[Lauren Taylor]
IT’S LONG BEEN DEBATED WHETHER OR NOT OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPMENT HAS AN IMPACT ON MARINE LIFE.
NOW – THE SUPREME COURT COULD POTENTIALLY BE PRIMED TO WEIGH-IN.
A MASSACHUSETTS NON-PROFIT IS CHALLENGING THE FEDERAL APPROVAL OF AN OFFSHORE WIND FARM THEY SAY HAS DIRECTLY IMPACTED WHALE MORTALITY IN THE AREA.
ACK FOR WHALES ARGUES THERE WERE FLAWS IN THE PERMITTING OF THE VINEYARD WIND PROJECT OFF THE NANTUCKET COAST.
THEY SAY FEDERAL AGENCIES DIDN’T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT THE PROJECT WOULD HAVE ON ENDANGERED WHALE SPECIES.
A DISTRICT COURT DISMISSED THEIR LAWSUIT AND IN APRIL OF THIS YEAR – AN APPEALS COURT SIDED WITH THE LOWER COURT’S DECISION.
HOWEVER – OVER THE SUMMER THE SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE ‘CHEVRON DOCTRINE’ – WHICH ALLOWED FOR A BROAD INTERPRETATION OF LAWS DIRECTLY AT PLAY IN THE VINEYARD WIND CASE.
NOW ACK FOR WHALES IS HOPING THE HIGH COURT WILL REVIEW THE INITIAL RULING.
THE GROUP POINTS TO THIS SUMMER WHEN BLADE DEBRIS WASHED UP ON A NANTUCKET BEACH.
IN THE PETITION TO THE SUPREME COURT THEY SAY THE GOVERNMENT ISN’T USING THE “best available scientific and commercial data available.”
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BELIEVES THE CURRENT RULINGS ARE CORRECT AND THAT THE VINEYARD WIND PROJECT ALREADY CONSIDERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING THE APPROVAL PHASE.
THE HIGH COURT WILL REVIEW THE PETITION EARLY NEXT YEAR.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR