Skip to main content
International

The US backs away from plastic production limits in UN treaty: Report

Listen
Share

The Biden administration is reportedly removing its support for a cap on plastic production. Governments from around the world are set to come together in Busan, South Korea on Monday, Nov. 25, for the fifth and final round of negotiations for a United Nations global treaty to end plastic pollution.

Grist reports that White House staffers told advocacy groups last week they no longer see a mandatory production cap as a realistic possibility. Instead, the staffers suggest a flexible approach where countries would set their own voluntary targets for reducing plastic production.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

According to Fast Company, this goes against a similar meeting in August where the Biden administration mentioned supporting the limiting of plastic production joining countries like Norway and Peru. 

A spokesperson for the White House Council on Environmental Quality told Grist they believe there are different ways to achieve the reduction, which could include a tax on plastic production. 

The World Wildlife Fund said over 90% of the plastic that pollutes our planet is made up of single-use plastics like plastic bags and cutlery and microplastics like what is added to cosmetic products.

Some countries and environmental groups argue that voluntary targets won’t be enough to curb pollution and said the U.S. backing out could weaken the treaty.

Oil exporting nations want to focus more on recycling and waste management instead of directly curbing new plastic creation, which could impact their bottom line in the petrochemical industry.

Tags: , , , , ,

[Jack Aylmer]

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS REPORTEDLY REMOVING ITS SUPPORT FOR A CAP ON PLASTIC PRODUCTION. 

GOVERNMENTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD ARE SET TO COME TOGETHER IN BUSAN, SOUTH KOREA MONDAY, FOR THE FIFTH AND FINAL ROUND OF NEGOTIATIONS FOR A UNITED NATIONS  GLOBAL TREATY TO END PLASTIC POLLUTION. 

GRIST REPORTS WHITE HOUSE STAFFERS TOLD ADVOCACY GROUPS LAST WEEK THEY NO LONGER SEE A MANDATORY PRODUCTION CAP AS A REALISTIC POSSIBILITY.

INSTEAD, THE STAFFERS SUGGEST A FLEXIBLE APPROACH WHERE COUNTRIES WOULD SET THEIR OWN VOLUNTARY TARGETS FOR REDUCING PLASTIC PRODUCTION. 

ACCORDING TO FAST COMPANY, THIS GOES AGAINST A SIMILAR MEETING IN AUGUST WHERE THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION MENTIONED SUPPORTING THE LIMITING OF PLASTIC PRODUCTION JOINING COUNTRIES LIKE NORWAY AND PERU. 

A SPOKESPERSON FOR THE WHITE HOUSE COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY NOW TELLING GRIST THEY BELIEVE THERE ARE DIFFERENT WAYS TO ACHIEVE THE REDUCTION WHICH COULD INCLUDE A TAX ON PLASTIC PRODUCTION. 

THE WORLD WILDLIFE FUND SAYS OVER 90 PERCENT OF THE PLASTIC THAT POLLUTES OUR PLANET IS MADE UP OF SINGLE USE PLASTICS LIKE PLASTIC BAGS AND CUTLERY … AND MICROPLASTICS LIKE WHAT’S ADDED TO COSMETIC PRODUCTS.

SOME COUNTRIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS ARGUE THAT VOLUNTARY TARGETS WON’T BE ENOUGH TO CURB POLLUTION AND SAY THE U-S BACKING OUT COULD WEAKEN THE TREATY.

OIL EXPORTING NATIONS WANT TO FOCUS MORE ON RECYCLING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT INSTEAD OF DIRECTLY CURBING NEW PLASTIC CREATION, WHICH COULD IMPACT THEIR BOTTOM LINE IN THE PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY.

FOR SAN – I’M JACK ALYMER.

FOR ALL YOUR LATEST NEWS HEADLINES – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.

U.S.

136 million US adults eligible for semaglutide shots: Study

Listen
Share

Researchers estimate 136 million adults, or about half the U.S. adult population, are eligible for semaglutide shots like Ozempic or Wegovy. That’s according to a new study published in JAMA Network on Monday, Nov. 18.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 75% Center 25% Right 0%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Nearly 26,000 adults participated in the study, which found that 8,504 of them were eligible to receive semaglutide shots for diabetes, weight management and/or preventing cardiovascular disease.

Semaglutide shots treat Type 2 diabetes by increasing an individual’s insulin levels, according to the Mayo Clinic, and may be used for other purposes.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Researchers found the mean age of participants to be 50.7 years, with 49.1% being women. They also estimate “that more than 39 million adults qualify for indications other than weight management alone, a substantial increase over the estimated 15 million currently taking” the medication.

Nearly 40 million adults are eligible for the medication to treat diabetes or as a secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease.

The study’s authors say that based on their calculations, nearly 4.3 million individuals without diabetes but with cardiovascular disease may gain coverage for the medication.

The researchers noted that more than half of U.S. adults who have already taken semaglutide medication shared that affordability is a barrier to accessing it and there should be an increased effort to promote equitable access for people who need the medication.

The Mayo Clinic lists a slew of side effects of taking semaglutide, which can include belching, excess air or gas in the intestines, stomach pain, blurred vision, confusion, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, among others.

Tags: , , , , ,

[Lauren Taylor]

RESEARCHERS ESTIMATE 136 MILLION ADULTS OR ABOUT HALF THE U-S ADULT POPULATION ARE ELIGIBLE FOR SEMAGLUTIDE SHOTS LIKE OZEMPIC OR WEGOVY, ACCORDING TO A NEW STUDY PUBLISHED IN JAMA NETWORK THIS WEEK.

NEARLY 26,000 ADULTS PARTICIPATED IN THE STUDY WHICH FOUND 8,504 HUNDRED OF THEM WERE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE SEMAGLUTIDE SHOTS FOR DIABETES, WEIGHT MANAGEMENT AND-OR PREVENTING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE.

