President Joe Biden recently signed into law a bipartisan gun bill that fortifies background checks on gun buyers under 21, provides billions for mental health services, and closes a loophole to prevent convicted domestic abusers from purchasing a firearm for five years. It is the nation’s first major gun deal in 30 years, and while Republicans will not concede on tougher gun sales limits, Democrats face immense pressure to get something done. It’s personal for Straight Arrow News contributor Michael J. Stern, who argues that an assault weapons and large capacity magazine ban must be passed if we want to reduce mass shootings:
When I was a young prosecutor preparing for my first murder trial, a detective handed me a photo of a new father who was shot in the head by a robber who broke into his home. Before that, I’d seen TV coverage of countless shootings. But I will never forget the horror of that close-up view. It sent me running to the bathroom, where I vomited my lunch. That image forever calibrated the strength of my support for laws that restrict easy access to guns.
Victims of gun violence do not silently disappear — they explode. And the sooner Americans are forced to confront the brutal reality of what comes with indiscriminate access to weapons of war, the sooner they will hand their GOP employees in Congress a warning that says, “If you don’t protect me from seeing this again, you’re fired.”
I’m not suggesting flooding news and social media with endless pictures of gun victims. Sadly, exposure to any terror can be tolerated if we see enough of it. I’m suggesting that there will be a brave family who wants to share the story, and video, of their happy child before…and the unsanitized photographs of their child after being obliterated by a weapon Republican members of Congress call their right.
It is true that even if consequential gun limits are made the law of the land, the Supreme Court could find them unconstitutional. While Democrats hold the presidency and both houses of Congress, they should expand the Court and dilute the 6-3 conservative majority that was secured by the Congressional equivalent of thievery. But that’s a discussion for another day.
Finally, to the Second Amendment commandos who are sweating at the prospect that the stack of bullet-riddled bodies is at long last tall enough to bring reasonable gun safety laws…you have my thoughts and prayers.
I’m a true-blue Democrat. I believe in gun control. But I cringe at the failure of Democrats to focus on a single campaign that maximizes our chances of making it happen. When I hear members of my own party drone on about how we should have a nationwide gun ban, because the Second Amendment was only intended to provide for a “well-regulated militia,” I end up saying nasty things to my TV and computer. I agree with that argument, but people more important than me, namely a majority of the Supreme Court, do not.
In 2008, in a case called District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court said that the Second Amendment gives individuals a right to maintain a handgun in their home for self-defense. In a legal contest between the Supreme Court and anyone else, the Court is going to win. So, the words “well-regulated militia” should not be uttered from Democrats from here on out, if they want to maintain any credibility in this fight.
That’s not to say that things are hopeless. While Democrats have lost the larger battle, there are victories that can be won at the edges. Some of the wins could have a substantial impact on mass shootings like the recent elementary school massacre in Uvalde, Texas and the grocery store murders in Buffalo, New York.
While several lower courts have considered whether the Second Amendment provides a right to possess assault weapons, like the semi-automatic AR-15 used to murder 19 children and two adults in Uvalde, the Supreme Court has not ruled on the issue. The Court has also not ruled on the issue of whether high-capacity magazines are protected by the Second Amendment. Even deceased Supreme Court Justice Anton Scalia, who wrote the Heller opinion, acknowledged that the Second Amendment is not without limits.Democrats should celebrate the recently passed federal law that beefs-up expanded background checks, and limits domestic abusers and people under red flag orders from getting a gun. But it is assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that turn a shooting into a slaughter. Passing federal legislation banning both is where Democrats should be focusing their resources. It’s not like a ban on assault weapons is unheard of. There was a federal ban for a decade – between 1994 and 2004 – before Republicans refused to extend it when it expired.
So, how do we do it? We stop calling for a full ban on personal possession of firearms and coalesce around a theme like “common sense gun safety laws.” We continue to point out the evidence that: banning assault weapons reduces gun deaths; a strong majority of Americans support an assault weapon ban; and the Republicans who oppose common sense gun limits are largely funded by the gun lobby. The problem is that none of that has worked so far.
It’s time we stop coddling American sensibilities about what is acceptable to show on TV and online news after a mass shooting. It’s one thing to read about the damage done. It’s quite another to see what happens when a speeding piece of metal rips through a child’s flesh, and blood, and bone.
