
DOJ pushes Google to sell Chrome over ‘monopoly’ practices as stocks dip
By Kalé Carey (Reporter), Jack Henry (Video Editor)
- The Department of Justice is pushing to break up Google by forcing the company to sell its Chrome browser and curb its exclusivity deals with companies. The move reflects bipartisan concern over Google’s dominance in the tech industry.
- The DOJ argued Google’s dominance over search engines limits consumer choice and competition.
- Google argues its success comes from innovation, not monopoly tactics.
Full Story
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is taking action against Google’s dominant influence over the tech industry. Court documents reveal that the government is pushing for an overhaul of the company, aiming to weaken its control by breaking it up.
It’s a move that signals bipartisan consensus, as both the Trump and Biden administrations agree on the need to curb Google’s monopolistic behavior.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- The Department of Justice argues that Google must sell its Chrome browser as part of a remedy for its monopoly in search services and advertising, emphasizing the need for competition in the market.
- The DOJ argues that divesting Chrome can help restore competition in search services, emphasizing the negative impact of Google's monopoly.
- Google claims that the DOJ's demands could harm consumers and the economy, insisting its own proposals are aimed at restoring market competition.
- The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to compel Google to sell its Chrome web browser in response to its monopolistic practices, as confirmed in court filings.
- U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google maintained an illegal monopoly and termed the company a "monopolist," citing its control over the search market and payments made to partners like Apple.
- The DOJ's proposal indicates that Google must "promptly and fully divest Chrome" to ensure fair competition and suggests divesting its Android operating system if selling Chrome does not adequately address competition concerns.
- Google has opposed the DOJ's plans, arguing that its market dominance is due to superior service and claiming that the proposals could threaten consumers and national security.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Stock decline amid DOJ push
Shares of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, took a hit on Monday, March 10, dropping more than 4%. The DOJ’s case against the tech giant has raised serious concerns about the company’s growing dominance and its potential impact on the world.
In a recent filing, the DOJ highlighted that American consumers rely on Google for everything from emergency searches to everyday needs, with the company being described as “the gateway to the internet.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The DOJ’s case against Google
One of the main issues, according to the DOJ, is that Americans never actually chose Google as their search engine, the company essentially chose it for them. As part of its plan to dismantle Google’s monopolistic practices, the DOJ is pushing for the company to sell its Chrome web browser, which is used by over 3 billion people worldwide.
The DOJ asserts Chrome is an important search access point, and breaking it up would provide an opportunity for competitors to establish themselves in the search market, free from Google’s control.
This marks the second time the DOJ has sought to have Google sell Chrome. The Biden administration led the call in November 2024 to break up Google.
The Biden administration also pushed for Google to divest its artificial intelligence investments, such as those in OpenAI. The Trump administration has backed off from calling for Google to sell off its AI investments.
Additional measures to dismantle Google’s power
In addition to targeting Chrome, the DOJ is seeking to block Google from making exclusive deals with companies like Apple to keep its search engine as the default on iOS devices, including iPhones and Macs. However, the proposal does not prevent Google from paying Apple for services unrelated to search.
Another significant element of the proposal involves Google being required to share its search data with competitors. The DOJ argues that this move would promote equal opportunities in the search market, providing a level playing field for smaller companies.
The DOJ has also indicated if these measures are not enough to reduce Google’s monopoly, it may push for the company to sell Android.
Google makes its case
Google, however, strongly disagrees with the DOJ’s proposals. The company argues that the government’s actions will harm American consumers, the economy and national security. In response to the DOJ’s request for Chrome’s sale, Google insists its success stems from innovation and key investments, not monopoly tactics.
Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, in defense of the company, argues that people use Google because they want to, not because they have no choice.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
In appealing the DOJ’s proposal, Google unveiled its own remedies, suggesting that other search browsers should be allowed to offer their services, but without restricting users to Google alone. Google proposed offering users the flexibility to choose their preferred search engine.
As the case continues to unfold, both the DOJ and Google will head back to court in April, with a final ruling expected later this summer. Regardless of the outcome, Google is anticipated to appeal the decision.
[Kalé Carey]
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS TARGETING GOOGLE’S IMMENSE INFLUENCE OVER THE TECH INDUSTRY.
COURT DOCUMENTS REVEAL THE GOVERNMENT’S PLAN TO LOOSEN THE SEARCH GIANT’S GRIP BY BREAKING UP THE COMPANY. IT’S A SIGN THE TRUMP ADMIN IS ON A SIMILAR PAGE AS BIDEN’S WHEN IT COMES TO GOOGLE’S MONOPOLY.
SHARES OF PARENT COMPANY ALPHABET DROPPED MORE THAN FOUR PERCENT ON MONDAY AMID A BROADER MARKET SELL-OFF.
A RECENT FILING SAYS AMERICAN PEOPLE DEPEND ON GOOGLE, FROM EMERGENCIES TO EVERYDAY NEEDS, WITH GOOGLE DESCRIBED AS “the gateway to the internet.”