SEMAGLUTIDE SHOTS TREAT TYPE 2 DIABETES BY INCREASING AN INDIVIDUAL’S  INSULIN LEVELS, ACCORDING TO THE MAYO CLINIC, AND MAY BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

RESEARCHERS FOUND THE MEAN AGE TO BE 50.7 YEARS AND 49.1% WERE WOMEN. THEY ALSO ESTIMATE “THAT MORE THAN 39 MILLION ADULTS QUALIFY FOR INDICATIONS OTHER THAN WEIGHT MANAGEMENT ALONE, A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE OVER THE ESTIMATED 15 MILLION CURRENTLY TAKING” THE MEDICATION.

NEARLY 40 MILLION ADULTS ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE MEDICATION TO TREAT DIABETES OR A SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE.

THE STUDY’S AUTHORS SAY BASED ON THEIR CALCULATIONS NEARLY 4.3 MILLION INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT DIABETES BUT WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE MAY GAIN COVERAGE FOR THE MEDICATION.

THE RESEARCHERS SAY MORE THAN HALF OF US ADULTS WHO HAVE ALREADY TAKEN SEMAGLUTIDE MEDICATION SHARED THAT AFFORDABILITY OF THE MEDICATION IS A BARRIER TO ACCESSING IT AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN INCREASED EFFORT TO PROMOTE EQUITABLE ACCESS FOR PEOPLE WHO NEED THE MEDICATION.

THE MAYO CLINIC LISTS A SLEW OF SIDE EFFECTS OF TAKING SEMAGLUTIDE MEDICATION WHICH CAN INCLUDE: BELCHING, EXCESS AIR OR GAS IN INTESTINES, STOMACH PAIN, BLURRED VISION, CONFUSION, LACK OF APPETITE, NAUSEA, VOMITING AMONG OTHERS.

Business

Biden’s DOJ wants to break up Google, here’s where Trump stands


The U.S. government under President Joe Biden wants to break up Google. But will the same hold true when the White House changes hands in January?

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 44% Center 32% Right 24%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Back in August, a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained a monopoly in internet search. This gave the Department of Justice a major antitrust victory in a case that actually started during the first Trump administration. 

Now, the Biden DOJ says competition cannot be restored unless Google is forced to sell off Chrome, its dominant web browser. Judge Amit Mehta set a two-week hearing on remedies for April 2025, when President-elect Donald Trump will be back in charge of the DOJ.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“The new administration could come forward and say, ‘We mentioned a breakup – we don’t have the enthusiasm for it that we did before. Of course, Judge, if you thought it was appropriate, that’s your call, it’s not ours; you are ultimately the decision maker about remedy. But our view is that it’s no longer required and we’re not asking for it,'” former FTC Chair Bill Kovacic proposed as one possibility in an interview with SAN.

While Trump is no fan of Big Tech or Google, he has so far sidestepped calling for a breakup. In an interview with Bloomberg, Trump said Google was “rigged” but stopped short of saying he’d break them up.

“He said that he might not be fond of a breakup, that Google’s an important company, don’t want to injure them in some way,” Kovacic said.

However, he pointed out that prominent figures in Trump’s campaign, including his running mate, JD Vance, have made comments in support of breaking up Google.

“It seems within the upper echelon of the Trump brain trust that there’s a lot of enthusiasm for going through with the structural remedy,” Kovacic said.

Google said it is appealing the August ruling.

“The DOJ continues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case,” Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland told SAN in a statement. “The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed.” 

“We haven’t had something like this in ages, that is, to have the elaborate discussion of what antitrust law should do after a finding of liability in this kind of setting,” Kovacic said, “Google has the opportunity to come forward and say, ‘You wanted an extraordinary form of intervention. We have something that is much better, equally effective and not as disruptive.’”

In other words, while Google is appealing the monopoly ruling, it can still suggest less extreme remedies as the case proceeds.

The last time antitrust officials tried to break up a Big Tech company of this magnitude was Microsoft in the late ’90s and early 2000s. In the end, through a convoluted appeals process, the DOJ eventually backed off its call to break up Microsoft and settled for a lesser antitrust penalty.

“A big part of the task of the Justice Department in the coming months, if they want a breakup, is to give the judge assurances that it’s worth doing,” Kovacic said. “A number of judges in the past have said, ‘I’m a single unelected official bearing the burden of determining the future of an important sector. That makes me nervous. I’m willing to travel the path that the government suggests, but I want assurances that it is the right path.'”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

[Simone Del Rosario]

It’s official. The U.S. government wants to break up Google. But will the same hold true when the White House changes hands in January?

Back in August, a federal judge ruled Google illegally maintained a monopoly in internet search. This gave the Department of Justice a major antitrust victory in a case that actually started during the first Trump administration. 

Now, the Biden DOJ says competition cannot be restored unless Google is forced to sell off Chrome, its dominant web browser. 

Judge Amit Mehta set a two-week hearing on remedies for April – when President-elect Donald Trump will be back in charge of the DOJ. 

Bill Kovacic: The new administration could come forward and say, ‘We mentioned a breakup. We don’t have the enthusiasm for it that we did before. Of course, Judge, if you thought it was appropriate, that’s your call. It’s not ours. You are ultimately the decision maker about remedy, but our view is that it’s no longer required, and we’re not asking for it.’

Simone Del Rosario: Ok, so that’s a possibility. What has Trump said about it all? While he’s certainly no fan of Big Tech or Google, he has so far sidestepped calling for a breakup. 

Donald Trump: I think Google’s rigged just like our government is rigged all over the place.

Bloomberg EIC: So you would break them up, in other words. 

Donald Trump: I’d do something. You have to have, look, I give them a lot of credit. They’ve become such a power, such a power, and you’ve got to give them credit for that. How they become a power is really the discussion. At the same time, it’s a very dangerous thing because we want to have great companies, we don’t want China to have these companies. 

Bill Kovacic: He said that he might not be fond of a breakup, that Google’s an important company. Don’t want to injure them in some way. I don’t know if that was a well-considered view about remedies, but his nominee to head the Department of Justice, Matt Gaetz, has said, breakup sounds good to me when it comes to this company. And the Vice President-elect Vance has said, breaking them up sounds good to me too. So it seems within the upper echelon of the Trump brain trust that there’s a lot of enthusiasm for going through with the structural remedy.

Simone Del Rosario: Google is appealing the ruling, telling Straight Arrow News, “The DOJ cotinues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case. The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed.” 

Bill Kovacic: We haven’t had something like this in ages, that is, to have the elaborate discussion of what antitrust law should do after a finding of liability in this kind of setting, Google has the opportunity to come forward and say, ‘You wanted an extraordinary form of intervention. We have something that is much better, equally effective and not as disruptive.’

Simone Del Rosario: The last time antitrust officials tried to break up a Big Tech company of this magnitude, it was Microsoft in the late ’90s and early 2000s. In the end, through a convoluted appeals process, the DOJ eventually backed off its call to break up Microsoft and settled for a lesser antitrust penalty. 

Bill Kovacic: A big part of the task of the Justice Department in the coming months, if they want a breakup, is to give the judge assurances that it’s worth doing. A number of judges in the past have said, I’m a single unelected official bearing the burden of determining the future of an important sector that makes me nervous. I’m willing to travel the path that the government suggests, but I want assurances that it is the right path.

Simone Del Rosario: For more on what Google has been accused of and potential fixes that involve Android and more, search “Google Monopoly” for this story with all the Google apps at SAN.com and the Straight Arrow News app. 

Business

News behind paywalls: People reject it, media depend on it in digital shift

Listen
Share

A revolution appears to be unfolding in the news industry, driven by a mix of mistrust, a decline in traditional TV viewership and revenue, and a world increasingly plugged into phones rather than televisions. As a result, news companies are shifting strategies and targeting the digital news consumer.

However, the news business model is still struggling to find a way to generate revenue in this new landscape. Many media groups are transitioning from TV advertising to online paywalls.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

A recent survey found that only 12% of voters have paid to subscribe to at least one news source. Despite this low number of paid subscribers, several prominent news outlets are betting on that figure growing.

CNN made the switch last month, asking users to subscribe after a few free articles.

In its announcement, CNN acknowledged the challenge of shifting from cable TV to digital revenue, noting, “For brands like CNN that make most of their money from cable television, the challenge is clear: to develop new digital revenue streams that can offset declines in legacy TV.”

Reuters followed, activating its paywall last month. The company stated, “This new subscription plan ensures Reuters can expand the reach of its award-winning coverage at an affordable price, while allowing us to further invest in our reporting and products for subscribers.”

Reuters and CNN join a crowded field. A study from the Reuters Institute found 75% of America’s leading newspapers and magazines are behind paywalls. That same report found 30% of all news sites use paywalls.

However, the study also revealed that 80% of Americans aren’t interested in paying for news.

The digital-first approach has been costly for some companies.

This year, the BBC announced it would cut 500 full-time positions. Disney’s ABC TV stations laid off 3% of its news division.

CNN also reduced its workforce by 3%, the LA Times cut 20% of its newsroom and The Associated Press announced an 8% staff reduction.

The AP stated, “Our customers — both who they are and what they need from us — are changing rapidly. This is why we’ve focused on delivering a digital-first news report. We now need to accelerate on this path. Doing so will require making some difficult changes so we can invest more fully in our future.”

Some media analysts suggest the move toward charging consumers for news could also harm the quality of news as people search for trustworthy, free content.

Pollster and Straight Arrow News opinion contributor Frank Luntz posted on X, “Only 12 percent of voters pay for news. Keep this in mind when you’re wondering why misinformation spreads so rapidly, while the articles and posts that debunk it can’t seem to make a dent.”

The Atlantic, a left-leaning news organization, also wrote about the decline of credible news consumption in a world where much of the news is locked behind paywalls. The article, titled “Democracy Dies Behind Paywalls,” was itself behind a paywall.

Claire Wardle is the founder of the nonprofit First Draft, which focuses on misinformation. She told Boston’s NPR station people aren’t paying for news. She also claimed this business model is pushing them further away from traditional news sources.

“When people go and search on Google, they’re just not able to open the link at sites that have fact-checked information,” Wardle said. “There’s now this ‘like what’s the point?’ feeling. So we know that people are turning to one another for information, spending more time on social media platforms where there are other people giving that information for free. They’re spending more time listening to podcasts and relying on these closed sources of people who look like them, sound like them, and give them information that reinforces their worldviews.”

Tags: , , , , ,

[Karah Rucker]

ARE WE SEEING A REVOLUTION TAKE SHAPE IN THE NEWS INDUSTRY?

WITH A MIX OF MIS-TRUST – A DECLINE IN LEGACY TV VIEWERSHIP AND REVENUE –

– ALL IN A WORLD MORE PLUGGED INTO PHONES THAN THE TELEVISION –

NEWS COMPANIES ARE SHIFTING STRATEGY –

TARGETING THE DIGITAL NEWS CONSUMER.

BUT THE NEWS **BUSINESS MODEL – IS STILL FIGURING OUT HOW TO MAKE MONEY –

TRANSITIONING FROM TV ADVERTISING TO ONLINE PAYWALLS.

BUT ARE PEOPLE ACTUALLY SUBSCRIBING?

AND WHERE ARE PEOPLE TURNING IF THEY WANT TO CONSUME NEWS WITHOUT PULLING OUT THEIR WALLET.

ACCORDING TO A NEW SURVEY –

ONLY 12 PERCENT OF VOTERS SAY THEY HAVE PAID TO SUBSCRIBE TO AT LEAST ONE NEWS SOURCE.

DESPITE THIS LOW NUMBER OF PAID SUBSCRIBERS IN THE COUNTRY –

SEVERAL BIG-NAME NEWS OUTLETS ARE TRYING THEIR HAND AT IT –

BANKING ON THAT NUMBER GROWING.

CNN MADE THE SWITCH LAST MONTH –

AFTER A FEW FREE ARTICLES, A USER IS ASKED TO SUBSCRIBE.

{FAST GFX ARTICLE PULL GFX}

IN CNN’S OWN ARTICLE ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT –

THEY WROTE –

“For brands like CNN that make most of their money from cable television, the challenge is clear: to develop new digital revenue streams that can offset declines in legacy TV.”

