data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500c8/500c86c5081d9e67683f152841c18350fd1ba29f" alt="Utah is set to become the first state to ban fluoride in public water systems, with a bill on the matter awaiting the governor’s approval."
Utah set to become first state to ban fluoride in public water systems
By Jack Aylmer (Energy Correspondent), Michael Edwards (Video Editor), Ali Caldwell (Motion Graphic Designer)
- Utah is set to become the first state to ban fluoride in public water systems. A bill removing local decision-making on fluoridation has been passed by the state’s legislature and awaits Republican Gov. Spencer Cox’s approval.
- Supporters argue that the measure promotes individual choice and reduces costs, while opponents say fluoridation is a cost-effective way to prevent tooth decay, especially for lower-income residents.
- Utah ranks 44th in the U.S. for fluoridated water access, with only 40% of residents served by community water systems receiving fluoridation.
Full Story
Utah is poised to become the first state in the U.S. to enact a full ban on fluoride in public water systems. The bill would remove the decision-making power on fluoridation from cities and communities, and has passed the state legislature. The only thing left for the bill is approval from Republican Gov. Spencer Cox.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 8% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Utah is close to fully banning fluoride in public water systems, meaning cities cannot decide on its use.
- The bill has passed the legislature and awaits approval from Republican Gov. Spencer Cox.
- Proponents argue that including fluoride in water is too costly, while opponents emphasize its health benefits for preventing tooth decay.
- Fluoridation is deemed essential by some health advocates for low-income communities.
- Utah is poised to become the first state to fully ban fluoride in public water systems, preventing local governments from deciding on fluoride addition.
- The bill has passed the legislature and is awaiting approval from Governor Spencer Cox after clearing its final hurdle.
- In 2023, voters in Brigham City rejected a proposal to remove fluoride from its water supplies by a margin of more than two-to-one.
- Supporters of the bill argue that adding fluoride is too costly, while some health advocates claim it helps prevent tooth decay and cavities.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
What are health officials saying about fluoride?
The bill comes amid a broader national debate over water fluoridation. Newly appointed federal Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has voiced opposition to the practice, referring to fluoride as “an industrial waste,” and claiming it is linked to cancer, diseases and other disorders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e297/5e297bcdb16b0093ed78352ff46fadc4a3429dc9" alt="QR code for SAN app download"
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Meanwhile, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considers fluoridation one of the most significant public health achievements of the 20th century. According to the CDC, fluoride strengthens teeth and helps reduce cavities by restoring minerals lost during daily wear.
How is Utah’s potential fluoride ban being received?
Supporters of the bill argue that while fluoride offers some benefits, the cost of fluoridation is too high. They also emphasize that the measure is not anti-fluoride but rather an effort to promote informed consent and individual choice.
Opponents, including public health advocates, argue that fluoridation is the most cost-effective method of preventing tooth decay on a large scale. They note that for some residents, particularly those with lower incomes, fluoridated water is the only form of preventive dental care available.
How much does fluoridation cost?
The CDC estimates that fluoridation costs an average of 31 cents per person annually in communities with populations over 50,000. In Salt Lake City, which is home to around 212,570 residents, the annual cost is about $66,000.
However, costs are higher for smaller communities, with populations under 10,000 paying up to $2.12 per person annually. For Park City, which has about 8,254 residents, the yearly cost is nearly $17,500.
How does Utah’s fluoride use compare to other states?
In 2022, CDC data ranked Utah 44th in the nation for the percentage of residents receiving fluoridated water. Approximately 40% of Utah residents served by community water systems have access to fluoridated water. In 2024, out of 484 Utah water systems reporting data to the CDC, only 66 added fluoride to their water.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What happens next?
Currently, nearly two-thirds of the U.S. population consumes fluoridated water. Across the country, some cities have opted to remove this fluoride, with other municipalities considering similar measures.
[Jack Aylmer]
UTAH IS POISED TO BECOME THE FIRST STATE TO ENACT A FULL BAN ON FLUORIDE IN PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS.
A BILL THAT WOULD REMOVE THE DECISION-MAKING POWER ON THIS MATTER FROM CITIES AND COMMUNITIES HAS PASSED THE STATE LEGISLATURE-
AND NOW AWAITS APPROVAL FROM GOVERNOR SPENCER COX.
THE MOVE COMES AS NEWLY APPOINTED FEDERAL HEALTH SECRETARY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. HAS VOICED SKEPTICISM ABOUT WATER FLUORIDATION
WHICH CONVERSLY THE CDC CONSIDERS ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC HEALTH ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE 20TH CENTURY.
