Everyone, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from rainy Colorado. It’s been our wettest spring on record, and we’re about to get a half an inch a day, for at least the next three weeks. Sweet! Anyway, last Friday and then over the weekend, we had a lot of interesting statements out of specifically, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. The one that caught the most attention from people is actually pretty funny, and the statement is that, “Russia asserts that it has the world’s second-most powerful military and a number of people believe them. But the … now people are saying that Russia is the second-most powerful military in Ukraine.”
Now, I got a good chuckle out of that one because the Russians are not doing very well and the Ukrainian counter-offensive is clearly deep into shaping operations. Now, before you celebrate Russia’s weakness, a little bit of history. I’m not going to talk about the weapons or reserves or how many tanks the Russians have, because oh my God, they’ve got so many. And so we’ll look back at history. Russia has never been a capital intensive power. It has always relied upon numbers to fight its war and for the weather to do a lot of the heavy lifting, and for distance to inhibit the ability of its foes to function in its territory. What that leaves us with is a country that is both fragile and incredibly strong at the same time, historically speaking. And so when a country will come at the Russians with a technological advantage, especially when it involves movement, they will do great because once you break through the outer perimeter, if you can get fast and loose into Russian core territories, the Russians can barely move within their own territory.
So whether it’s the British at the Crimean War or the French in early 1800s, or the Poles during the Time of Troubles, or the Japanese in 1905, you know, it doesn’t really matter what era of history you’re looking at, you can find easily a major war where the Russians were absolutely crushed. But it’s one thing to de — defeat Russia’s armed formations, and it’s quite another to eliminate Russia as a threat in the long term. One just requires hitting their troop concentrations and their logistics packages. The second requires root and branch ripping up most of the industrial-level infrastructure, and the entirety of the governing structure, over a swath of territory that is the world’s largest national landmass.
So I understand what Blinken is, after here. He’s trying to rally the alliance to give a lot now when it’s going to really make a big difference to the Ukrainians. This is going to be a critical year for them. But on the other side of this, we’re gonna have to deal with either a resurgent Russia or a very, very bitter Russia that still has a few thousand nuclear weapons. We’re at the very beginning still, have a very long process. And even if this goes every way that people who are rooting for the Ukrainians hope and this really is the beginning of the end of the Russian system, belittling them now isn’t going to speed that process along outside of kind of the tactical boosts that it gets from people giving more weapons in the short term.
Anyway, word of warning. I’m still rooting for the Ukrainians here, still hoping, actually, I’m pretty confident that Russia will cease to exist as a country in my lifetime. Love to see that forward loaded, but I’d like to see it without a nucular exchange too. Alright, that’s it for me. Take care.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How Israel blew up pagers and radios in Lebanon
19 hrs ago Peter Zeihan‘I don’t trust Kamala’: Why some Black men are voting Trump
Yesterday Dr. Frank LuntzThe future of US-Saudi relations
Yesterday Peter ZeihanThe impact of hurricanes on oil and energy supplies
Tuesday Peter ZeihanRussia military woes in Ukraine are no laughing matter
By Straight Arrow News
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken mocked Russia’s armed forces during a speech in Finland, saying that “many see Russia’s military as the second-strongest in Ukraine.” Those remarks came about after a more detailed dissection of the Kremlin’s strategic failures in the Ukraine War.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says that while he appreciates a good joke at Vladimir Putin’s expense, he cautions that Russia’s military woes in Ukraine are no laughing matter.
Excerpted from Peter’s June 6 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
While in Helsinki, Secretary of State Blinken got some chuckles from the crowd (and me) when he said, “The Kremlin often claimed it had the second strongest military in the world, and many believed it. Today, many see Russia’s military as the second strongest in Ukraine.”
I’m all for some dark humor and ill-timed comedic relief (especially when it’s used to garner more aid and support for Ukraine), but I don’t want us to lose sight of who we’re talking about. A glance at the history books will show you a myriad of crushing defeats for the Russians, yet they persist.
