- Drake is suing Universal Music Group for distributing Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us,” which he claims falsely accuses him of being a pedophile. UMG argues the lawsuit is baseless, dismissing the track as part of hip-hop culture.
- UMG maintains that diss tracks are rhetorical, not defamatory, and highlights Drake’s history of using similar tactics in rap battles.
- The feud between Drake and Lamar continues to escalate, with both artists trading diss tracks and sparking controversy over their lyrics.
Full Story
Drake’s legal battle with Universal Music Group (UMG) may be short-lived. The label has filed a motion to dismiss his defamation lawsuit, arguing that diss tracks are not defamation but a staple of hip-hop culture.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 18% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn more
Left 64%
Center 18%
Right 18%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™
UMG says lawsuit has no merit
Drake sued UMG over its distribution of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.” He claimed the song pushed a “false and malicious” narrative that he is a pedophile. But in its filing, UMG dismissed the lawsuit as baseless.
Point phone camera here
“Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds,” UMG’s motion stated. “Plaintiff’s complaint is utterly without merit and should be dismissed with prejudice.”
The label also blamed Drake for the fallout of his rap battle with Lamar.
Drake vs. Kendrick Lamar feud escalates
Drake and Lamar have been trading diss tracks since last year, fueling a rap feud that took over social media. But Lamar’s “Not Like Us” landed hard, becoming an unofficial anthem of the summer.
Drake hit back with his own diss tracks, including “Family Matters,” which accused Lamar of domestic abuse and infidelity. However, he didn’t stop there. He also took legal action against UMG, claiming the label actively promoted Lamar’s accusations.
The lawsuit follows Drake’s withdrawal of a separate petition accusing UMG and Spotify of artificially inflating the track’s streaming numbers.
Drake’s legal team pushes back
Drake’s attorney, Michael J. Gottlieb, defended the lawsuit, accusing UMG of profiting from harmful misinformation.
“UMG wants to pretend that this is about a rap battle in order to distract its shareholders, artists, and the public from a simple truth: a greedy company is finally being held responsible for profiting from dangerous misinformation that has already resulted in multiple acts of violence,” Gottlieb told Pitchfork.
In May 2024, a security guard was shot outside Drake’s Toronto mansion after the release of “Not Like Us,” which included references to allegations of child exploitation.
UMG says diss tracks aren’t defamation
UMG’s motion argues that “Not Like Us” is a rap diss, not a factual claim. The filing also calls out Drake’s history of rap feuds, saying he has engaged in the same kind of rhetoric.
“There is no basis for a claim that any person at UMG had the subjective intent to publish false factual statements about Drake,” the motion states. “UMG released a rap diss track, conveying fiery rhetoric and insults—not factual assessments, much less false ones.”
The label also pointed out that it handled the distribution of Drake’s “Family Matters” in the same way it distributed Lamar’s track.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Drake settles lawsuit with iHeartMedia
Drake’s legal battle isn’t just with UMG. He also accused iHeartMedia of taking illegal payments from UMG to boost “Not Like Us” on the radio. That lawsuit was settled earlier this month.
Meanwhile, Drake is pushing forward with his case against UMG. The court recently denied the label’s request to pause discovery. Just a day earlier, Drake filed a motion in a Texas state court seeking permission to depose a UMG executive and obtain documents related to whether the label actively promoted Lamar’s track.
With both sides standing firm, the legal fight over “Not Like Us” is far from over.
[KENNEDY FELTON
Drake took his rap beef with Kendrick Lamar from the booth to the courtroom, filing a defamation suit against his own label—Universal Music Group (UMG). But now, UMG is firing back, filing a motion to dismiss, essentially saying this isn’t a legal matter—it’s just hip-hop.
“Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds. Plaintiff’s complaint is utterly without merit and should be dismissed with prejudice.” These are the words from UMG’s introduction in their file to dismiss Drake’s defamation suit, ultimately blaming him for seemingly losing the battle against Lamar.
Let’s quickly rewind. This all kicked off last year when Drake and Lamar dropped diss tracks back and forth that had the internet in a chokehold. But Lamar landed what many called the knockout punch with “Not Like Us,” a track that became the unofficial anthem of the summer for many. Drake—never one to back down—fired back in court. He accuses UMG, a label both he and Lamar are signed to, of pushing a “false and malicious” narrative that he’s a pedophile, a narrative “Not Like Us” heavily implies. This defamation suit comes after Drake quietly dropped a separate petition accusing his label and Spotify of artificially boosting the song’s streams.
Drake’s lead attorney, Michael J. Gottlieb, is standing firm. In a statement to Pitchfork, he said, “UMG wants to pretend that this is about a rap battle in order to distract its shareholders, artists, and the public from a simple truth: A greedy company is finally being held responsible for profiting from dangerous misinformation that has already resulted in multiple acts of violence.”
But UMG isn’t backing down either. Their motion to dismiss argues that “Not Like Us” is just a diss track—full of fiery rhetoric and insults, not actual claims. And they say distributing the song does not mean they endorsed any falsehoods about Drake. One of their lawyers even pointed out that UMG handled Drake’s diss track “Family Matters” the exact same way, which accuses Lamar of domestic abuse and infidelity.
Drake has also taken legal action against iHeartMedia, accusing them of accepting illegal payments from UMG to boost “Not Like Us” radio airplay. That suit was settled this month. Meanwhile, the court just denied UMG’s request to pause discovery on Drake’s defamation suit. Just a day before that, Drake filed to depose a UMG executive and obtain internal documents about whether the label simply distributed the song or actively worked behind the scenes to push it out further.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 18% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn more
Left 64%
Center 18%
Right 18%
Bias Summary
Bias Comparison
Media outlets on the left
frame UMG’s actions as potentially endangering their artists by spreading a “false and malicious narrative.”
Media outlets on the right
emphasize Drake’s alleged hypocrisy and characterized the lawsuit as an attempt to save face after “losing” the rap battle.
Report an issue with this comparison
Bias Distribution
24 other sources covering this story
Total News Sources
24
Leaning Left
7
Center
2
Leaning Right
2
Last Updated
3 days ago
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?
-
Getty Images
Trapped Antarctic researchers reporting death threats from colleague
-
Reuters
Trump says he’ll speak with Putin on Tuesday about ending Ukraine war
-
Getty Images
March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity
