Skip to main content
Politics

WaPo, LA Times’ endorsement decisions lead to resignations


The decision by The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times not to publish endorsements of a presidential candidate has led to resignations. The Washington Post announced Friday, Oct. 25, for the first time in more than 30 years, the paper would not make an endorsement this year or for any future presidential election.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 40% Center 20% Right 40%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility,” Publisher William Lewis wrote. “That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“We see it as consistent with the values the post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects,” Lewis continued.

Lewis added this move stood as a statement of the Post readers’ ability to make up their minds.

According to The Washington Post’s reporting on the development, the paper’s editorial staff had drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, but it had yet to be published. The post, citing sources, reported it was the paper’s owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who called for an end to endorsements.

In response to the decision, longtime columnist and editor-at-large in the opinions department Robert Kagan and contributing editor and former NPR anchor Michele Norris resigned, subscribers posted on social media screenshots of their cancellation confirmations and 20 opinion columnists wrote an article saying the decision was a “terrible mistake.”

The Washington Post’s move came on the heels of the Los Angeles Times forgoing an endorsement from its editorial board earlier in the week. Times publisher Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked the board’s planned endorsement of Harris for president.

The editorial page director Mariel Garza and two veteran journalists, Robert Greene and Karin Klein, resigned in protest.

Soon-Shiong posted an explanation on X.

“The editorial board was provided the opportunity to draft a factual analysis of all the positive and negative policies by each candidate during their tenures at the White House, and how these policies affected the nation,” Soon-Shiong wrote. “Instead of adopting this path as suggested, the editorial board chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision.”

“I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not OK with us being silent,” Garza told the Columbia Journal Review. “In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.”

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign looked to capitalize on the move from the Los Angeles Times’ owner, sending out a statement.

“In Kamala’s own home state, the Los Angeles Times —the state’s largest newspaper —has declined to endorse the Harris-Walz ticket…even her fellow Californians know she’s not up for the job,” the statement said.

Greene and Klein, in separate instances, replied to Soon-Shiong’s suggestion of creating a list of pros and cons. They both said such reporting would fall under the news department, which operates separately from the editorial board in a newsroom.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

ON OCTOBER 11TH 1860 –  READERS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES FOUND THIS PASSAGE IN THEIR PAPER:

“A MR. LINCOLN, OF ILLINOIS, FAMILIARLY KNOWN AS ‘OLD ABE,’ AGE 51, HEIGHT SIX FEET SEVEN, BY PROFESSION, RAIL-SPLITTER, IS TO BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. THE THING SEEMS PRETTY SURE.”

THIS WAS THE NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD’S BACKING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ABRAHAM LINCOLN. LESS THAN A MONTH LATER – LINCOLN WOULD BE ELECTED THE 16TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

THE 1860 ENDORSEMENT WAS ONE OF THE EARLIEST FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD.

IN SEPTEMBER —  THE BOARD PUBLISHED ITS LATEST – ENDORSING DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT.

THE IMPACT OF A NEWSPAPER’S ENDORSEMENT ON AN ELECTION HAS BEEN ANALYZED FOR DECADES –

A STUDY PUBLISHED IN THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN 1976  LOOKED AT THE ELECTION OF 1964 – WHERE THE WINNER WAS LYNDON B. JOHNSON  – WHO WAS THE CHOICE OF THE TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD THAT YEAR. THE RESEARCHERS CAME TO THIS CONCLUSION, QUOTE: “IT IS ARGUED THAT NEWSPAPER ENDORSEMENTS EXERT AN IMPORTANT INFLUENCE ON THE OUTCOMES OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS.”

BUT THE TRADITION OF NEWSPAPER EDITORIAL BOARDS ENDORSING THEIR FAVORITE CANDIDATE CAME OUT OF FAVOR LAST WEEK FOR AT LEAST TWO RENOWNED PUBLICATIONS.

THE WASHINGTON POST ANNOUNCED FRIDAY – FOR THE FIRST TIME IN MORE THAN 30 YEARS – THE PAPER WOULD NOT MAKE AN ENDORSEMENT FOR ANY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE THIS YEAR OR FOR ANY FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

PUBLISHER WILLIAM LEWIS WRITING “We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way.

We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”

LEWIS ADDS THIS MOVE STANDS AS A STATEMENT OF THE THE POST READERS’ ABILITY TO MAKE UP THEIR OWN MINDS.

ACCORDING TO THE WASHINGTON POST’S OWN REPORTING ON THIS DEVELOPMENT – THE PAPER’S EDITORIAL STAFF HAD DRAFTED AN ENDORSEMENT OF VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS – BUT IT HAD YET TO BE PUBLISHED.

THE POST — CITING SOURCES — REPORTS – IT WAS THE PAPER’S OWNER – AMAZON FOUNDER JEFF BEZOS – WHO CALLED FOR AN END TO ENDORSEMENTS

IN RESPONSE TO THE DECISION – TWO POST EMPLOYEES RESIGNED – SUBSCRIBERS POSTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA SCREENSHOTS OF THEIR CANCELLATION CONFIRMATIONS – AND 20 OPINION COLUMNISTS WROTE AN ARTICLE SAYING THE DECISION WAS A QUOTE “TERRIBLE MISTAKE.”

THE WASHINGTON POST’S MOVE CAME ON THE HEELS OF THE LOS ANGELES TIMES FORGOING AN ENDORSEMENT FROM ITS EDITORIAL BOARD EARLIER IN THE WEEK.

TIMES PUBLISHER PATRICK SOON-SHIONG BLOCKED THE BOARD’S PLANNED ENDORSEMENT OF HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT.

THE EDITORIAL PAGE DIRECTOR MARIEL GARZA AND TWO VETERAN JOURNALISTS — ROBERT GREENE AND KARIN KLEIN — RESIGNED IN PROTEST.

SOON-SHIONG POSTED THIS EXPLANATION ON X  – SAYING “The Editorial Board was provided the opportunity to draft a factual analysis of all the POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE policies by EACH candidate during their tenures at the White House, and how these policies affected the nation….Instead of adopting this path as suggested, the Editorial Board chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision.”

IN SPEAKING WITH THE COLUMBIA JOURNAL REVIEW, GARZA SAID QUOTE “I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not OK with us being silent. In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.”

FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN LOOKED TO CAPITALIZE ON THE MOVE FROM THE LOS ANGELES TIMES’ OWNER – IN AN EMAIL SAYING

“In Kamala’s own home state, the Los Angeles Times—the state’s largest newspaper—has declined to endorse the Harris-Walz ticket…Even her fellow Californians know she’s not up for the job.”

RESPONDING TO THE LA TIMES OWNER – GREENE AND KLEIN, THE PAPER’S TWO VETERAN JOURNALISTS WHO RESIGNED, REPLIED THAT CREATING THAT SUGGESTED LIST OF PROS AND CONS WOULD FALL UNDER THE NEWS DEPARTMENT – WHICH IN A NEWSROOM OPERATES SEPARATELY FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M CRAIG NIGRELLI.

FOR MORE OF OUR ELECTION COVERAGE DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP.