Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Alec Baldwin seems to have banked an early win in his involuntary manslaughter case. But this win is not indicative of the strength of his case as much as it reflects in justices built into the system that apparently, even a wealthy white actor couldn’t escape. Yeah, so many of us were all shocked at the close of January, beginning of February, when New Mexico prosecutors first charged Baldwin for that on-set fatal shooting of cinematographer Halina Hutchins back in October of 2021. Now that shock wasn’t so much because Baldwin was actually charged. And he was charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, because well, he was the producer on the film. And also he was the one that fired the gun that killed Hutchins. Well, what seemed to really shock me was that prosecutors added a firearm enhancement on to the charge, carrying a mandatory five-year prison sentence.
Now, that five years otherwise would have hovered around 18 months. Now that enhancement on one of the charges seemed pretty extra, and it clearly was definitely extra. That would explain why prosecutors pulled that enhancement earlier this week. As Baldwin’s attorneys argued in court, the prosecutors should not have brought charges under that enhancement statute, because it didn’t even exist until January of 2022. Yeah, that was months after the shooting. So said another way, the enhancement wasn’t the law when Baldwin killed Hutchins, and also that enhancement, it was not retroactive, either. So basically, the prosecutors tried to apply a law to Baldwin despite knowing good and well that it did not and could not apply to him. That is shady.
And of course the prosecutor’s office wouldn’t admit that they were trumping up charges on Baldwin, instead claiming that the enhancement charge was being dropped to avoid further litigious distractions by Baldwin and his attorneys, adding that the prosecution’s priority is securing justice, not securing billable hours for big city attorneys. Now I am no fan of Alec Baldwin and I do find it loathsome that he’s moving forward with filming “Rust.” Even so, I am a fan of justice. How often do prosecutors unnecessarily tack on charges to scare defendants?
Overcharging is a well-known tactic used by prosecutors to leverage a plea bargain, or let’s call it what it is, to coerce a guilty plea. Throwing charges against a wall and seeing what sticks is an abuse of power that can really harm defendants, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. You know, people who don’t have the resources to pay big-city attorneys to fight back, but are forced to rely on the already-strained public defender’s office.
Overcharging only furthers mass incarceration, funneling more marginalized people into a system that hurts communities and hurts the innocent. Prosecutors are supposed to be the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system. When gatekeepers abuse their power, there can be no justice. Now fortunately for Baldwin, it’s more likely that justice will be done in his case, because he has the economic means to hire the best legal counsel who will advocate on his behalf and challenge ridiculous charges like this sentencing enhancement. But not everybody has those means. Actually, most of us don’t. We’re either relying on prosecutors to be ethical in their charging decisions, to not abuse the power that they have, not to make a statement or to garner media attention.
Those New Mexico prosecutors, they know that the world is watching so why they would use this moment as an opportunity to sow further doubt in the criminal legal system is truly beyond me. But one thing I do know however, is that every defendant deserves better…even the wealthy white ones who can afford to fight back.
-
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
-
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
-
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
-
Gen Z women must fight for their rights
Gen Z, the first “digital native” U.S. generation, is entering the workforce, studying at university and serving in the military. From school shootings and cyber-bullying to COVID-19 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this generation has been shaped by unique trends and events, and how they will behave as citizens and voters is an…
-
Users must have rights in Big Tech’s AI race
Big Tech companies across the board, including Meta, X, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are racing to draft policies that enable them to use user-generated content to train advanced generative AI models without user permission or compensation. The Federal Trade Commission is investigating where it can, but government regulations lag far behind the rapid pace of…
Latest Opinions
-
Israel believes ICC is ready to issue arrest warrants over Hamas war
-
Deep sea mining may end US reliance on China, enviro concerns remain
-
Beijing auto show features next-gen EVs unavailable to US consumers
-
USDA assures public retail meat is safe, still plans to test beef samples
-
Study: Bottlenose dolphin tested positive for bird flu off Florida coast
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.