![A federal judge will decide if a New Hampshire bakery's mural is protected by the First Amendment.](https://san.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CLEAN-BAKERY-MURAL_AP-Images_featuredImage_Thu-Feb-13-2025.jpg?w=1920)
Mouthwatering mural or oversized ad? Judge to decide fate of pastry painting
By Craig Nigrelli (Anchor), Shea Taylor (Producer), Michael Edwards (Video Editor)
- A federal judge will decide if the 90-square-foot mural above a New Hampshire bakery is art or an advertisement in a case that could set a new precedent for what’s considered free speech.
- The mural at Leavitt’s Country Bakery in Conway, New Hampshire, depicts the pastries the business sells, which the town’s zoning board says classifies it as a sign that does not adhere to town code.
- The judge will decide if the painting is protected by the First Amendment.
Full Story
A federal judge in New Hampshire will decide if a bakery’s mural depicting items it sells is breaking the law. At the center of the argument, is a small roadside bakery in the town of Conway, New Hampshire, tucked away about 130 miles north of Boston along the state’s border with Maine.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
What’s the issue?
The mural above Leavitt’s Country Bakery was painted by local high school students in 2022. Since it went up, it has attracted a lot of attention – including from a town zoning officer.
While the 90-square-foot area where it’s painted is perfect for a mural, according to Conway’s zoning board, it’s not art. The board claims it’s an advertisement since it shows items that can be bought inside.
![QR code for SAN app download](https://san.com/wp-content/themes/straightarrow-2023/assets/images/app-download-block-qr-code.png)
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Advertisements fall under the category of signs. The town has strict rules about how big signs can be, which is a maximum of four times smaller than the mural is.
Why is it a problem?
The zoning board said if the mural showed something other than what’s for sale inside the bakery, it would not be considered a sign and therefore would not be an issue.
The bakery’s owner, Sean Young, was ordered to either change or remove the painting or face possible misdemeanor criminal charges and fines. After Young’s appeals were rejected by the zoning board, he sued the town in federal court in 2023 saying its determination violated his right to free speech.
Court documents show the town’s lawyers argue size restrictions on signs preserve the town’s aesthetics, promote safety and ensure equal enforcement. Young’s lawyers argue the rule is overly vague and town leaders can’t prove anything bad will happen if the painting stays up.
[Craig]
IS A GIANT, COLORFUL MURAL DEPICTING BAKED GOODS IN ALL THEIR GLORY FREE SPEECH OR JUST AN OVERSIZED ADVERTISEMENT?
WE’LL SOON FIND OUT.
A FEDERAL JUDGE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE WILL DECIDE IF A BAKERY’S MURAL DEPICTING THE DELICIOUS DELICACIES IT SELLS – IS BREAKING THE LAW.
AT THE CENTER OF THE ARGUMENT IS A SMALL ROADSIDE BAKERY IN THE TOWN OF CONWAY – TUCKED AWAY ABOUT 130 MILES NORTH OF BOSTON ALONG NEW HAMPSHIRE’S BORDER WITH MAINE.
THE MURAL ABOVE LEAVITT’S COUNTRY BAKERY WAS PAINTED BY LOCAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN 20-22 AND SINCE IT WENT UP IT’S ATTRACTED LOTS OF ATTENTION – INCLUDING FROM A TOWN ZONING OFFICER.
HERE’S THE PROBLEM – THE 90-SQUARE-FOOT AREA WHERE IT’S PAINTED IS PERFECT FOR A MURAL… BUT ACCORDING TO CONWAY’S ZONING BOARD IT’S **NOT** ART – IT’S AN ADVERTISEMENT, SINCE IT SHOWS THE TASTY TREATS YOU CAN BUY INSIDE.
ADVERTISEMENTS FALL UNDER THE CATEGORY OF SIGNS, AND THE TOWN HAS STRICT RULES ABOUT HOW BIG SIGNS CAN BE… WHICH IS A MAXIMUM OF FOUR TIMES **SMALLER** THAN THE MURAL IS.
THE ZONING BOARD SAYS IF THE MURAL SHOWED SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHAT’S FOR SALE INSIDE THE BAKERY, IT WOULD **NOT** BE CONSIDERED A SIGN AND THEREFORE WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.
THE BAKERY’S OWNER, SEAN YOUNG, WAS ORDERED TO EITHER CHANGE OR REMOVE THE PAINTING… OR FACE POSSIBLE MISDEMEANOR CRIMINAL CHARGES AND FINES.
AFTER YOUNG’S APPEALS WERE REJECTED BY THE ZONING BOARD – HE SUED THE TOWN IN FEDERAL COURT IN 20-23… SAYING THEIR DETERMINATION VIOLATES HIS RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.
COURT DOCUMENTS SHOW THE TOWN’S LAWYERS ARGUE SIZE RESTRICTIONS ON SIGNS PRESERVE THE TOWN’S AESTHETICS, PROMOTE SAFETY, AND ENSURE EQUAL ENFORCEMENT… BUT YOUNG’S LAWYERS ARGUE THE RULE IS OVERLY VAGUE AND TOWN LEADERS CAN’T PROVE ANYTHING BAD WILL HAPPEN IF THE PAINTING STAYS UP.
WE’LL BE SURE TO KEEP YOU UPDATED AND WHAT HAPPENS – TO MAKE SURE YOU DON’T MISS A THING, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Judge clears way for Trump’s federal employee buyout program to proceed
Watch 2:3014 hrs ago -
Reuters
California homeowners on hook for half of $1 billion last resort insurer surcharge
Read17 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Musk says DOGE found mine storing government retirement papers
Read19 hrs ago -
Greater Second Missionary Baptist Church
‘Violence is necessary’: Tennessee pastor clarifies sermon about Elon Musk
Read20 hrs ago