Peter Zeihan Geopolitical Strategist
Share
Commentary

Ethnic strife and civil war mark Myanmar’s bleak future

Share
Peter Zeihan Geopolitical Strategist
Share

The civil war in Myanmar formally began in the spring of 2021, but experts have argued that it is just a new chapter in one of the world’s oldest and most brutal conflicts, dating back over 75 years. Decades of fighting have displaced millions, destroyed opportunities for work, ruined the education system and fueled a flourishing drug trade.

Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan discusses the reasons for the civil war in Myanmar and potential resolutions.


Be the first to know when Peter Zeihan publishes a new commentary! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!


Excerpted from Peter’s Aug. 14 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

Myanmar doesn’t often catch my attention, but with the ongoing civil war, I figured it was time to throw it into the mix. After years of civil unrest, is there a clear path to stability?

A quick look back at Myanmar’s history will show a fractured population divided by demography and ethnic lines. The majority is made up of the Burmese people, which comprises two-thirds of the population. The Burmese live in the most favorable location and have the best infrastructure.

The Burman majority currently also makes up the vast majority of the military, which is the backbone of the ruling junta. In addition to stymying domestic democracy movements and mismanaging the country (and its resources, and its economy), the pro-Burman regime has a long history of abuses against various minority groups. These groups have increased their violent confrontation with the junta in recent years, and the military has struggled to retain control.

So, after 15 years of civil unrest and conflict, can they see the light on the other side? Unfortunately, the future remains bleak until there is some form of political resolution to regain control of the country and the disconnected population.

[PETER ZEIHAN]

Everybody. Peter Zein here coming to you from Colorado, we are in the first full week of August, August, and today we’re talking about a place called Myanmar. We’ve had a lot of military activity there. In the region. There’s basically a civil war going on, and the Rebels have captured a major military facility in one of the regional capitals. First of all, what is a Myanmar? Myanmar is a country that used to be called Burma that is sandwiched between the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia. It’s primarily mountainous, primarily jungle, but cutting through the middle of it is the Irrawaddy River, which is actually a navigable river way like the Mississippi or the Rhine. And so is a huge push for commerce right there. The population, of course, as you would expect from jungles and mountains, is fractured. The core population, the Burman, or the Burmese, based on what your ethnicity is, runs right along the river, right in the lowlands, the most viable area, the most economically viable area where most activity happens, where most agriculture happens. They’re about two thirds of the population, and they are large and in charge. They have also had a secession, a succession of governments under military and civilian rules that are kind of pricks and treat everyone else as disposable. Before you even consider that mountainous people and jungle living people are a little ornery. There’s plenty of reasons for all the other ethnicities in Myanmar slash Burma to be aggroed with the burmans. And so we basically had been in an increasing state of civil breakdown in now Civil War for the last 15 years. And there are over 100 other ethnicities. None of them make up more than 10% of the population, but all of them have their little areas that they’ve carved out, big into smuggling, big into heroin, because these are things that you can do when the center cannot hold I phrased that wrong. The Center can hold the center can hold the center, but it has a real hard time pushing power into the provinces and to the edges of everybody else. The problem is, is that all the borders are porous. The development is limited, and what infrastructure you have is largely limited to the Burman areas in that low lens around the Irrawaddy this, unfortunately, is becoming the new state of affairs. The burmans have mismanaged their affairs under civilian and military rule. It’s currently military rule to the point that relations with pretty much all of the ethnicities have broken down. And while there’s a civil war, on one hand, there is also because of military rule, a pro democracy push across the country that is weakening the government from within. So if the center holds but nothing else, you’re basically looking at this giant view of territory in the northwest and East becoming stateless in the traditional sense, this is how it’s going to remain until such time as someone is able to consolidate power. That could be a change of government among the burmans, who can maybe do some sort of national reconciliation. But I don’t see anyone alive, and the political system right now is capable of that, or it could be a third party coming in and knocking some heads together. The only country in the region that has that capacity would be China. And while the Chinese are okay with Myanmar being weak, they are not okay with being the power that have to come in and then take over the security situation, because it would be just as hard for them as it has been for the Burman. So unfortunately, despite a reasonably favorable geography in the core, this is a country whose time has not yet come and will not until we can have some sort of political resolution which does not, unfortunately, appear to be on the horizon. All right, that’s it. Bye.

More from Peter Zeihan