Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
The financial collapse of 2008, while perhaps far from most Americans’ minds today, was considered then the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.
Yet unfortunately, it was that collapse that swept into power a government like the one we now have where the White House and both houses of Congress are controlled by Democrats.
Back then, newly elected President Barack Obama appointed then Representative Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. And Rahm Emanuel was known for making the statement, making the popular statement: Never let a serious crisis go to waste.
Very popular at that time because they never let a serious crisis go to waste. At one of those crises this New Democrat administration followed, their advice was the financial collapse. They used the financial crisis as an opportunity for a major expansion of government.
In 2008, Democrats wasted no time to ascribe the financial collapse to business greed and insufficient regulation of banks and other financial institutions, at least that’s what they said.
By 2010, the 2300 page Dodd-Frank Act was passed with no Republican votes in the House and only three in the Senate.
It added 400 new regulations on financial institutions included in the tsunami of these new financial regulations was the creation of a new independent agency, the Consumer Protection Financial Bureau.
This agency originally the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren, was conceived with her view shared by most Democrats on the far left, that any disparities in financial results between black and white Americans must be due to racism and discrimination.
As always, in the view of progressives to fix any and every problem is that an all powerful bureaucrat somewhere here in Washington, DC is needed to level the playing field.
Thus from the passage of Dodd-Frank till today, our financial institutions, banks, securities firms, credit unions, payday loans, etc., etc. all fall under the purview of this Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which we can call the CFPB, and they must submit to its scrutiny and its oversight and now never let a crisis go to waste.
Those philosophers of “we don’t let any serious crisis go to waste” are back in power and the CFPB, has just announced sweeping new changes, sweeping new changes in what they call in quotes.
“Supervisory operations to better protect families and communities from illegal discrimination.” So now firms that are under the purview of this CFPB, they must make available to the agency. They’re in quotes, again, “processes for assessing risk and discriminatory outcomes, including documentation of consumer demographics and the impact of products and fees on different demographic groups.”
We might summarize this as financial market oversight gone woke totally woke because we have to ask ourselves, can a government bureaucrat really determine why a banker did or did not make a loan?
And we have to ask ourselves, should the heavy hand of government be involved here at all?
Maybe we should remind ourselves of some of the realities from the financial crisis of 2008.
According to the work of American Enterprise Institute, Peter Wallison, the crisis was not the result of insufficient regulation of businesses, but government excess. It was too much government.
Wallison identified government mandated affordable housing goals in 1992 as part of the problem that we experienced in 2008.
Those 1992 mandates that the two giant government-backed mortgage companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that they had to set a quota of 30% of all mortgages that they acquired from mortgage originators to be targeted to low and moderate income borrowers.
And they began then to lax the processes: the rules over lending. By 2008 these quotas were up to 56% and in order to meet the quotas, lending practices were dramatically relaxed: down payment requirements dropped from 10% to 3%. Credit scores didn’t even matter. In fact, it really didn’t matter, the worse your score. It seems like the more money you got.
And so the debt to income requirements for borrowers were also relaxed.
And with the collapse of lending standards, housing demand and prices went through the roof.
And then the bubble exploded. But who suffered the most? Well, we know. And per Pew Research, they had a headline. Blacks and Hispanics have borne the disproportionate share of both job losses and housing foreclosures.
During that time, the low income Americans that government keeps saying that they want to help the most are the ones that keep getting hurt the most. When people keep thinking that the answer is to expand government. And now today, Democrats are back at it.
The new CFPB director is gearing up to use his almost unilateral power to show he knows better than business. He knows better than the marketplace. He knows what’s good for consumers. So surely, once again, those who will suffer the most will be those that are struggling, those that are low income citizens. Those that need access to capital most.
Well, that’s who will suffer unless, of course, Republicans win the House and the Senate in November. And they stop these insidious new rules from ever being enacted.
-
House Speaker Johnson’s foreign aid bill shows a focused GOP
Following months of deliberation regarding U.S. assistance to its allies, the Senate approved a $95 billion aid package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson spearheaded the approval of this wartime funding amidst renewed calls from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., for him to resign. Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker asserts…
-
Biden using taxpayer dollars to buy voters is indefensible
In July 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned President Biden’s attempt to cancel more than $400 billion in student debt. Biden has since been exploring ways to bypass the ruling. Recently, he announced that over 270,000 individuals enrolled in his income-driven repayment plan (SAVE) will have $7.4 billion in debt canceled. This action brings the…
-
Trump should move ahead with federal abortion bans
Decades-long Republican efforts to roll back abortion access are now paying off in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court ruling which overturned Roe v. Wade. And yet today, an overwhelming majority of Americans say that they believe at least some abortion access should be protected. GOP presidential candidate Donald…
-
Biden’s White House shows hostility toward Christianity on Easter
President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden recently hosted an education-themed Easter egg roll at the White House, while also acknowledging International Transgender Day of Visibility. Some Republicans criticized the White House for banning religious themes from designs in the children’s egg decorating contest. Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker argues that the White House…
-
Kamala Harris’s abortion clinic visit endorses crime against humanity
Kamala Harris became the first American vice president in history to visit an abortion services provider while in office on Thursday, Mar. 14. That visit was a part of her “Fight for Reproductive Freedoms” tour, which she hopes will mobilize Americans concerned about dwindling access to reproductive healthcare and abortion services. Straight Arrow News contributor…
Latest Opinions
-
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
-
Powering pot: Energy for US cannabis industry could electrify 13.5M homes
-
Allies plan for Trump to have more control over interest rates
-
FDA: Bird flu found in 1/5 commercial milk samples, suggests greater spread
-
China permanently deploys warships to second overseas base
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.