THE JOHNNY DEPP-AMBER HEARD LIBEL TRIAL ENDED ABOUT SIX WEEKS AGO, BUT WHAT HOLLYWOOD DRAMA WOULD BE COMPLETE WITHOUT AT LEAST ONE SEQUEL, AM I RIGHT?
AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL IN JUNE, THE JURY AWARDED DEPP $15 MILLION AND HEARD $2 MILLION. IT WAS A SURPRISING DECISION, DECLARING BOTH SIDES VICTORIOUS.
AT LEAST THAT’S WHAT AMBER HEARD’S LAWYERS ARE NOW ARGUING. EARLIER THIS MONTH, THE HEARD LEGAL TEAM FILED A 51-PAGE MOTION WITH THE JUDGE IN THE CASE, ASKING HER TO SET ASIDE THE JURY’S VERDICT.
HEARD’S TEAM SAYS THE DUELING VERDICTS ARE INCONSISTENT AND IRRECONCILABLE, ADDING THAT THE AMOUNT AWARDED TO DEPP IS UNSUPPORTED BY FACTS.
ALSO, HEARD’S LAWYERS SAY THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A MISTRIAL BECAUSE ONE OF THE JURY MEMBERS WASN’T THE RIGHT PERSON.
ACCORDING TO COURT DOCUMENTS, A 77-YEAR-OLD MAN WAS INTITIALLY SUMMONED FOR JURY DUTY. BUT THE MAN’S SON, WHO HAS THE SAME NAME AND LIVES AT THE SAME ADDRESS, RESPONDED TO THE SUMMONS AND WAS SAT AS JUROR #15.
HEARD’S LAWYERS SAY SINCE VIRGINIA’S LAW ON JUROR IDENTITIES IS SO STRICT, THE CASE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY IS GROUNDS TO DECLARE A MISTRIAL.
SO HOW WILL THIS LATEST CHAPTER IN THE DEPP-HEARD DRAMA UNFOLD? STAY TUNED TO FIND OUT.