
8 US inspectors general fired last month suing Trump administration
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Bast Bramhall (Video Editor)
- Eight U.S. inspectors general fired last month by President Donald Trump are suing the administration to get their jobs back. The lawsuit announced on Wednesday accuses Trump of breaking the law by failing to give U.S. Congress 30-days’ notice and a valid explanation for their terminations.
- The lawsuit cites a 2022 federal law requiring the U.S. president to notify Congress a month before they dismiss an inspector general and give a detailed reason for the decision.
- The plaintiffs argue that they should be retained or reinstated while having Trump follow the 2022 law if he wants to terminate them.
Full Story
Eight U.S. inspectors general who were fired in January 2025 by President Donald Trump are suing the administration to get their jobs back.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Eight inspectors general have filed a lawsuit claiming their firings were unlawful and seek to be reinstated in their positions at various federal agencies.
- The lawsuit argues that Congress was not given the legally required 30-day notices about the removals, a point emphasized by a Republican senator.
- The inspectors general state that their nonpartisan roles are critical for overseeing federal spending and preventing waste, fraud and abuse.
- The lawsuit alleges that Trump's actions have undermined the oversight needed for transparency and accountability in government.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Eight former inspectors general filed a lawsuit claiming their terminations by President Donald Trump were "unlawful and unjustified" and interfered with their oversight duties.
- The inspectors general stated that they were not given a "substantive, case-specific rationale" for their removal from office.
- Sens. Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin expressed concern over the firings, stating they were done "unlawfully and arbitrarily" in a letter to President Trump.
- White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the firings, stating the administration would "win in court" regarding the legal challenge.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
What law does the suit say Trump broke?
The lawsuit announced on Wednesday, Feb. 12, accuses Trump of breaking the law by failing to give U.S. Congress 30-days’ notice and a valid explanation for their terminations, citing a 2022 federal law requiring the president to notify Congress a month before they dismiss an inspector general and give a detailed reason for doing so.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Who are the plaintiffs?
The former government watchdogs include former inspectors general for the Pentagon, the departments of State, education, labor, agriculture, Veterans Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and Small Business Administration (SBA). Two of the inspectors general were originally appointed by Trump during his first term, former Pentagon Inspector General Robert Storch and former SBA Inspector General Michael Ware.
What do the plaintiffs want done?
The plaintiffs argue they should be retained or reinstated while having Trump follow the 2022 law if he wants to terminate them. The lawsuit is pushing for an injunction to enforce the law and asking a U.S. federal court for expedited consideration.
All of the inspectors general said they were notified of their firings by Trump appointees, but never heard from the president himself. Shortly after their terminations, the plaintiffs said access to “computers, phones and access badges” were cut off and the inspectors general were forced to collect their belongings from their agencies under supervision.
What is the bigger picture?
Since taking office, Trump has fired 19 inspectors general, including the U.S. Agency for International Development Inspector General Paul Martin, who is not part of the complaint, hours before the lawsuit was unveiled on Wednesday.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Martin’s firing came just days after he issued a report blaming a foreign aid freeze on nearly $500 million worth of undelivered food in jeopardy of spoilage.
Inspectors general are tasked with internal, independent checks of executive branch waste, fraud and abuse. They often perform intricate audits of government programs.
Has the White House responded to the lawsuit?
While the White House has not responded to the lawsuit, when asked about the legality of firing inspectors general, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump has the executive authority to do so, citing a U.S. Supreme Court case from 2020.
In that case, the high court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Director” could be fired by the president “without cause.”
[KARAH RUCKER]
EIGHT INSPECTORS GENERAL FIRED LAST MONTH BY PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP ARE SUING THE ADMINISTRATION TO GET THEIR JOBS BACK.
THE LAWSUIT ANNOUNCED WEDNESDAY ACCUSES TRUMP OF BREAKING THE LAW BY FAILING TO GIVE CONGRESS 30-DAYS NOTICE AND A VALID EXPLANATION FOR THEIR TERMINATIONS.