REUTERS DID THE SAME.

LAST MONTH – ACTIVATING ITS PAYWALL.

SAYING IN ITS ARTICLE –

“This new subscription plan ensures Reuters can expand the reach of its award-winning coverage at an affordable price, while allowing us to further invest in our reporting and products for subscribers.”

THEY JOINED A CROWDED FIELD.

ACCORDING TO A REUTERS INSTITUTE STUDY –

75 PERCENT OF AMERICA’S LEADING NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES ARE BEHIND PAYWALLS.

30 PERCENT OF ALL NEWS SITES USE PAYWALLS.

BUT THAT STUDY ALSO FOUND 80 PERCENT OF AMERICANS ARE UNINTERESTED IN EVER PAYING TO READ THE NEWS.

THE DIGITAL-FIRST MEDIA APPROACH – HAS BEEN COSTLY FOR SOME COMPANIES.

THIS YEAR – THE BBC ANNOUNCED ITS NIXING 500 FULL TIME POSITIONS.

DISNEY’S ABC TV STATIONS LAID OFF 3 PERCENT OF THE NEWS DIVISION.

CNN CUT 3 PERCENT.

THE LA TIMES CUT 20 PERCENT OF ITS NEWSROOM.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS BEING THE MOST RECENT TO ANNOUNCE AN 8 PERCENT STAFF REDUCTION.

THE AP SAID IN A STATEMENT –

Our customers — both who they are and what they need from us — are changing rapidly. This is why we’ve focused on delivering a digital-first news report. We now need to accelerate on this path. Doing so will require making some difficult changes so we can invest more fully in our future.”

SOME media analysts ARE SUGGESTING THE MOVE TO HAVING CONSUMERS PAY FOR NEWS –

WHILE POLLS SUGGEST PEOPLE AREN’T DOING THAT –

COULD ALSO BE SACRIFICING THE QUALITY OF NEWS PEOPLE ARE CONSUMING IN THEIR SEARCH FOR TRUSTWORTHY AND FREE CONTENT.

POLLSTER AND STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS OPINION CONTRIBUTOR FRANK LUNTZ –

POSTED ON X –

“ONLY 12 PERCENT OF VOTERS PAY FOR NEWS. KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU’RE WONDERING WHY MISINFORMATION SPREADS SO RAPIDLY, WHILE THE ARTICLES AND POSTS THAT DEBUNK IT CAN’T SEEM TO MAKE A DENT.”

THE ATLANTIC – A LEFT-LEANING NEWS ORGANIZATION – ALSO WROTE ABOUT THE FALL OF CREDIBLE NEWS CONSUMPTION IN A WORLD WHERE NEWS IS LOCKED BEHIND PAYWALLS. 

BUT IT’S PIECE TITLED “DEMOCRACY DIES BEHIND PAYWALLS” –

WAS BEHIND A PAYWALL.

THE FOUNDER OF A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION “FIRST DRAFT” THAT FOCUSES ON MISINFORMATION –

TOLD BOSTON’S NPR STATION THAT PEOPLE AREN’T PAYING FOR NEWS –

SAYING THIS BUSINESS MODEL – IS LEADING PEOPLE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE INDUSTRY.  

“When people go and search on google, they’re just not able to open the link at sites that have fact-checked information. 

“There’s now this “like what’s the point, ugh, i know what’s going to happen when i click on that link. So we know that people are turning to one another for information, they’re spending more time on social media platforms where there are other people that will give that information for free, they’re spending more time listening to podcasts, and so they’re relying on these closed sources of people who look like them, sound like them, and gives them information that enforces their world views.”

IF YOU’VE MADE IT THIS FAR IN OUR REPORT DISSECTING A TRANSFORMING MEDIA SPACE – THANK YOU FOR WATCHING OUR STORY.

YOU’LL NOTICE WHEREVER YOU FOUND US – WHETHER IT BE ON OUR WEBSITE OR YOUTUBE –

YOU DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY FOR IT.

WHILE OUR INDUSTRY IS NO DOUBT FACING WOES –

WE LOOK AT IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY.

WE’RE ON A MISSION TO PROVE THERE IS STILL MEANINGFUL JOURNALISM OUT THERE.

MANY OF US HERE AT S-A-N INCLUDING MYSELF LEFT LEGACY NEWS TO TRY AND REACH VIEWERS WHO ARE LEAVING TRADITIONAL NEWS TOO.

DO ME A FAVOR SINCE YOU’VE GOTTEN THIS FAR.

TRY OUT OUR MOBILE NEWS APP – IT’S FREE IN YOUR PHONE’S APP STORE.

CHECK OUT MORE OF OUR CONTENT –

BASED ON UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING.

THANKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS MISSION.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M KARAH RUCKER.

 

Politics

Putin signals cease-fire talks with Trump, sets strict conditions

Listen
Share

Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed willingness to discuss a cease-fire in Ukraine with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. However, Putin says this would need to be under specific and stringent conditions.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 21% Center 26% Right 53%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

His proposal includes freezing the conflict along the current front lines, allowing Russia to retain significant territory, including Crimea and large portions of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

These areas account for nearly 20% of Ukraine’s territory, an expanse roughly equivalent to the size of Virginia. The territory also includes critical land routes to Crimea.

Putin ruled out returning Crimea or making any major territorial concessions and insisted Ukraine abandon its ambitions to join NATO.

The Kremlin’s conditions reportedly include limits on Ukraine’s military size and assurances to protect the use of the Russian language. While Moscow is open to offering security guarantees for Ukraine, it insists on the complete absence of NATO forces or influence within the country.

The Kremlin’s stance reflects its broader objective of solidifying territorial gains while countering what it perceives as NATO’s encroachment. Putin has characterized the conflict as a pivotal moment in resisting Western influence in regions Moscow considers part of its sphere of control. However, NATO has emphasized that its members join voluntarily.

