
Ben & Jerry’s founders come forward in support of ousted CEO
By Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer)
- Ben & Jerry’s announced support for the return of former CEO David Stever to his position. The brand accused Unilever of firing Stever for defending its progressive values and social activism.
- Ben & Jerry’s filed a lawsuit against Unilever, claiming the company violated merger terms by removing Stever without the independent board’s approval.
- Tensions between the ice cream brand and Unilever have persisted. Ben & Jerry’s has accused Unilever of silencing its efforts to speak out on social issues.
Full Story
Ben & Jerry’s founders came forward in support of the company’s ousted CEO. On Wednesday, March 19, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield expressed their support for David Stever after Unilever, the parent company of the ice cream brand, dismissed him.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ben & Jerry's claimed its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
- Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, 2025, about the removal of David Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
- Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
- Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Ben & Jerry's claimed that Unilever unlawfully fired its CEO, David Stever, without proper consultation on March 3, violating their merger agreement.
- The company alleges that Unilever removed Stever due to his support for the company's social and political activism.
- Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit accusing Unilever of attempting to silence its employees regarding its social mission and blocking various political statements, including those against the Trump administration.
- Chair Anuradha Mittal emphasized that Stever upheld Ben & Jerry's values despite Unilever's pressures for changes detrimental to its mission.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
“Dave has been a tireless champion of this company and its progressive values,” the founders said. “We believe there’s no one better to lead Ben & Jerry’s at this moment in its history.”
On Tuesday, March 18, Ben & Jerry’s accused Unilever of firing Stever for defending the company’s social and political activism initiatives.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
What’s in the court filing?
The ice cream brand accused Unilever of violating the merger agreement terms by removing Stever without board approval.
“While we don’t have insight into Unilever’s decision, we do know this: we stand 110% behind Dave,” the founders, who are no longer members of the brand’s independent board, wrote in their message. “As CEO, he’s continued to lead with courage and integrity, delivering on our Social Mission while posting strong global growth last year, his first full year in the role.”
A spokesperson for Unilever told The Wall Street Jounal on Wednesday that the company had made several attempts to connect with the board to discuss Stever.
A strained partnership
For years, the relationship between Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever has been strained.
In 2024, the ice cream brand also sued Unilever. It accused Unilever of silencing the company’s attempts to speak out in support of Palestinians and threatening to dismantle its independent board.
The ice cream brand’s independent board can decide about the brand’s social mission following the $326 million deal that Unilever reached to acquire in 2000.
According to this week’s court filing, Unilever criticized Stever in a performance review in January for repeatedly complying with the demands of the Independent Social Mission Board.
The ice cream brand also alleged that Unilever prevented the brand from posting tributes for Black History Month and supporting Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil. Authorities detained Khalil, a U.S. legal permanent resident, on March 8 for helping to lead pro-Palestinian demonstrations in 2024.
History of Ben & Jerry’s
Since Ben & Jerry’s launched in 1978, it has been recognized for its left-leaning advocacy, led by Cohen and Greenfield.
Over the years, the ice cream brand has continued introducing innovative flavors and engaging in activism.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What’s next?
In March 2024, Unilever announced its plans to spin off its ice cream division.
If the move is successful later this year, it will end the 25-year partnership between the two companies.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ben & Jerry's claimed its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
- Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, 2025, about the removal of David Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
- Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
- Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Ben & Jerry's claimed that Unilever unlawfully fired its CEO, David Stever, without proper consultation on March 3, violating their merger agreement.
- The company alleges that Unilever removed Stever due to his support for the company's social and political activism.
- Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit accusing Unilever of attempting to silence its employees regarding its social mission and blocking various political statements, including those against the Trump administration.
- Chair Anuradha Mittal emphasized that Stever upheld Ben & Jerry's values despite Unilever's pressures for changes detrimental to its mission.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Apple TV+
‘Severance’ season 3 official as Apple TV+ faces streaming losses
Watch 2:168 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Husband of former Rep. Cori Bush indicted for COVID-19 relief fraud
Watch 3:5515 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Ben & Jerry’s founders come forward in support of ousted CEO
Read19 hrs ago -
AP Images
What does Trump’s executive order mean for the Education Department?
Watch 8:51Yesterday