When I was a young prosecutor preparing for my first murder trial, a detective handed me a photo of a new father who was shot in the head by a robber who broke into his home. Before that, I’d seen TV coverage of countless shootings. But I will never forget the horror of that close-up view. It sent me running to the bathroom, where I vomited my lunch. That image forever calibrated the strength of my support for laws that restrict easy access to guns.
Victims of gun violence do not silently disappear. They explode. And the sooner Americans are forced to confront the brutal reality of what comes with indiscriminate access to weapons of war, the sooner they will hand their GOP employees in Congress a warning that says, “if you don’t protect me from seeing this again, you’re fired.”
I’m not suggesting flooding news and social media with endless pictures of gun victims. Sadly, exposure to any terror can be tolerated if we see enough of it. I’m suggesting that there will be a brave family who wants to share the story, and video, of their happy child before…and the unsanitized photographs of their child after being obliterated by a weapon Republican members of Congress call their right.
It is true that even if consequential gun limits are made the law of the land, the Supreme Court could find them unconstitutional. While Democrats hold the presidency and both houses of Congress, they should expand the Court and dilute the 6-3 conservative majority that was secured by the Congressional equivalent of thievery. But that’s a discussion for another day.
Finally, to the Second Amendment commandos who are sweating at the prospect that the stack of bullet-riddled bodies is at long last tall enough to bring reasonable gun safety laws…you have my thoughts and prayers.
Michael J. Stern
Former federal prosecutor
View Video LibraryShare
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Argentina President-elect Javier Milei is no Donald Trump
10 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Why I’m done with Twitter (X) … and Elon Musk
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
‘It’s their land’: Americans debate Gaza, Israel and Hamas
Yesterday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Small nuclear reactors are not the future of energy
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Democrats need a better plan for gun control
Jul 27, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By Straight Arrow News
President Joe Biden recently signed into law a bipartisan gun bill that fortifies background checks on gun buyers under 21, provides billions for mental health services, and closes a loophole to prevent convicted domestic abusers from purchasing a firearm for five years. It is the nation’s first major gun deal in 30 years, and while Republicans will not concede on tougher gun sales limits, Democrats face immense pressure to get something done. It’s personal for Straight Arrow News contributor Michael J. Stern, who argues that an assault weapons and large capacity magazine ban must be passed if we want to reduce mass shootings:
I’m a true-blue Democrat. I believe in gun control. But I cringe at the failure of Democrats to focus on a single campaign that maximizes our chances of making it happen. When I hear members of my own party drone on about how we should have a nationwide gun ban, because the Second Amendment was only intended to provide for a “well-regulated militia,” I end up saying nasty things to my TV and computer. I agree with that argument, but people more important than me, namely a majority of the Supreme Court, do not.
In 2008, in a case called District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court said that the Second Amendment gives individuals a right to maintain a handgun in their home for self-defense. In a legal contest between the Supreme Court and anyone else, the Court is going to win. So, the words “well-regulated militia” should not be uttered from Democrats from here on out, if they want to maintain any credibility in this fight.
That’s not to say that things are hopeless. While Democrats have lost the larger battle, there are victories that can be won at the edges. Some of the wins could have a substantial impact on mass shootings like the recent elementary school massacre in Uvalde, Texas and the grocery store murders in Buffalo, New York.
While several lower courts have considered whether the Second Amendment provides a right to possess assault weapons, like the semi-automatic AR-15 used to murder 19 children and two adults in Uvalde, the Supreme Court has not ruled on the issue. The Court has also not ruled on the issue of whether high-capacity magazines are protected by the Second Amendment. Even deceased Supreme Court Justice Anton Scalia, who wrote the Heller opinion, acknowledged that the Second Amendment is not without limits.Democrats should celebrate the recently passed federal law that beefs-up expanded background checks, and limits domestic abusers and people under red flag orders from getting a gun. But it is assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that turn a shooting into a slaughter. Passing federal legislation banning both is where Democrats should be focusing their resources. It’s not like a ban on assault weapons is unheard of. There was a federal ban for a decade – between 1994 and 2004 – before Republicans refused to extend it when it expired.
So, how do we do it? We stop calling for a full ban on personal possession of firearms and coalesce around a theme like “common sense gun safety laws.” We continue to point out the evidence that: banning assault weapons reduces gun deaths; a strong majority of Americans support an assault weapon ban; and the Republicans who oppose common sense gun limits are largely funded by the gun lobby. The problem is that none of that has worked so far.
