We have a fascinating issue developing with act blue. Act blue is the remarkably successful online fundraising system that the Democrats have been developing now for years. This year, it probably will raise a billion dollars off of credit cards. People get on it. They can pick the candidate they want to support. Sometimes they get on a recurring basis, you know, $20 a week or $50 a month. And it’s been very successful, except it now turns out that a part of act blue may be open to fraud on a pretty grand scale, of the billion dollars that has been raised so far on act blue in this election cycle, 400 million was raised without learning what the security code on the credit card was. Now, if you look at your credit card, you have that little security code. The reason that’s there is it’s proof that it’s really you, because people can lift the actual card number, but if they don’t have that security code, they can’t prove that it’s a valid card. Well, hack blue does not require the security code. Now, why does that matter? Because somebody can hack in, take your card. It’s basically identity theft in the classic sense. There is a Republican consultant in Wisconsin who suddenly discovered that his card had been used over 400 times to give money through act blue, even though he was a Republican and hadn’t given a penny through act blue. He then further found out that 35 of those donations went to Kamala Harris. He’s now filing a lawsuit under a Wisconsin racketeering act, because as far as he’s concerned, back blue became a vehicle for racketeering. Now I think this is the sort of thing you have to be very careful about. Identity theft is a huge problem, but identity theft if, for example, the Iranians were in the process of the way they would do it is they would buy a lot of gift cards, then they would turn the gift cards into a donation, and suddenly you can do it. The Federal Election Commission doesn’t require donations under $200 to be looked at. So you can give $50 at a time, and all of a sudden you could have given $5,000 but it was never in a single unit above $200 so you would not have appeared. And this has gotten serious enough that in well over a dozen states, the attorney generals are now actively investigating act blue, the US Congress, particularly the Committee on House administration, is now actively investigating and in fact, has sent a subpoena to the leadership of act blue, demanding that they come in and answer a series of questions, and the FBI is now engaged. This could be a gigantic scandal involving an enormous amount of fraudulent and potentially foreign contributions to the Harris campaign. It’s going to be fascinating to watch it play out.
ActBlue donations could be enormous online fundraising scandal
By Straight Arrow News
Both President-elect Trump and Vice President Harris’ campaigns raised hundreds of millions of dollars in their bids for the White House, with a significant portion coming from online sources. One of the largest Democratic fundraising platforms, ActBlue, is now under investigation by a House committee and multiple state attorneys general over allegations of illegal donations. A Republican strategist from Wisconsin even claims that ActBlue stole his identity to make hundreds of donations to left-wing causes.
Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich explains how ActBlue’s alleged identity theft and illegal contributions from foreign actors can undermine election integrity and calls this a scandal we should all watch closely.
Be the first to know when Newt Gingrich publishes a new opinion! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
ActBlue is the remarkably successful online fundraising system that the Democrats have been developing now for years. This year, it probably will raise a billion dollars off of credit cards. People get on it. They can pick the candidate they want to support. Sometimes they get on a recurring basis, you know, $20 a week or $50 a month. And it’s been very successful.
Except it now turns out that a part of ActBlue may be open to fraud on a pretty grand scale. Of the billion dollars that has been raised so far on ActBlue in this election cycle, $400 million was raised without learning what the security code on the credit card was. Now, if you look at your credit card, you have that little security code. The reason that’s there is it’s proof that it’s really you, because people can lift the actual card number, but if they don’t have that security code, they can’t prove that it’s a valid card. Well, ActBlue does not require the security code.
Now, why does that matter? Because somebody can hack in, take your card. It’s basically identity theft in the classic sense.
We have a fascinating issue developing with act blue. Act blue is the remarkably successful online fundraising system that the Democrats have been developing now for years. This year, it probably will raise a billion dollars off of credit cards. People get on it. They can pick the candidate they want to support. Sometimes they get on a recurring basis, you know, $20 a week or $50 a month. And it’s been very successful, except it now turns out that a part of act blue may be open to fraud on a pretty grand scale, of the billion dollars that has been raised so far on act blue in this election cycle, 400 million was raised without learning what the security code on the credit card was. Now, if you look at your credit card, you have that little security code. The reason that’s there is it’s proof that it’s really you, because people can lift the actual card number, but if they don’t have that security code, they can’t prove that it’s a valid card. Well, hack blue does not require the security code. Now, why does that matter? Because somebody can hack in, take your card. It’s basically identity theft in the classic sense. There is a Republican consultant in Wisconsin who suddenly discovered that his card had been used over 400 times to give money through act blue, even though he was a Republican and hadn’t given a penny through act blue. He then further found out that 35 of those donations went to Kamala Harris. He’s now filing a lawsuit under a Wisconsin racketeering act, because as far as he’s concerned, back blue became a vehicle for racketeering. Now I think this is the sort of thing you have to be very careful about. Identity theft is a huge problem, but identity theft if, for example, the Iranians were in the process of the way they would do it is they would buy a lot of gift cards, then they would turn the gift cards into a donation, and suddenly you can do it. The Federal Election Commission doesn’t require donations under $200 to be looked at. So you can give $50 at a time, and all of a sudden you could have given $5,000 but it was never in a single unit above $200 so you would not have appeared. And this has gotten serious enough that in well over a dozen states, the attorney generals are now actively investigating act blue, the US Congress, particularly the Committee on House administration, is now actively investigating and in fact, has sent a subpoena to the leadership of act blue, demanding that they come in and answer a series of questions, and the FBI is now engaged. This could be a gigantic scandal involving an enormous amount of fraudulent and potentially foreign contributions to the Harris campaign. It’s going to be fascinating to watch it play out.
Control of the Senate is also at stake in 2024 election
Sinwar’s death a good thing for both Israel and America
A new approach to tackling hurricane disaster response
Secret Service needs dramatic reform, not just more money
Underreported stories from each side
Philadelphia Election Official Tells Non-Citizens They Can Vote
9 sources | 0% from the left Getty ImagesJan. 6 defendant seeks case delay citing Trump’s pardon promise
28 sources | 13% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
Clean energy sector reacts to potential policy shifts after Trump victory
8 states overwhelmingly approve noncitizen voting ballot measures
RFK Jr. talks potential role in Trump admin, says he won’t take away vaccines
Category 3 Hurricane Rafael threatens Cuba, the Gulf in rare November storm
MI officials dismiss voter fraud claims in viral Project Veritas video
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
ActBlue donations could be enormous online fundraising scandal
4 hrs ago Newt GingrichThree ways the Washington Post can restore its credibility
Yesterday Ben WeingartenNewsom has it right, legacy admissions have to go
Yesterday Ruben NavarretteMy final predictions for the 2024 US elections
Monday David Pakman