CITING A 2022 FEDERAL LAW REQUIRING THE PRESIDENT TO NOTIFY CONGRESS A MONTH BEFORE THEY DISMISS AN INSPECTOR GENERAL AND GIVE A DETAILED REASON.
THE FORMER GOVERNMENT WATCHDOGS INCLUDE FORMER INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE PENTAGON, THE DEPARTMENTS OF STATE, EDUCATION, LABOR, AG, V-A, D-H-H-S AND SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.
TWO OF THE I-GS WERE ORIGINALLY APPOINTED BY TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST TERM, FORMER PENTAGON I-G ROBERT STORCH AND FORMER S-B-A I-G MICHAEL WARE.
THE PLAINTIFFS ARGUE THEY SHOULD BE RETAINED OR REINSTATED WHILE HAVING TRUMP FOLLOW THE 2022 LAW IF HE WANTS TO TERMINATE THEM.
THE LAWSUIT IS PUSHING FOR AN INJUNCTION TO ENFORCE THE LAW AND ASKING A FEDERAL COURT FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION.
ALL OF THE I-GS SAY THEY WERE NOTIFIED OF THEIR FIRINGS BY TRUMP APPOINTEES BUT NEVER HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF.
SHORTLY AFTER THEIR TERMINATIONS, THE PLAINTIFFS SAID ACCESS TO “COMPUTERS, PHONES AND ACCESS BADGES” WERE CUT OFF AND THE I-GS WERE FORCED TO COLLECT THEIR BELONGINGS FROM THEIR AGENCIES UNDER SUPERVISION.
SINCE TAKING OFFICE TRUMP HAS FIRED 19 I-GS, INCLUDING THE U-S-A-I-D’S INSPECTOR GENERAL PAUL MARTIN, WHO IS NOT PART OF THE COMPLAINT, HOURS BEFORE THE LAWSUIT WAS UNVEILED.
MARTIN’S FIRING CAME JUST DAYS AFTER HE ISSUED A REPORT BLAMING A FOREIGN AID FREEZE ON NEARLY 500 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF UNDELIVERED FOOD IN JEOPARDY OF SPOILAGE.
INSPECTORS GENERAL ARE TASKED INTERNAL, INDEPENDENT CHECKS OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE.
THEY OFTEN PERFORM INTRICATE AUDITS OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS.
WHILE THE WHITE HOUSE HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE LAWSUIT, WHEN ASKED ABOUT THE LEGALITY OF FIRING I-GS THE PRESS SECRETARY KAROLINE LEAVITT SAID TRUMP HAS THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY TO DO SO CITING A SUPREME COURT CASE FROM 2020.
IN THAT CASE, THE HIGH COURT RULED IN A FIVE-FOUR DECISION THE “CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU’S DIRECTOR” COULD BE FIRED BY THE PRESIDENT “WITHOUT CAUSE.”
FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KARAH RUCKER.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Eight inspectors general have filed a lawsuit claiming their firings were unlawful and seek to be reinstated in their positions at various federal agencies.
- The lawsuit argues that Congress was not given the legally required 30-day notices about the removals, a point emphasized by a Republican senator.
- The inspectors general state that their nonpartisan roles are critical for overseeing federal spending and preventing waste, fraud and abuse.
- The lawsuit alleges that Trump's actions have undermined the oversight needed for transparency and accountability in government.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Eight former inspectors general filed a lawsuit claiming their terminations by President Donald Trump were "unlawful and unjustified" and interfered with their oversight duties.
- The inspectors general stated that they were not given a "substantive, case-specific rationale" for their removal from office.
- Sens. Chuck Grassley and Dick Durbin expressed concern over the firings, stating they were done "unlawfully and arbitrarily" in a letter to President Trump.
- White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the firings, stating the administration would "win in court" regarding the legal challenge.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Israeli airstrikes kill hundreds in Gaza as Hamas ceasefire talks stall
Watch 8:045 hrs ago -
Getty Images
How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?
Watch 1:5922 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Trapped Antarctic researchers reporting death threats from colleague
Watch 2:0922 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to driver burned by hot coffee
Watch 1:31Yesterday