THE AGENCY SAYING FLUORIDE HELPS STRENGTHEN TEETH AND REDUCES CAVITIES BY RESTORING MINERALS LOST DURING DAILY WEAR.
SUPPORTERS OF THE BILL ARGUE THAT WHILE FLUORIDE IN PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS CAN OFFER SOME BENEFITS-
IT’S TOO COSTLY.
ADDING THAT THEY DON’T SEE THIS AS ANTI-FLUORIDE LEGISLATION, BUT RATHER A MEASURE AIMED AT PROMOTING INFORMED CONSENT AND INDIVIDUAL CHOICE.
MEANWHILE, OPPONENTS CONTEND FLUORIDATION REMAINS THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE METHOD OF PREVENTING TOOTH DECAY ON A LARGE SCALE.
WITH SOME PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES SAYING FLUORIDATED PUBLIC WATER IS OFTEN THE ONLY FORM OF PREVENTIVE DENTAL CARE AVAILABLE TO SOME RESIDENTS, PARTICULARLY THOSE WITH LOWER INCOMES.
ACCORDING TO THE CDC, THE ANNUAL AVERAGE PRICE OF FLUORIDATION IN A CITY IS AROUND 31 CENTS PER PERSON FOR COMMUNITIES WITH A POPULATION OVER 50,000.
SO FLUORIDATING THE WATER OF THE MORE THAN 200,000 RESIDENTS IN UTAH’S CAPITAL, SALT LAKE CITY, COSTS ABOUT 66,000 DOLLARS EVERY YEAR.
HOWEVER, SMALLER COMMUNITIES ACTUALLY HAVE TO PAY A LOT MORE, REACHING UP TO $2.12 PER PERSON ANNUALLY FOR POPULATIONS UNDER 10,000 PEOPLE.
MEANING, FLUORIDATING THE WATER FOR PARK CITY’S OVER 8,000 RESIDENTS COMES AT A YEARLY TOTAL OF ALMOST 17,500 DOLLARS.
2022 DATA FROM THE CDC FOUND UTAH RANKED 44TH IN THE NATION FOR THE PERCENTAGE OF RESIDENTS RECEIVING FLUORIDE IN THEIR WATER-
WITH ABOUT 40% OF THE STATE’S RESIDENTS SERVED BY COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS HAVING ACCESS TO FLUORIDATED WATER.
OUT OF THE 484 UTAH WATER SYSTEMS REPORTING DATA TO THE CDC IN 2024, ONLY 66 ADDED FLUORIDE TO THEIR WATER.
RIGHT NOW, NEARLY TWO-THIRDS OF THE U.S. POPULATION CONSUMES FLUORIDATED WATER.
BUT ACROSS THE COUNTRY, SOME CITIES HAVE OPTED TO REMOVE FLUORIDE FROM THEIR WATER, AND OTHER MUNICIPALITIES ARE WEIGHING SIMILAR MEASURES.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M JACK AYLMER.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 8% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Utah is close to fully banning fluoride in public water systems, meaning cities cannot decide on its use.
- The bill has passed the legislature and awaits approval from Republican Gov. Spencer Cox.
- Proponents argue that including fluoride in water is too costly, while opponents emphasize its health benefits for preventing tooth decay.
- Fluoridation is deemed essential by some health advocates for low-income communities.
- Utah is poised to become the first state to fully ban fluoride in public water systems, preventing local governments from deciding on fluoride addition.
- The bill has passed the legislature and is awaiting approval from Governor Spencer Cox after clearing its final hurdle.
- In 2023, voters in Brigham City rejected a proposal to remove fluoride from its water supplies by a margin of more than two-to-one.
- Supporters of the bill argue that adding fluoride is too costly, while some health advocates claim it helps prevent tooth decay and cavities.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
GOP leaders call on AG Pam Bondi to release Epstein documents after promise
Watch 2:003 hrs ago -
Getty Images
DHS shuts down CBP One app for immigrant entry, now used to self deport
Watch 1:426 hrs ago -
Getty Images
DeSantis backs getting rid of Florida’s property tax. What would that look like?
Watch 3:268 hrs ago -
CBS Photo Archive/Getty
‘Indefensible’: Rachel Maddow condemns MSNBC’s removal of non-white hosts
Watch 4:149 hrs ago