CENSORSHIP OF SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT HAS BEEN A HOT TOPIC.
THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ONLY ESCALATING THE CONVERSATION ON “WHO HAS THE POWER TO CENSOR WHAT.”
A GROUP OF ATTORNEYS GENERAL SAY SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES HAVE INFRINGED ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT…WITH THE HELP OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL JEFF LANDRY AND ERIC SCHMIDT ARE LEADING A ‘LANDMARK LAWSUIT.’
SEVERAL STATE LEADERS GOING AFTER BIG TECH AND BIG GOVERNMENT…
THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THE GOVERNMENT WAS HELPING TO DECIDE WHAT COVID-19 INFORMATION SHOULD BE CENSORED OUT.
THEY’RE NAMING A STAGGERING 67 DEFENDANTS IN THE SUIT…RANGING FROM WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS TO C-D-C EMPLOYEES.
THE TIMING OF IT COMES AS TWITTER JUST CENSORED FLORIDA STATE’S SURGEON GENERAL LAST WEEK FOR A POST ON COVID DATA.
THE TWEET IN QUESTION WAS ABOUT RESULTS FROM A STUDY WHICH FOUND MEN AGES 18 TO 39 HAVE AN 84 PERCENT INCREASED RISK OF CARDIAC-RELATED DEATH WITHIN 28 DAYS OF TAKING THE VACCINE.
THE FLORIDA SURGEON GENERAL RECOMMENDING AGAINST THE SHOT FOR THIS DEMOGRAPHIC.
TWITTER REVERSED IT’S BLOCK ON THE STATE OFFICIAL’S ACCOUNT A FEW DAYS LATER.
FLORIDA SAID THE STUDY IS BACKED BY ANALYSIS.
OTHER EXPERTS ARGUE AGAINST ITS FINDINGS…SAYING IT’S LIMITED IN SCOPE.
THE POINT OF THE LAWSUIT…IS THIS TYPE OF DEBATE SHOULD BE WELCOMED AND NOT CENSORED OUT.