[KARAH RUCKER]
ANOTHER REMINDER TO READ THE FINE PRINT…
A COURT IS BLOCKING A NEW JERSEY COUPLE FROM SUING UBER AFTER A BAD CRASH LEFT THEM WITH BROKEN BONES AND HEFTY MEDICAL BILLS.
WHY?
BECAUSE THEY ACCEPTED THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS BEFORE TAKING THE RIDE, WHICH REQUIRES ANY COMPLAINT TO BE HANDLED OUTSIDE OF COURT.
THE PAIR TRIED TO TAKE UBER TO COURT FOR A JURY TRIAL AFTER THEIR UBER DRIVER RAN A RED LIGHT AND GOT PLOWED INTO BY ANOTHER CAR IN 2022.
BUT THE APPEALS COURT SIDED WITH THE RIDESHARE GIANT.
THE COUPLE CONTENDED IT WAS THEIR UNDERAGED DAUGHTER WHO CLICKED THE MOST RECENT AGREEMENT WITH UBER EATS IN 2022 WHILE ORDERING A PIZZA– SO, THE CASE SHOULD MOVE FORWARD.
UBER FOUGHT BACK ARGUING IT WASN’T THEIR DAUGHTER WHO SIGNED AGREEMENTS IN 2015 AND 2021… BOTH OF WHICH WAIVED THE COUPLE’S RIGHT TO A COURT TRIAL WITH ARBITRATION CLAUSES.
IT DIDN’T HELP THE COUPLE’S CASE DURING THEIR COURT APPEARANCE WHEN THEY COULDN’T “SURMISE” WHETHER OR NOT THEIR DAUGHTER ACTUALLY CLICKED THE BUTTON.
THE HUSBAND AND WIFE NOW SAY THEY’RE “HEARTBROKEN” …
AND WILL TRY TO BRING THEIR CASE TO THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.
THE LAWSUIT DEMANDED UBER PAY FOR PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL AND FINANCIAL DAMAGES THE CRASH CAUSED THEM.
IT’S PROBABLY NOT THE FIRST TIME YOU’VE HEARD OF THIS HAPPENING.
IN AUGUST, DISNEY USED A SIMILAR DEFENSE BUT REVERSED COURSE ON A DISPUTE OVER TERMS OF SERVICE IN A WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT.
THE CASE WAS BROUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY BY A MAN WHOSE WIFE DIED AFTER AN ALLERGIC REACTION AT A DISNEY RESORT RESTAURANT.
DISNEY TRIED TO GET THE LAWSUIT TOSSED BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFF SIGNED UP FOR A DISNEY-PLUS TRIAL YEARS EARLIER.
AFTER BACKLASH, DISNEY SAID THE CASE COULD MOVE FORWARD IN COURT.
FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KARAH RUCKER.