Russia is both incredibly weak and resilient. While I’m confident that this is the beginning of the end of the Russian system, belittling them in this conflict isn’t going to speed up that process. On the other side of this war, we will be left with a resurgent Russia or a very bitter Russia (who happens to have 1,000+ nuclear warheads at their disposal).
Just a word of warning. You can still giggle at Russia’s incompetence or silly Putin memes, but don’t forget who we’re dealing with…
Everyone, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from rainy Colorado. It’s been our wettest spring on record, and we’re about to get a half an inch a day, for at least the next three weeks. Sweet! Anyway, last Friday and then over the weekend, we had a lot of interesting statements out of specifically, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. The one that caught the most attention from people is actually pretty funny, and the statement is that, “Russia asserts that it has the world’s second-most powerful military and a number of people believe them. But the … now people are saying that Russia is the second-most powerful military in Ukraine.”
Now, I got a good chuckle out of that one because the Russians are not doing very well and the Ukrainian counter-offensive is clearly deep into shaping operations. Now, before you celebrate Russia’s weakness, a little bit of history. I’m not going to talk about the weapons or reserves or how many tanks the Russians have, because oh my God, they’ve got so many. And so we’ll look back at history. Russia has never been a capital intensive power. It has always relied upon numbers to fight its war and for the weather to do a lot of the heavy lifting, and for distance to inhibit the ability of its foes to function in its territory. What that leaves us with is a country that is both fragile and incredibly strong at the same time, historically speaking. And so when a country will come at the Russians with a technological advantage, especially when it involves movement, they will do great because once you break through the outer perimeter, if you can get fast and loose into Russian core territories, the Russians can barely move within their own territory.
So whether it’s the British at the Crimean War or the French in early 1800s, or the Poles during the Time of Troubles, or the Japanese in 1905, you know, it doesn’t really matter what era of history you’re looking at, you can find easily a major war where the Russians were absolutely crushed. But it’s one thing to de — defeat Russia’s armed formations, and it’s quite another to eliminate Russia as a threat in the long term. One just requires hitting their troop concentrations and their logistics packages. The second requires root and branch ripping up most of the industrial-level infrastructure, and the entirety of the governing structure, over a swath of territory that is the world’s largest national landmass.
So I understand what Blinken is, after here. He’s trying to rally the alliance to give a lot now when it’s going to really make a big difference to the Ukrainians. This is going to be a critical year for them. But on the other side of this, we’re gonna have to deal with either a resurgent Russia or a very, very bitter Russia that still has a few thousand nuclear weapons. We’re at the very beginning still, have a very long process. And even if this goes every way that people who are rooting for the Ukrainians hope and this really is the beginning of the end of the Russian system, belittling them now isn’t going to speed that process along outside of kind of the tactical boosts that it gets from people giving more weapons in the short term.
Anyway, word of warning. I’m still rooting for the Ukrainians here, still hoping, actually, I’m pretty confident that Russia will cease to exist as a country in my lifetime. Love to see that forward loaded, but I’d like to see it without a nucular exchange too. Alright, that’s it for me. Take care.
How Israel blew up pagers and radios in Lebanon
The future of US-Saudi relations
The impact of hurricanes on oil and energy supplies
The future of Taiwan and advanced semiconductor chips
The self-inflicted downfall of Mexican energy
Underreported stories from each side
Secret Service, DHS sued over first Trump assassination attempt
9 sources | 22% from the left Getty ImagesLeaders of Democratic protest of Israel-Hamas war won’t endorse Harris but warn against Trump
37 sources | 15% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
IDF accused of pushing bodies from rooftops in West Bank raid
Lawmaker, FCC commissioner clash over Trump call to strip ABC’s license
Mark Robinson vows to stay in NC governor race after CNN report
Kentucky sheriff charged with killing judge inside courthouse
Israel strikes Lebanon as Hezbollah vows revenge for explosions
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Kamala Harris’ secret is her mystique
19 hrs ago Matthew ContinettiDon’t let your Trump-supporting partner influence your vote
19 hrs ago Jordan ReidTrump’s growing appeal among minority male voters
Yesterday Newt GingrichCitizens shouldn’t need AI to tell them how to vote
Yesterday Adrienne Lawrence