Potential negotiations could resemble a 2022 draft agreement discussed during the Istanbul talks. Those talks proposed Ukrainian neutrality in exchange for international security guarantees from U.N. Security Council members.

However, Kyiv remains steadfast in its demand for full territorial sovereignty, including the return of Crimea.

Reports from the front lines indicate that fighting has intensified. Russian forces have made their fastest advances since the early days of the war, further complicating the prospect of a cease-fire. The Kremlin has stated that if no agreement is reached, military operations will continue.

Putin retains decisive control over any potential negotiations, reflecting the centralized decision-making within the Kremlin. While a temporary truce may be achievable, analysts widely agree a comprehensive peace agreement addressing both sides’ security concerns remains unlikely.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

[ryan robertson]

RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN SAYS HE’S OPEN TO DISCUSSING A CEASEFIRE IN UKRAINE WITH PRESIDENT ELECT DONALD TRUMP, BUT ONLY UNDER STRICT CONDITIONS.

PUTIN’S PROPOSAL WOULD FREEZE THE CONFLICT ALONG CURRENT FRONT LINES, ALLOWING RUSSIA TO HOLD ONTO SIGNIFICANT TERRITORY, INCLUDING CRIMEA AND LARGE PARTS OF DONETSK, LUHANSK, ZAPORIZHZHIA, AND KHERSON REGIONS. ALTOGETHER, IT’S AN AREA ABOUT THE SIZE OF VIRGINIA, AND MAKES UP CLOSE TO 20% OF UKRAINE’S TERRITORY. THE AREA ALSO INCLUDES VITAL LAND ROUTES TO CRIMEA. HOWEVER, PUTIN RULED OUT RETURNING CRIMEA OR MAKING MAJOR TERRITORIAL CONCESSIONS. OH, AND HE’S ALSO DEMANDING UKRAINE ABANDON ITS NATO AMBITIONS.

RUSSIA’S TERMS REPORTEDLY INCLUDE LIMITS ON UKRAINE’S MILITARY SIZE AND GUARANTEES TO PROTECT THE USE OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE. WHILE MOSCOW SAYS IT’S WILLING TO OFFER SECURITY GUARANTEES TO UKRAINE, IT INSISTS NATO MUST STAY OUT OF THE COUNTRY ENTIRELY.

THE KREMLIN’S POSITION REFLECTS ITS BROADER GOAL OF SECURING TERRITORIAL GAINS AND COUNTERING WHAT IT SEES AS NATO’S ENCROACHMENT–EVEN THOUGH NATO MEMBERS JOIN THE ALLIANCE VOLUNTARILY. PUTIN FRAMED THE CONFLICT AS A TURNING POINT IN RESISTING WESTERN INFLUENCE IN RUSSIA’S SPHERE OF CONTROL.

THE POTENTIAL TALKS COULD RESEMBLE A 2022 DRAFT AGREEMENT DISCUSSED DURING THE ISTANBUL NEGOTIATIONS. THAT PLAN SUGGESTED UKRAINIAN NEUTRALITY IN EXCHANGE FOR INTERNATIONAL SECURITY GUARANTEES FROM U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. BUT KYIV REMIANS FIRM, DEMANDING FULL TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY, INCLUDING THE RETURN OF CRIMEA.

ALL OF THIS ISN’T HAPPENING IN A VACCUUM. REPORTS FROM THE FRONTLINES SHOW THE FIGHTING IS GROWING MORE INTENSE. RUSSIA ADVANCED MORE RAPIDLY THIS YEAR THAN AT ANY POINT SINCE THE EARLY DAYS OF THE WAR.
THE KREMLIN SAYS IT WILL CONTINUE MILITARY OPERATIONS IF NO CEASEFIRE IS REACHED. WITH PUTIN HOLDING DECISIVE CONTROL OVER ANY NEGOTIATIONS, A TEMPORARY TRUCE MIGHT BE POSSIBLE, HOWEVER MOST ANALYSTS AGREE A LONG-TERM PEACE DEAL REMAINS UNLIKELY.

FOR MORE OF OUR UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING – BE SURE TO DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY, OR LOG ON TO SAN.COM.

International

Australian Parliament considers law banning kids under 16 from social media

Listen
Share

Australia’s communications minister has officially introduced a law that would ban children under 16 from social media. If passed, the law would be the first of its kind in the world.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 43% Center 38% Right 20%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Popular sites like TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram and X could all face fines of up to AU$50 million ($33 million) for failing to prevent young children from having accounts.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The communications minister said government research shows 95% of Australian caregivers say online safety is one of their “toughest parenting challenges.”

When introducing the bill, she also told Parliament almost two-thirds of Australian teens 14 to 17 years old have viewed “extremely harmful content” online, including posts involving drug abuse, suicide or self-harm and violence. She added a quarter have been exposed to content promoting unsafe eating habits.

The bill has wide political support and is expected to become law. Social media companies would have one year to figure out how to implement the age restriction, if passed.

The platforms would also face fines of up to AU$50 million if they misuse the personal information users give them for age verification purposes.

The age restriction law wouldn’t apply to messaging services, online games or platforms that “substantially support the health and education of users.”

A government statement added Australia is looking for ways to prevent children under 18 from accessing online pornography.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

[Karah Rucker]

AUSTRALIA’S COMMUNICATIONS MINISTER HAS OFFICIALLY INTRODUCED A LAW THAT WOULD BAN CHILDREN UNDER 16 FROM SOCIAL MEDIA – THE FIRST OF ITS KIND IN THE *WORLD*.

POPULAR SITES LIKE TIKTOK, FACEBOOK, SNAPCHAT, INSTAGRAM AND X COULD ALL FACE FINES OF UP TO 50 MILLION AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS – OR 33 MILLION U-S DOLLARS – FOR FAILING TO PREVENT YOUNG CHILDREN FROM HAVING ACCOUNTS.

THE COMMUNICATIONS MINISTER SAID GOVERNMENT RESEARCH SHOWS 95 PERCENT OF AUSTRALIAN CARE-GIVERS SAY ONLINE SAFETY IS ONE OF THEIR QUOTE “TOUGHEST PARENTING CHALLENGES.”

