. In those cases where for instance, a parcel of land was stolen from a family by the state through eminent domain, and then that parcel land turned a profit for decades, and all the money went to state coffers. That’s not right. And California should make it right. But if the focus of reparations is too wide, the figures too high, and the grievance is too broad. You can expect Californians to push back by voting out Democrats and voting in Republicans. This state could be hit by a red wave in the presidential election of 2024. And the governor’s race in 2026. All because of reparations. When this all shakes out, some black Californians may get a reparations check good for them, but the rest of the state will wind up paying the price. And for decades to come.
If Biden bows out, Gavin Newsom might be best replacement
As the 2024 presidential election nears, concerns about President Joe Biden’s age and Vice President Kamala Harris’ readiness to step in are emerging. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a successful Democrat, is reassuring voters that Biden can win again. Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette argues that if Biden bows out of the race, Newsom, with
Tuesday
Why the lackluster response to affirmative action ruling?
The United States Supreme Court recently struck down affirmative action in admissions processes for U.S. colleges and universities. It was the biggest defeat for affirmative action advocates in recent history. Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette remarks on the unimpressive public response to such a historic defeat and explores some of the reasons why the
Sep 12
Did DeSantis’s policies contribute to racist Jacksonville killings?
In the aftermath of the racist shootings in Tallahassee, Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) faced a chorus of boos as he attempted to speak at a vigil honoring the victims. Despite asserting his party’s stance against racist violence in the state, some critics point to DeSantis’s policies, which oppose “wokeness” and alter the way Black
Sep 5
Here’s why Biden doesn’t get credit for his accomplishments
President Joe Biden’s White House has highlighted several achievements in service to the American people, like reducing their expenses, altering the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic and revitalizing U.S. infrastructure. Despite these accomplishments, recent polls show a majority of Americans seem to be placing greater emphasis on other intangibles, such as President Biden’s age. Straight Arrow News
Aug 29
Ramaswamy is tone deaf when talking about race
Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy trails former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in the polls. Ramaswamy’s platform, which includes tightening security along the southern border and endorsing conservative family values, seems to be resonating with GOP voters. Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette highlights what he sees as an Achilles’ heel,
Aug 22
Stories each side is underreporting
Border apprehensions up nearly 27 percent from July to August
11 sources | 0% from the left
Six young activists devote years to climate fight with 32 governments. Now comes their day in court
13 sources | 9% from the right
Latest Opinions
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
19 hrs ago
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Yesterday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Yesterday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Yesterday
Government Accountability Office
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
Watch 2:12
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Yesterday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Yesterday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Yesterday
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
US Air Force needs to ‘reoptimize’ or it could lose to China
AP Images
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook