Let’s head across the pond this week, as there is a matter there that is worth considering. The U.K. announced that it is repatriating some of Ghana’s crown jewels, returning them to the African nation after having looted them from the Asante kings during the 19th century. Britain is said to be “loaning” the Ghanaian government the 32 gold artifacts, with the expectation that Ghana will return them to the U.K. at the end of a three-year term. Yeah, the reason that they must be loaned is because the U.K. has laws banning return of artifacts to their countries of origin.
These developments across the pond should remind us that the audacious nature of the colonizer spirit is alive and well today. And it must be reckoned with if we are going to have peace on a global level. Let’s be real: If the Brits had to return everything in their museums which did not originate with them, those museums would be barren. In fact, in just the Victoria and Albert Museum alone, there are 2.8 million items that belong to countries demanding repatriation. Yet the U.K. won’t do so on account of the British Museum Act of 1963 and the National Heritage Act of 1983 prohibiting the “de-ascensioning” of the items in their collections, or so they say. Yeah, the country built its wealth on the backs of nations that it raped and pillaged for centuries. And now the U.K. claims its hands are tied, and it can’t give those countries back their sacred cultural pieces because of the laws of the U.K. itself created.
The nerve! 2023 was supposed to be the year of the repatriation of artifacts. This time last year, the Houston Museum of National Sciences returned a wooden sarcophagus to Egypt that had been looted. A stolen Christopher Columbus letter was returned to Italy even though we know that dude is King Colonizer. Looted antiquities went back to Nepal, we shut down many indigenous sections of museums and returned items to tribes. The fact is the need for the reckoning is on a global scale, yet the U.K. doesn’t seem to get the message. From the Benin Bronzes to the Parthenon sculptures, the British continue their colonization by refusing to return what they have stolen.
It enrages me to the nth degree because it simply confirms that there is no real reckoning about colonization of the Global South. Rather, the raping and pillaging continues to be proudly put on display behind glass and Britain museums, if not maybe loaned back to the originating country as though the U.K. still holds some kind of rightful claim. God forbid the Brits simply develop their own culture rather than steal that of others. Because what, by holding on to that which doesn’t belong to the Brits, they’re really kind of just underscoring the notion that raping and pillaging is their culture.
Related
Adrienne Lawrence
Legal analyst, law professor & award-winning author
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Global warming won’t impact Russian-Chinese shipping
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Can other nations replicate success of US shale revolution?
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Peace between Israel and Iran, at least for now
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
UK keeping colonialism alive and well
Jan 31
By Straight Arrow News
The United Kingdom has agreed to loan 23 royal artifacts taken from the Asante Empire (modern Ghana) back to a museum in Kumasi, Ghana for a term of three years. The British looted the valuable items from the Asante during the Anglo-Asante wars of 1824 to 1900.
Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence says that the British are keeping colonialism “alive and well” by refusing to return these and other looted items to their native homes.
These developments across the pond should remind us that the audacious nature of the colonizer spirit is alive and well today. And it must be reckoned with if we are going to have peace on a global level. Let’s be real: If the Brits had to return everything in their museums which did not originate with them, those museums would be barren. In fact, in just the Victoria and Albert Museum alone, there are 2.8 million items that belong to countries demanding repatriation. Yet the U.K. won’t do so on account of the British Museum Act of 1963 and the National Heritage Act of 1983 prohibiting the “de-ascensioning” of the items in their collections, or so they say. Yeah, the country built its wealth on the backs of nations that it raped and pillaged for centuries. And now the U.K. claims its hands are tied, and it can’t give those countries back their sacred cultural pieces because of the laws of the U.K. itself created.
The nerve!
2023 was supposed to be the year of the repatriation of artifacts. This time last year, the Houston Museum of National Sciences returned a wooden sarcophagus to Egypt that had been looted. A stolen Christopher Columbus letter was returned to Italy even though we know that dude is King Colonizer. Looted antiquities went back to Nepal. We shut down many indigenous sections of museums and returned items to tribes. The fact is the need for the reckoning is on a global scale, yet the U.K. doesn’t seem to get the message. From the Benin Bronzes to the Parthenon sculptures, the British continue their colonization by refusing to return what they have stolen.
Let’s head across the pond this week, as there is a matter there that is worth considering. The U.K. announced that it is repatriating some of Ghana’s crown jewels, returning them to the African nation after having looted them from the Asante kings during the 19th century. Britain is said to be “loaning” the Ghanaian government the 32 gold artifacts, with the expectation that Ghana will return them to the U.K. at the end of a three-year term. Yeah, the reason that they must be loaned is because the U.K. has laws banning return of artifacts to their countries of origin.
These developments across the pond should remind us that the audacious nature of the colonizer spirit is alive and well today. And it must be reckoned with if we are going to have peace on a global level. Let’s be real: If the Brits had to return everything in their museums which did not originate with them, those museums would be barren. In fact, in just the Victoria and Albert Museum alone, there are 2.8 million items that belong to countries demanding repatriation. Yet the U.K. won’t do so on account of the British Museum Act of 1963 and the National Heritage Act of 1983 prohibiting the “de-ascensioning” of the items in their collections, or so they say. Yeah, the country built its wealth on the backs of nations that it raped and pillaged for centuries. And now the U.K. claims its hands are tied, and it can’t give those countries back their sacred cultural pieces because of the laws of the U.K. itself created.
The nerve! 2023 was supposed to be the year of the repatriation of artifacts. This time last year, the Houston Museum of National Sciences returned a wooden sarcophagus to Egypt that had been looted. A stolen Christopher Columbus letter was returned to Italy even though we know that dude is King Colonizer. Looted antiquities went back to Nepal, we shut down many indigenous sections of museums and returned items to tribes. The fact is the need for the reckoning is on a global scale, yet the U.K. doesn’t seem to get the message. From the Benin Bronzes to the Parthenon sculptures, the British continue their colonization by refusing to return what they have stolen.
It enrages me to the nth degree because it simply confirms that there is no real reckoning about colonization of the Global South. Rather, the raping and pillaging continues to be proudly put on display behind glass and Britain museums, if not maybe loaned back to the originating country as though the U.K. still holds some kind of rightful claim. God forbid the Brits simply develop their own culture rather than steal that of others. Because what, by holding on to that which doesn’t belong to the Brits, they’re really kind of just underscoring the notion that raping and pillaging is their culture.
Related
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
Wednesday
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
Apr 17
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
Apr 10
Gen Z women must fight for their rights
Gen Z, the first “digital native” U.S. generation, is entering the workforce, studying at university and serving in the military. From school shootings and cyber-bullying to COVID-19 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this generation has been shaped by unique trends and events, and how they will behave as citizens and voters is an…
Apr 3
Users must have rights in Big Tech’s AI race
Big Tech companies across the board, including Meta, X, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are racing to draft policies that enable them to use user-generated content to train advanced generative AI models without user permission or compensation. The Federal Trade Commission is investigating where it can, but government regulations lag far behind the rapid pace of…
Mar 27
Underreported stories from each side
Biden’s 13th-Quarter Approval Average Lowest Historically
8 sources | 13% from the left
AP Images
Jamie Raskin Slams Supreme Court Over Trump Immunity Case: ‘Acting Like A Bunch Of Partisan Operatives’
6 sources | 0% from the right
AP Images
Latest Stories
Biden uses NFL draft ad to try to connect with young voters
Watch 2:16
Yesterday
Powering pot: Energy for US cannabis industry could electrify 13.5M homes
Watch 1:29
Yesterday
Allies plan for Trump to have more control over interest rates
Watch 3:07
Yesterday
FDA: Bird flu found in 1/5 commercial milk samples, suggests greater spread
Watch 1:21
Yesterday
China permanently deploys warships to second overseas base
Watch 2:58
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
House Speaker Johnson’s foreign aid bill shows a focused GOP
Yesterday
Star Parker
Trump’s own behavior betrays his guilt
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Portraying far-left and far-right as equal in ‘Civil War’ is wrong
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Who will Trump pick for vice presidential running mate?
Thursday
Matthew Continetti