WHEN INTRODUCING THE BILL – SHE ALSO TOLD PARLIAMENT ALMOST TWO-THIRDS OF AUSTRALIAN TEENS 14 TO 17 YEARS OLD HAVE VIEWED QUOTE “EXTREMELY HARMFUL CONTENT” ONLINE – INCLUDING POSTS INVOLVING DRUG ABUSE, SUICIDE OR SELF-HARM AND VIOLENCE.

SHE ADDED A QUARTER HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO CONTENT PROMOTING UNSAFE EATING HABITS.

THE BILL HAS WIDE POLITICAL SUPPORT AND IS EXPECTED TO BECOME LAW…

AFTER WHICH SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES WOULD HAVE ONE YEAR TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO IMPLEMENT THE AGE RESTRICTION.

THE PLATFORMS WOULD ALSO FACE FINES OF UP TO 50 MILLION AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS IF THEY MISUSE THE PERSONAL INFORMATION USERS GIVE THEM FOR AGE VERIFICATION PURPOSES.

THE AGE RESTRICTION LAW WOULD *NOT* APPLY TO MESSAGING SERVICES, ONLINE GAMES OR PLATFORMS THAT QUOTE “SUBSTANTIALLY SUPPORT THE HEALTH AND EDUCATION OF USERS.”

A GOVERNMENT STATEMENT ADDED AUSTRALIA IS LOOKING FOR WAYS TO PREVENT CHILDREN UNDER 18 FROM ACCESSING ONLINE PORNOGRAPHY.

STAY UP TO DATE ON ALL YOUR INTERNATIONAL HIGHLINES BY DOWNLOADING THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP NOW.

International

Giraffes may be next on endangered species list as population rapidly declines

Listen
Share

Giraffes could soon be listed on the endangered species list. U.S. wildlife officials say that’s because multiple species of giraffe populations are declining rapidly. 

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 25% Center 50% Right 25%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Researchers point to the loss of habitat, poaching and climate change in their native land in Africa. According to the Giraffe Conservation Foundation about 117,000 wild giraffes are left worldwide – down almost 30% from the 1980s.

The population for the three subspecies of northern giraffe declined from 25,653 to 5,919, a 77% decrease since 1985. Listing many of the species as either endangered or threatened means they would receive federal protections under the Endangered Species Act.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Even though hunting giraffes is illegal in all but three countries in Africa, people still do it for meat and for trophy purposes.

According to the Humane Society of the United States, between 2006 and 2015, trophy hunters imported more than 3,700 giraffes into the U.S. The proposed rule would work toward cutting down illegal hunting and trade of giraffes by requiring a permit to import them into the U.S.

It would also expand funding for research and conservation efforts. A final decision on the endangered status of giraffes will happen in February.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[Jack Aylmer]

GIRAFFES COULD SOON BE LISTED ON THE ENDANGERED SPECIES LIST.

U-S WILDLIFE OFFICIALS SAY THAT’S BECAUSE MULTIPLE SPECIES OF GIRAFFE POPULATIONS ARE DECLINING RAPIDLY. RESEARCHERS POINT TO  THE LOSS OF HABITAT, POACHING AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN THEIR NATIVE LAND IN AFRICA.

THE GIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION SAYS ABOUT 117-THOUSAND WILD GIRAFFES ARE LEFT WORLDWIDE – DOWN ALMOST 30 PERCENT FROM THE 1980S.

THE POPULATION FOR THE THREE SUBSPECIES OF NORTHERN GIRAFFE DECLINED FROM 25-THOUSAND-653 TO 5-THOUSAND-919 – A 77 PERCENT DECREASE SINCE 1985.

LISTING MANY OF THE SPECIES AS EITHER ENDANGERED OR THREATENED MEANS THEY WOULD RECEIVE FEDERAL PROTECTIONS UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.

EVEN THOUGH HUNTING GIRAFFES IS ILLEGAL IN ALL BUT THREE COUNTRIES IN AFRICA – PEOPLE STILL DO IT FOR MEAT AND FOR TROPHY PURPOSES.

ACCORDING TO THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES – BETWEEN 2006 AND 2015, TROPHY HUNTERS IMPORTED MORE THAN 37-HUNDRED GIRAFFE INTO THE U-S.

THE PROPOSED RULE WOULD WORK TOWARD CUTTING DOWN ILLEGAL HUNTING AND TRADE OF GIRAFFES BY REQUIRING A PERMIT TO IMPORT THEM INTO THE U-S.

IT WOULD ALSO EXPAND FUNDING FOR RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION EFFORTS.

A FINAL DECISION ON THE ENDANGERED STATUS OF GIRAFFES WILL HAPPEN IN FEBRUARY.

FOR SAN – I’M JACK AYLMER. 

FOR ALL YOUR LATEST NEWS HEADLINES – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.

U.S.

Winning bidder pays $6.2 million for duct-taped banana artwork

Listen
Share

A duct-taped banana sold for $6.2 million on Wednesday, Nov. 20, in New York City. The work of art by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan is called “Comedian.”

After more than six minutes of bidding at Sotheby’s auction house, the winner was declared. Justin Sun, the Chinese-born founder of the cryptocurrency platform TRON, who watched the auction from Hong Kong, was the work’s new owner.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“Comedian” comes with installation instructions — 14 pages — that double as the certificate of authenticity. It instructs the owner to replace the fruit when needed with a supply of his own and to position the banana so it curves to the right and always displays vertically.

The piece was estimated to fetch between $1 million and $1.5 million, but bidders went far beyond that to be the top banana. Cattelan has said he crafted his work as a satirical jab at market speculation.  

“Comedian” first debuted at a Miami Beach art event in 2019, where the Perrotin Gallery sold three editions for between $120,000 and $150,000 each. However, the work proved “ripe for the taking” for one performance artist, David Datuna, who ripped the banana right off the wall and ate it.