It’s time we stop coddling American sensibilities about what is acceptable to show on TV and online news after a mass shooting. It’s one thing to read about the damage done. It’s quite another to see what happens when a speeding piece of metal rips through a child’s flesh, and blood, and bone.
When I was a young prosecutor preparing for my first murder trial, a detective handed me a photo of a new father who was shot in the head by a robber who broke into his home. Before that, I’d seen TV coverage of countless shootings. But I will never forget the horror of that close-up view. It sent me running to the bathroom, where I vomited my lunch. That image forever calibrated the strength of my support for laws that restrict easy access to guns.
Victims of gun violence do not silently disappear. They explode. And the sooner Americans are forced to confront the brutal reality of what comes with indiscriminate access to weapons of war, the sooner they will hand their GOP employees in Congress a warning that says, “if you don’t protect me from seeing this again, you’re fired.”
I’m not suggesting flooding news and social media with endless pictures of gun victims. Sadly, exposure to any terror can be tolerated if we see enough of it. I’m suggesting that there will be a brave family who wants to share the story, and video, of their happy child before…and the unsanitized photographs of their child after being obliterated by a weapon Republican members of Congress call their right.
It is true that even if consequential gun limits are made the law of the land, the Supreme Court could find them unconstitutional. While Democrats hold the presidency and both houses of Congress, they should expand the Court and dilute the 6-3 conservative majority that was secured by the Congressional equivalent of thievery. But that’s a discussion for another day.
Finally, to the Second Amendment commandos who are sweating at the prospect that the stack of bullet-riddled bodies is at long last tall enough to bring reasonable gun safety laws…you have my thoughts and prayers.
Democrats need a better plan for gun control
President Joe Biden recently signed into law a bipartisan gun bill that fortifies background checks on gun buyers under 21, provides billions for mental health services, and closes a loophole to prevent convicted domestic abusers from purchasing a firearm for five years. It is the nation’s first major gun deal in 30 years, and while
Jul 27
Media Miss
Stories each side is underreporting
Anti-Abortion Medical Groups Sue to Stop Washington Inquiry
6 sources | 0% from the left
AP Images
Georgia Republicans advance House and Senate maps as congressional proposal waits in the wings
20 sources | 6% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Opinions
Reuters
SpaceX launches S. Korean spy satellite days after North’s launch
Watch 1:18
3 hrs ago
Axios
Ex-Google CEO warns of AI threats to humanity within 5-10 years
Watch 1:28
4 hrs ago
AP Images
New York City officials consider first US congestion pricing program
Watch 1:54
5 hrs ago
Reuters
Filipino coast guard builds station in contested South China Sea
Watch 1:49
6 hrs ago
Getty Images
Texas sues Pfizer, says company lied about efficacy of COVID vaccine
Watch 1:53
7 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Biden losing support of Black Americans, identity politics is to blame
6 hrs ago
Star Parker
Trump’s push to prosecute Capitol Police reveals anti-democracy stance
7 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Viral Big Mac video is misleading as inflation cools
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
To address poverty, tax the rich and vote blue
Wednesday
Adrienne Lawrence
Politics
Sen. Rand Paul performs Heimlich maneuver on choking colleague
13 hrs ago
Tommy Tuberville says military holds could be resolved in about a week
Henry Kissinger dies at 100: The Morning Rundown, Nov. 30, 2023
Getty Images
U.S.
SpaceX launches S. Korean spy satellite days after North’s launch
3 hrs ago
Texas sues Pfizer, says company lied about efficacy of COVID vaccine
Dave Chappelle asked to write George Santos joke, here’s his response
Reuters
International
Filipino coast guard builds station in contested South China Sea
6 hrs ago
Airstrikes resume in Gaza as cease-fire ends: The Morning Rundown, Dec. 1, 2023
Anti-immigration signs spark hate crime probes in Northern Ireland
Reuters
Tech
Ex-Google CEO warns of AI threats to humanity within 5-10 years
4 hrs ago
Judge blocks Montana TikTok ban from taking effect Jan. 1
It’s ChatGPT’s birthday. Here’s how it changed the AI game in 1 short year.
Axios