Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Donald Trump has finally been subpoenaed by the house committee investigating his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. As much as this subpoena is extraordinary given the circumstances, the former president has never been big on complying with legal mandates so I don’t expect him to comply with this congressional subpoena, either.
And it’s likely that Congress doesn’t expect him to comply. For several reasons, subpoenaing Donald Trump at this point appears to be a mere performative antic that does not advance We The People, but will cost us considerably. Let me explain. As we all know, Trump abuses the legal system – particularly when it comes to dodging accountability. He proffers untenable arguments and makes frivolous claims, drowning his opponents in filing after filing. This strategy is an effective one when it comes to avoiding accountability because it promotes delay.
Over the span of time during which Trump drags his feet in court, seeking continuances and extensions, something very noteworthy happens beyond just amassing legal fees. Power changes. In this situation, the power in Congress is forecasted to change while Trump delays. And that’s what he’s likely hoping for. The midterm elections are right around the corner. Early polls indicate that republicans may take over the House. If that nightmare comes to fruition, do you really think that the House Committee subpoenaing Trump’s involvement in the January 6th insurrection on the U.S. Capitol will continue?
Do you really think GOP representatives will persist in ensuring justice is done here? If so, I have beachfront property in Utah that I would love to show you. Seriously. If republicans take the House come January 2023 when the proverbial “congressional guards” change, the Trump subpoena will be kaput. All Trump needs to do is delay another few months, which will not be hard for numerous reasons.
For instance, case law is murky on the matter of whether a former president has to comply with a Congressional subpoena for actions he engaged in while in office.
Trump’s bound to exploit the holes in the jurisprudence via motions, appeals, Supreme Court petitions. And we know how it can take months, if not years, for our legal system to actually act. Plus, even if his legal challenges are exhausted, it’s going to be exhausting waiting for Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide whether to pursue charges against the former president, especially if he tries to evade congressional subpoenas here.
Remember: Contempt of Congress, it’s a misdemeanor. If the U.S. Attorney isn’t inclined to charge Trump for all of the classified documents he clearly stole, I doubt DOJ would pursue misdemeanor charges against him.
It gave former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows a pass so I’m sure DOJ would do it for Trump here. All said, I predict Trump will probably just clog the matter in the court system for far longer than the Democrats will control the House.
So in the wake of an anticipated power shift, why did the House Committee wait so damn long to subpoena the former president, knowing good and well that he’s a mastermind of litigious delay and knowing good and well how our justice system works?
I can’t answer that question without speculatively undermining the committee’s true goals here. But I can damn sure tell you that the delay in issuing the subpoena does not seem to serve in the best interests of We the People by advancing accountability as it concerns the attacks on our country. I want to be wrong on that. Then again, whether I am wrong may be a matter of whether those who want to protect our democracy get out and vote blue this November.
-
Sonia Sotomayor can and should remain on Supreme Court
American public trust in the U.S. Supreme Court — and Americans’ belief that the court can behave free from the influence of politics — is low and getting lower. The court has a conservative majority, and recently ruled in favor of Donald Trump against the United States itself. Some liberals, concerned that Trump might move… -
Six disturbing takeaways from Project 2025
Former President Donald Trump has consistently claimed that he had no involvement with Project 2025, a 922-page blueprint for the next Republican president from a far-right think tank called The Heritage Foundation, saying he has not read it and does not know who is behind it. Project 2025 has numerous close connections to Donald Trump,… -
Forced prison labor is modern-day slavery in California
On this upcoming Election Day in California, in addition to voting for the next U.S. president, residents will decide on Proposition 6 — a measure to end the use of forced labor in prisons. While the California Constitution currently prohibits forced labor, it makes an exception for criminal punishment. This means prisoners without qualifying exemptions… -
Only Kamala Harris can be trusted with US nuclear arsenal
The 2024 Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese peace advocacy organization led by survivors of the atomic blasts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since its founding after World War II, Nihon Hidankyo has lobbied for a world without any nuclear weapons, a goal known as “nuclear zero” or “global zero” among… -
Hold Impact Plastics accountable for employee hurricane deaths
On Sept. 27, eleven workers at a Tennessee plastics plant were swept away by floodwaters from Hurricane Helene while clinging to the back of a flatbed semitruck as the water rapidly rose. The truck was later struck by debris, causing at least 10 employees of Impact Plastics to be thrown into the floodwaters. Five workers…
Latest Opinions
-
Bolton says Gaetz, Gabbard should be investigated by FBI before confirmation
-
9 lawsuits filed against NYC’s congestion pricing plan
-
World’s top polluting cities unveiled by Al Gore, Climate TRACE at COP29
-
‘Tiger King’s’ Joe Exotic pens letter to Trump asking for pardon, role in cabinet
-
Trump appoints aide Steven Cheung to head White House communications
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.