data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dcbb/0dcbba079d9043ff6ba886c98f4fde6856ef82d2" alt="The future for the Minnesota House is in limbo, as a judge sided with boycotting Democrats to block Republicans from working without them."
MN Supreme Court rules against state House GOP amid Dem boycott
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Roey Hadar (Producer), Joey Nunez (Video Editor)
The future for the tightly split Minnesota state legislature is in limbo, as a judge sided with Democrats in ruling that the state House needs a majority of all seats to do business. The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that 68 of 134 House members are a quorum, meaning that the House’s 67 Republicans aren’t enough to make the House move.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 17% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Minnesota’s House deadlocked, with Democrats winning 67 seats and Republicans winning 67 seats. However, with one Democrat ineligible to serve due to residency issues, Democrats have 66 members and one vacancy.
Before the one Democrat pulled out, Democrats and Republicans reached a power-sharing agreement. However, Republicans signaled they would use their temporary advantage to elect a House speaker and put Republicans in charge of House committees. It’s a move that could prove difficult to reverse in a tied chamber, so Democrats decided to boycott.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e297/5e297bcdb16b0093ed78352ff46fadc4a3429dc9" alt="QR code for SAN app download"
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
When the legislature started on Monday, Jan. 13, Republicans picked their House leader, Lisa DeMuth, as speaker. Democrats stayed out of the chamber, swearing in their members privately and staying out since then to avoid giving Republicans a quorum.
The judge did not definitively rule that the Republicans’ acts so far in the legislature were invalid. Instead, the judge urged Democrats and Republicans to negotiate a resolution.
While lawmakers expected the impasse to end after a special election on Tuesday, Jan. 28 to fill the vacant seat the state Supreme Court said Gov. Tim Walz called the election too early. The previous occupant of the seat was still in office at the time of the December announcement.
No date has been set, but an election is unlikely to occur before March.
And more House members could face elections before the next scheduled ones in 2026. Republicans have suggested they could file petitions to work toward holding recall elections against Democratic lawmakers boycotting the House session.
While lawmakers in other states, including Texas Democrats and Oregon Republicans, have boycotted to block the other party from advancing laws, Minnesota law allows for recalls if lawmakers do not perform the duties of their office.
LAUREN TAYLOR: The future for the tightly split Minnesota state legislature is in limbo, as a judge sided with Democrats in ruling that the state House needs a majority of all seats to do business.
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that 68 of 134 House members are a quorum, meaning that the House’s 67 Republicans aren’t enough to make the House move.
Minnesota’s House deadlocked, with Democrats winning 67 seats and Republicans winning 67 seats. But with one Democrat ineligible to serve due to residency issues, Democrats have 66 members and one vacancy.
Before the one Democrat pulled out, Democrats and Republicans reached a power-sharing agreement.
But Republicans signaled they would use their temporary advantage to elect a House speaker and put Republicans in charge of House committees, a move that could prove difficult to reverse in a tied chamber.
So Democrats decided to boycott.
When the legislature started on January 13th, Republicans picked their House leader Lisa DeMuth as speaker, but Democrats stayed out of the chamber, swearing in their members privately and staying out since then to avoid giving Republicans a quorum.
The judge did not definitively rule that the Republicans’ acts so far in the legislature were invalid and instead urged Democrats and Republicans to negotiate a resolution.
But while lawmakers expected the impasse to end after a special election on January 28th to fill the vacant seat, the state Supreme Court said last week that Gov. Tim Walz called the election too early, as the previous occupant of the seat was still in office at the time of the December announcement.
No date has been set but an election is unlikely to occur before March.
And more House members could face elections before the next scheduled ones in 2026. Republicans have suggested they could file petitions to work toward holding recall elections against Democratic lawmakers boycotting the House session.
While lawmakers in other states, including Texas Democrats and Oregon Republicans, have boycotted in an effort to block the other party from advancing laws, Minnesota law allows for recalls if lawmakers do not perform the duties of their office.
For Straight Arrow News, I’m Lauren Taylor.
And for all the latest updates on this and other top stories, download the Straight Arrow News app or visit SAN.com.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 17% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Zelenskyy leaves WH early; Trump says he can come back when ‘ready for peace’
Watch 2:244 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Police raid California mayor’s house, city hall in $14 million corruption probe
Watch 2:0519 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Widely-used handgun banned from Washington state training facilities
Watch 2:4020 hrs ago -
Reuters
Connecticut teen sues former school after graduating unable to read, write
Read22 hrs ago