The piece has even caused an uproar in the crypto world. Earlier this month Sotheby’s executive Michael Bouhanna created a memecoin, crypto inspired by online trends or memes, based on Cattelan’s banana called “BAN.” It was direct competition with another “Comedian”-inspired memecoin minted in August called  “BTW,” short for “banana tape wall.”

Sun said he will pay for the work in crypto.  But what did the tycoon find so “appealing” about the duct-taped banana?

In a statement, Sun said the work “represents a cultural phenomenon that bridges the worlds of art, memes, and the cryptocurrency community.”

As for what he’ll do with it, he plans to “personally eat the banana as part of this unique artistic experience, honoring its place in both art history and popular culture.”

Tags: , , , ,

HOW MUCH WOULD YOU PAY FOR A BANANA DUCT-TAPED TO A WALL?

IF YOU SAID MORE THAN SIX POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS THEN YOU SHOULD’VE BEEN AT SOTHEBY’S IN NEW YORK ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT – AND YOU WOULD’VE WON THIS PIECE OF ART THAT HAS MADE COLLECTORS GO BANANAS.

“Fair warning now, to all of our global bidders at 5, 200,000. Here it goes at the end of the global tour, slipping through the auction room, at 5, 200,000, and I’m going to sell it here. Fair warning, at $5, 200,000, Jen, the Cattelan is yours. Congratulations, indeed.

ADD AUCTION HOUSE FEES TO THAT FIVE MILLION TWO AND YOU GET THE SIX POINT TWO MILLION DOLLARS THE PIECE KNOWN AS “COMEDIAN” BY ITALIAN ARTIST MAURIZIO CATTELAN SOLD FOR AT AUCTION AFTER FIVE MINUTES OF BIDDING.

THE WINNER WAS JUSTIN SUN – THE CHINESE-BORN FOUNDER OF THE CRYPTOCURRENCY PLATFORM TRON – WHO WATCHED THE AUCTION FROM HONG KONG.

THE WORK COMES WITH INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS —  14 PAGES THAT ALSO DOUBLE AS THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICY. IT INSTRUCTS THE OWNER TO REPLACE THE FRUIT WHEN NEEDED WITH A SUPPLY OF HIS OWN AND TO POSITION THE BANANA SO IT CURVES TO THE RIGHT – ALWAYS DISPLAYING IT VERTICALLY.

THE PIECE WAS ESTIMATED TO FETCH BETWEEN 1 MILLION DOLLARS AND 1 POINT 5 MILLION DOLLARS – BUT BIDDERS WENT FAR BEYOND THAT TO BE THE TOP BANANA.

CATTELAN HAS SAID HE CRAFTED HIS WORK AS SATIRICAL JAB AT MARKET SPECULATION.

“THE COMEDIAN” FIRST DEBUTED AT A MIAMI BEACH ART EVENT IN 20-19, WHERE THE PERROTIN GALLERY SOLD THREE EDITIONS FOR BETWEEN 120 THOUSAND DOLLAR AND 150 THOUSAND DOLLARS EACH.

BUT THE WORK PROVED “RIPE FOR THE TAKING” FOR ONE PERFORMANCE ARTIST, DAVID DATUNA, WHO RIPPED THE BANANA RIGHT OFF THE WALL AND ATE IT.

THE PIECE HAS EVEN CAUSED AN UPROAR IN THE CRYPTO WORLD – WHEN EARLIER THIS MONTH A SOTHESBY’S EXECUTIVE CREATED A MEMECOIN  – THAT’S CRYPTO INSPIRED BY ONLINE TRENDS OR MEMES – BASED ON CATTELAN’S BANANA CALLED “BAN” – COMPETING WITH ANOTHER COMEDIAN-INSPIRED MEMECOIN MINTED IN AUGUST – THAT ONE’S CALLED B-T-W—SHORT FOR “BANANA TAPE WALL.”

SUN SAID HE WOULD PAY FOR THE WORK IN CRYPTO.

BUT WHAT DID THE TYCOON FIND SO “APPEALING” ABOUT THE DUCT-TAPED BANANA?

IN A STATEMENT SUN SAID THE WORK “REPRESENTS A CULTURAL PHENOMENON THAT BRIDGES THE WORLDS OF ART, MEMES, AND THE CRYPTOCURRENCY COMMUNITY.”

AS FOR WHAT HE’LL DO WITH IT – HE PLANS TO QUOTE “PERSONALLY EAT THE BANANA AS PART OF THIS UNIQUE ARTISTIC EXPERIENCE,  HONORING ITS PLACE IN BOTH ART HISTORY AND POPULAR CULTURE.”

ART TRULY BEING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER. AND IN THIS CASE THE BEHOLDER OF A 6 POINT 2 MILLION DOLLAR BANANA.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M CRAIG NIGRELLI.

FOR MORE OF OUR STORIES DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP.

Energy

Michigan communities push back against renewable energy permitting process

Listen
Share

Nearly 80 municipalities across Michigan have filed a legal challenge against the state’s permitting process for large-scale solar and wind energy facilities. The appeal claims that the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) overstepped its legislative authority, prompting a debate over the balance of power between state and local governments in renewable energy development.

At the heart of the dispute is the MPSC’s interpretation of a series of bills that were signed into law in 2023 by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. The legislation was designed to create a cooperative framework between the state and local governments regarding renewable energy project approvals. The MPSC established zoning standards for wind and solar facilities, while leaving site-specific decisions to local authorities.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

However, municipal officials argue that the MPSC has unlawfully expanded its role, redefining key terms and adopting policies that strip local governments of their ability to determine where such facilities can be placed within their jurisdictions. Lawyers at the firm representing the municipalities claim that the MPSC’s approach has led to inconsistent interpretations of the law, asserting that the commission’s actions takes away the local communities’ right to even say where in the township a wind or solar energy facility can be placed.

One official from a community involved in this litigation, Jeff Sorensen, a Cooper Township supervisor, said they are bringing the appeal forward, not because these towns, cities, villages and counties are against renewable energy, but rather because they believe these renewable energy decisions should be kept at a local level.

