Skip to main content
U.S. Elections

WaPo calls Pa. Democrats’ push to count invalid ballots undemocratic


Tensions are rising in Pennsylvania’s Senate race, where some Democratic election officials are defying recent court rulings on counting ballots after The Associated Press called the race for Republican Dave McCormick. However, some efforts to defy court orders to count certain ballots are being viewed as undemocratic, according to The Washington Post editorial board.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 21% Center 32% Right 48%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Before the election, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruled provisional ballots were required to be signed in two places and mail-in ballots were to be dated. However, Democratic leaders in several counties are challenging those mandates.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The AP reported four counties voted to count mail-in ballots that were in question.

Lawyers for Sen. Bob Casey, D-Penn., requested the action. Casey is trailing McCormick by about 24,000 votes.

Nearly all of the 7 million ballots cast have already been counted. Casey is allowed to request a recount due to the narrow margin.

The issue of counting mail-in and provisional ballots has been contentious in Pennsylvania. Lower courts have already litigated the issue and the state’s Supreme Court ruled it’s illegal to count ballots missing required signatures and dates for the 2024 election.

“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia said. “People violate laws anytime they want. So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention.”

Local Democratic officials argue the court got it wrong and is invalidating votes over clerical errors. Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court is made up of five Democratic justices and two Republicans.

“The mere attempt to defy judicial rulings is corrosive to democracy and invites similar behavior in future elections,” The Post’s editorial board wrote.

“Democrats would surely protest if a Republican commissioner made the same statement to justify tipping the scales for their party’s Senate nominee—and they would be right. Elections need rules, established in advance of the voting, and those rules must be applied equally and consistently,” the board added.

While most election results this cycle have been accepted, three candidates have yet to concede, including Casey in Pennsylvania, Republican Senate candidate Kari Lake in Arizona and Republican Senate candidate Eric Hovde in Wisconsin.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

[Karah]

Tensions are rising in A Pennsylvania SENATE RACE, where some Democratic ELECTION OFFICIALS IN PHILADELPHIA AND THREE OTHER COUNTIES are openly defying recent court rulings on COUNTING BALLOTS.

ONE COUNTY official saying in a commissioners meeting “PRECEDENT BY A COURT DOESN’T MATTER ANYMORE.”

A CLOSE SENATE RACE HAS BEEN CALLED BY THE A-P – IN FAVOR OF REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER DAVE MCCORMICK OVER INCUMBENT SENATOR BOB CASEY.

BUT SOME EFFORTS TO DEFY COURT ORDERS TO COUNT CERTAIN BALLOTS ARE LOOKING LIKE AN **ANTI-DEMOCRATIC PROCESS ACCORDING TO THE WASHINGTON POST’S EDITORIAL BOARD.

Despite a ruling from Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ahead of the November 5 election, which required that provisional ballots be signed in two places and that mail-in ballots must be dated, Democratic leaders in several counties are challenging those mandates.

THE AP REPORTED FOUR COUNTIES AS HAVING VOTED TO COUNT MAIL-IN BALLOTS IN QUESTION.

lawyers for Democratic Senator Bob Casey, who’s trailing McCormick by about 24,000 votes, called for the action. 

Nearly all of the 7 million ballots cast have already been counted.

Casey, however, is entitled to request a recount due to the narrow margin.

“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country. People violate laws anytime they want. So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention.”

THE ISSUE OVER COUNTING MAIL-IN BALLOTS AND PROVISIONAL BALLOTS HAS BEEN A CONTENTIOUS ONE.

IT’S GONE THROUGH MULTIPLE LOWER COURTS IN THE STATE – WITH THE STATE SUPREME COURT RULING IT  ILLEGAL TO COUNT BALLOTS LACKING THE FORMALLY REQUIRED SIGNATURES AND DATES FOR THE 2024 ELECTION.

THE STATE SUPREME COURT IS MADE UP OF 5 DEMOCRATS AND 2 REPUBLICANS.

LOCAL DEMOCRAT OFFICIALS SAY THE BENCH GOT IT WRONG –

AND IS INVALIDATING VOTES OVER CLERICAL ERRORS.

THE POST’S EDITORIAL BOARD WROTE –

“the mere attempt to defy judicial rulings is corrosive to democracy and invites similar behavior in future elections.”

“Democrats would surely protest if a Republican commissioner made the same statement to justify tipping the scales for their party’s Senate nominee — and they would be right. Elections need rules, established in advance of the voting, and those rules must be applied equally and consistently.”

WHOLE MOST RESULTS THIS ELECTION CYCLE WERE ACCEPTED –

THREE CANDIDATES HAVE NOT YET CONCEDED DESPITE RACES CALLED.

THAT INCLUDES CASEY IN THIS PENNSYLVANIA RACE.

REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE KARI LAKE IN ARIZONA.

AND REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE ERIC HOVDE IN WISCONSIN.