THE PROBLEM? THE DOJ CLAIMS AMERICANS NEVER ACTUALLY **CHOSE GOOGLE AS THEIR SEARCH ENGINE—GOOGLE SIMPLY CHOSE IT FOR THEM.
NOW THE DOJ IS PUSHING FOR GOOGLE TO SELL ITS CHROME WEB BROWSER, USED BY MORE THAN THREE BILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE.
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WROTE CHROME IS, “an important search access point — to provide an opportunity for a new rival to operate a significant gateway to search the internet, free of Google’s monopoly control.”
THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THIS REQUEST HAS COME UP. THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION LED THE CALL IN NOVEMBER TO BREAK UP GOOGLE, BUT THEY ALSO WANTED TO SEE GOOGLE SELL OFF ITS INVESTMENTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, LIKE WITH OPEN A-I.
THIS IS WHERE BIDEN’S DOJ AND TRUMP’S DOJ SPLIT. TRUMP’S DOJ IS NO LONGER CALLING FOR GOOGLE TO SPIN OFF ITS A-I INVESTMENTS.
THE BALL IS NOW IN THE COURT OF THE SAME JUDGE WHO RULED LAST AUGUST THAT GOOGLE’S PRACTICES WERE ILLEGAL BY KEEPING ITS PRODUCTS AT THE FOREFRONT.
ANTITRUST REGULATORS WERE TASKED WITH FIGURING OUT HOW TO DISMANTLE GOOGLE’S ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES.
THE DOJ ISN’T JUST TARGETING CHROME. THEY ALSO WANT TO STOP GOOGLE FROM MAKING DEALS WITH APPLE TO KEEP ITS SEARCH ENGINE AS THE DEFAULT ON I-O-S DEVICES LIKE MACS AND IPHONES. THE PROPOSAL DOESN’T STOP GOOGLE FROM PAYING APPLE FOR SERVICES UNRELATED TO SEARCH.
THE PROPOSAL ALSO WANTS GOOGLE TO SHARE ITS SEARCH DATA WITH ITS COMPETITION, A MOVE THE DOJ SAYS WILL PROMOTE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AMONG COMPANIES.
IF THE PROPOSED CHANGES DON’T GO FAR ENOUGH, THE DOJ SAYS IT MIGHT ALSO PUSH FOR GOOGLE TO SELL ANDROID, BUT FOR NOW, THAT’S NOT ON THE TABLE.
GOOGLE ARGUES AMERICAN CONSUMERS, THE ECONOMY AND NATIONAL SECURITY WILL ALL TAKE A HIT WITH THE DOJ’S DEMANDS.
FOLLOWING THE FIRST REQUEST TO SELL CHROME, GOOGLE SAYS THEIR SUCCESS IS DUE TO INNOVATION AND KEY INVESTMENTS—NOT MONOPOLY SCHEMES.
GOOGLE’S VICE PRESIDENT OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS SAYS PEOPLE USE GOOGLE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO.
IN APPEALING THE DOJ’S PROPOSAL, GOOGLE UNVEILED REMEDIES OF THEIR OWN, SUCH AS ALLOWING OTHER SEARCH BROWSERS TO OFFER THEIR SERVICES, BUT WITHOUT LIMITING USERS TO ONLY GOOGLE—INSTEAD, PROVIDING THEM WITH THE FLEXIBILITY TO CHOOSE THEIR SEARCH ENGINE OF CHOICE.
THE DOJ AND GOOGLE HEAD BACK TO COURT IN APRIL BUT A FINAL RULING IS EXPECTED IN THE SUMMER.
NO MATTER THE OUTCOME, GOOGLE IS EXPECTED TO APPEAL.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M KALÉ CAREY.
READ MORE STORIES LIKE THIS AND OTHER FACT BASED NEWS ON THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP OR S-A-N DOT COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- The Department of Justice argues that Google must sell its Chrome browser as part of a remedy for its monopoly in search services and advertising, emphasizing the need for competition in the market.
- The DOJ argues that divesting Chrome can help restore competition in search services, emphasizing the negative impact of Google's monopoly.
- Google claims that the DOJ's demands could harm consumers and the economy, insisting its own proposals are aimed at restoring market competition.
- The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to compel Google to sell its Chrome web browser in response to its monopolistic practices, as confirmed in court filings.
- U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google maintained an illegal monopoly and termed the company a "monopolist," citing its control over the search market and payments made to partners like Apple.
- The DOJ's proposal indicates that Google must "promptly and fully divest Chrome" to ensure fair competition and suggests divesting its Android operating system if selling Chrome does not adequately address competition concerns.
- Google has opposed the DOJ's plans, arguing that its market dominance is due to superior service and claiming that the proposals could threaten consumers and national security.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Here are the 60 universities under investigation by the Trump administration
Read3 hrs ago -
Getty Images
White House defends Musk comments on Social Security, Medicaid
Watch 4:228 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Trump envoy to meet Putin in Moscow over potential ceasefire in Ukraine
Watch 1:3511 hrs ago -
AP Images
Why DC is removing its ‘Black Lives Matter’ street mural
Watch 3:2011 hrs ago