“Basically what it has done, it has taken away local control for townships, cities and villages,” Sorensen said. “We all have different needs. Some people may welcome a whole township-wide worth of renewable energy, and it may be good for them, but others may not.”

The MPSC has yet to respond publicly to the appeal. However, the commission is set to hold a scheduled meeting Thursday, Nov. 21, will include a public comment session, providing an opportunity for community members to voice their concerns.

Tags: , , , , , ,

COMMUNITIES IN MICHIGAN ARE PUSHING BACK AGAINST RENEWABLE ENERGY.

 

NEARLY 80 MUNICIPALITIES IN THE STATE HAVE FILED A LEGAL CHALLENGE AGAINST MICHIGAN’S PERMITTING PROCESS FOR LARGE-SCALE SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY FACILITIES.

 

THEY ARGUE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION EXCEEDED THE POWERS GRANTED TO IT BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE-

UNLAWFULLY REDEFINING TERMS ASSOCIATED WITH HOW PERMITS ARE ISSUED FOR THESE TYPES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS.

 

DOING SO IN WAYS THAT GIVE MORE AUTHORITY TO THE COMMISSION, WHILE TAKING POWER AWAY FROM LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

 

THIS DEBATE COMES AFTER A SERIES OF BILLS SIGNED IN 20-23 BY MICHIGAN GOVERNOR GRETCHEN WHITMER.

 

THE LEGISLATION WAS INTENDED TO BE A WAY FOR THE STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO GET ON THE SAME PAGE WHEN IT CAME TO SOME SPECIFICS RELATED TO THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS.

 

THE COMMISSION WAS ABLE TO REVIEW WIND AND SOLAR DEVELOPMENT AND SET STANDARDS ON VARIOUS ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE FACILITIES.

 

THEN EVERYTHING ELSE WAS GOING TO BE LEFT FOR THE COMMUNITIES TO DECIDE.

 

HOWEVER, LAWYERS FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES FILING SUIT SAY WHAT HAS NOW HAPPENED IS A MATTER OF INCONSISTENT INTERPRETATIONS.

 

CLAIMING THE COMMISSION IS ADOPTING A POLICY THAT TAKES AWAY THE LOCAL COMMUNITIES’ RIGHT TO EVEN SAY WHERE IN THE TOWNSHIP A WIND OR SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY CAN BE PLACED.

 

ONE OFFICIAL FROM A COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN THIS LITIGATION SAYS ITS NOT ABOUT THESE TOWNS, CITIES, VILLAGES AND COUNTIES BEING AGAINST RENEWABLE ENERGY.

 

BUT RATHER THIS FIGHT IS ABOUT KEEPING THOSE DECISIONS AT A LOCAL LEVEL.

 

MEANWHILE, THE COMMISSION HAS YET TO ISSUE A STATEMENT ON THE MATTER-

BUT WILL HOLD A MEETING THIS WEEK WHERE PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD.

 

TO GET MORE STORIES ABOUT DEBATES OVER RENEWABLE ENERGY, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP AND SIGN UP FOR ALERTS FROM ME- JACK AYLMER.

Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share
Politics

Gaetz withdraws name from attorney general consideration

Listen
Share
Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share

Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general, withdrew his name from consideration on Thursday, Nov. 21. The former Florida congressman said his nomination had “unfairly” become a distraction to Trump’s transition.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 26% Center 46% Right 28%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“There is no time to waste on a needlessly protracted Washington scuffle, thus I’ll be withdrawing my name from consideration to serve as Attorney General,” Gaetz wrote on X. “Trump’s DOJ must be in place and ready on Day 1.”

Gaetz added that he was “fully committed” to Trump’s presidency.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

In response, Trump posted to Truth Social, “I greatly appreciate the recent efforts of Matt Gaetz in seeking approval to be Attorney General. He was doing very well but, at the same time, did not want to be a distraction for the Administration, for which he has much respect. Matt has a wonderful future, and I look forward to watching all of the great things he will do!”

The announcement comes after Gaetz and Vice President-elect JD Vance spent Wednesday, Nov. 20, on Capitol Hill meeting with senators. He could only spare three Republican votes to be confirmed, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, had already said she was a no, while others expressed reservations.

Gaetz’s nomination had been dogged by controversy due to investigations by the Department of Justice and the House Ethics Committee. The allegations against Gaetz included sexual misconduct, illicit drug use, converting campaign funds for personal use and accepting a bribe. 

The DOJ decided not to charge the former congressman with a crime. The House Ethics Committee was still considering whether to release its report.

While lawmakers from both parties said they would need to see the report before voting to confirm Gaetz, as of Wednesday, Republicans had temporarily rejected releasing it.

The document represents the culmination of a three-year investigation and could shed more details on allegations that Gaetz did hard drugs and had sex with a minor while a member of Congress. 

Tags: , ,

[RAY BOGAN]

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz is out as Attorney General nominee. Gaetz announced he was withdrawing because he felt his confirmation was unfairly becoming a distraction to the Trump transition. 

Gaetz posted online – “There is no time to waste on a needlessly protracted Washington scuffle…” “Trump’s DOJ must be in place and ready on Day 1.”

President-elect Trump posted: “He was doing very well but, at the same time, did not want to be a distraction for the Administration, for which he has much respect. Matt has a wonderful future…” 

Gaetz said he remained fully committed to Trump. 

The announcement came a day after Gaetz was on Capitol Hill meeting with Senators. He could only lose three Republican votes to be confirmed. Senator Lisa Murkowski already said she was a no, others had expressed serious reservations. 

Gaetz’s nomination was surrounded by controversy due to investigations by the Department of Justice and the House Ethics Committee. The allegations against Gaetz included sexual misconduct, illicit drug use, converting campaign funds for personal use and accepting a bribe. 

The DOJ decided not to charge the former congressman with a crime. 

The House Ethics Committee was still considering whether to release their report. 

There was bipartisan agreement that Senators would need to see the report before they could vote to confirm him. The document would have been the culmination of a three year investigation and could have shed more details on allegations that Gaetz did hard drugs and had sex with a minor while a member of Congress.