Skip to main content
U.S.

Uber wins case based on terms and conditions agreement over 2022 crash

Share

In what may serve as another reminder to read the fine print, a court blocked a New Jersey couple from suing Uber after a crash left them with broken bones and hefty medical bills. The cases dismissal reported by several outlets on Wednesday, Oct. 2, is because the couple accepted the terms and conditions from the rideshare app before taking the ride, which requires any complaint to be handled outside of court.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 32% Center 58% Right 11%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The pair tried to take Uber to court for a jury trial after their Uber driver ran a red light and got hit by another car in 2022, but an appeals court judge sided with the rideshare giant instead.

The couple contended that it was their underaged daughter who clicked the most recent agreement with Uber Eats in 2022 while ordering a pizza. For that reason, the couple believes the case should move forward.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

However, Uber argued back that it wasn’t their daughter who signed agreements in 2015 and 2021, both of which waived the couple’s right to a court trial with arbitration clauses. It also didn’t reportedly help the couple’s case that they couldn’t “surmise” whether or not their daughter actually clicked the button to agree to the terms.

The husband reacted to the judge’s ruling by saying that they are “heartbroken,” but said that they expect to attempt to bring their case to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

The lawsuit that was tossed by the appellate demanded that Uber pay for physical, emotional and financial damages the crash caused the couple.

It’s not the first time that this has happened, in fact, it happened earlier this year. In August, Disney used a similar defense, but later reversed course, on a dispute over terms of service in a wrongful death suit.

The case was brought against the entertainment company by a man whose wife died after an allergic reaction at a Disney resort restaurant.

Disney tried to have the lawsuit tossed because the plaintiff signed up for a Disney+ trial years earlier. However, after backlash, Disney said that the case can now move forward in court.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

[KARAH RUCKER]

ANOTHER REMINDER TO READ THE FINE PRINT…

A COURT IS BLOCKING A NEW JERSEY COUPLE FROM SUING UBER AFTER A BAD CRASH LEFT THEM WITH BROKEN BONES AND HEFTY MEDICAL BILLS.

WHY? 

BECAUSE THEY ACCEPTED THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS BEFORE TAKING THE RIDE, WHICH REQUIRES ANY COMPLAINT TO BE HANDLED OUTSIDE OF COURT.

THE PAIR TRIED TO TAKE UBER TO COURT FOR A JURY TRIAL AFTER THEIR UBER DRIVER RAN A RED LIGHT AND GOT PLOWED INTO BY ANOTHER CAR IN 2022.

BUT THE APPEALS COURT SIDED WITH THE RIDESHARE GIANT.

THE COUPLE CONTENDED IT WAS THEIR UNDERAGED DAUGHTER WHO CLICKED THE MOST RECENT AGREEMENT WITH UBER EATS IN 2022 WHILE ORDERING A PIZZA– SO, THE CASE SHOULD MOVE FORWARD.

UBER FOUGHT BACK ARGUING IT WASN’T THEIR DAUGHTER WHO SIGNED AGREEMENTS IN 2015 AND 2021… BOTH OF WHICH WAIVED THE COUPLE’S RIGHT TO A COURT TRIAL WITH ARBITRATION CLAUSES.

IT DIDN’T HELP THE COUPLE’S CASE DURING THEIR COURT APPEARANCE WHEN THEY COULDN’T “SURMISE” WHETHER OR NOT THEIR DAUGHTER ACTUALLY CLICKED THE BUTTON.

THE HUSBAND AND WIFE NOW SAY THEY’RE “HEARTBROKEN” … 

AND WILL TRY TO BRING THEIR CASE TO THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.

THE LAWSUIT DEMANDED UBER PAY FOR PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL AND FINANCIAL DAMAGES THE CRASH CAUSED THEM.

IT’S PROBABLY NOT THE FIRST TIME YOU’VE HEARD OF THIS HAPPENING.

IN AUGUST, DISNEY USED A SIMILAR DEFENSE BUT REVERSED COURSE ON A DISPUTE OVER TERMS OF SERVICE IN A WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT.

THE CASE WAS BROUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY BY A MAN WHOSE WIFE DIED AFTER AN ALLERGIC REACTION AT A DISNEY RESORT RESTAURANT.

DISNEY TRIED TO GET THE LAWSUIT TOSSED BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFF SIGNED UP FOR A DISNEY-PLUS TRIAL YEARS EARLIER.

AFTER BACKLASH, DISNEY SAID THE CASE COULD MOVE FORWARD IN COURT.

FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KARAH RUCKER.