Feds charge 70 NYC public housing officials in historic DOJ bribery bust

[KARAH RUCKER]

WHILE CITIES IN THE U-S GRAPPLE WITH HOUSING AFFORDABILITY, OFFICIALS AT THE COUNTRY’S LARGEST HOUSING AUTHORITY, ARE IN THE HEADLINES — , NOT FOR PUTTING ROOFS OVER PEOPLE’S HEADS… BUT FOR ALLEGEDLY LINING THEIR OWN POCKETS.

DOZENS OF EMPLOYEES AT THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY ARRESTED AND ACCUSED OF TAKING BRIBES. 

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNOUNCING THAT IT WAS THE BIGGEST FEDERAL BRIBERY BUST IN ITS HISTORY

DAMIAN WILLIAMS – US ATTORNEY FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: “THE CORRUPTION WE HAVE ALLEGED INFECTED EVERY CORNER OF THIS CITY.”

US ATTORNEY DAMIAN WILLIAMS SPEAKING TO REPORTERS ON TUESDAY SAID THE D-O-J CHARGED 70 CURRENT AND FORMER NYCHA (NIGH-CHA) EMPLOYEES FOR ALLEGEDLY ACCEPTING A TOTAL OF TWO MILLION DOLLARS IN BRIBES FROM CONTRACTORS . BRIBES WILLIAMS SAID HAD BECOME “BUSINESS AS USUAL” AT THE AGENCY

DAMIAN WILLIAMS – US ATTORNEY FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: “SUPERINTENDENTS, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS, AND OTHERS HELD GREAT POWER IN DECIDING WHICH CONTRACTORS WOULD RECEIVE SMALL CONTRACTS FOR REPAIR OR CONSTRUCTION WORK, THESE CONTRACTS WERE VALUED AT UNDER $10,000.”

CONTRACTS UNDER 10-THOUSAND-DOLLARS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH A PUBLIC BIDDING PROCESS AND ARE GIVEN TO CONTRACTORS AT THE DISCRETION OF A NYCHA OFFICIALS. 

DISCRETION WILLIAMS ALLEGES WAS ABUSED BY THE NYCHA DEFENDANTS.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS – US ATTORNEY FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: “AFTER A CONTRACTOR FINISHED THEIR WORK THE SUPERINTENDENT OR ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT NEEDED TO SIGN OFF ON THE WORK SO THE CONTRACTOR COULD GET PAID BY NYCHA. BUT WE ALLEGE THAT THESE DEFENDANTS DEMANDED THEIR OWN CUT IN THE FORM OF CASH BRIBES.”

WILLIAMS SAYS OF THE 335 NYCHA HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS ACROSS NEW YORK CITY, NEARLY ONE THIRD OF THOSE WERE INVOLVED IN THE BRIBERY SCHEME.

1 IN 17 NEW YORKERS LIVE IN NYCHA HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY RECEIVES MORE THAN 1-POINT-5-BILLION DOLLARS IN FEDERAL FUNDING EVERY YEAR.

ACCORDING TO THE INDICTMENT, THE 70 DEFENDANTS ARE EACH BEING CHARGED WITH SOLICITATION AND RECEIPT OF A BRIBE WHICH CARRIES A MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF 10 YEARS IN PRISON.

THE DEFENDANTS ARE ALSO CHARGED WITH EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT WHICH CARRIES A MAXIMUM OF 20 YEARS IN PRISON.