- Chapters
- descriptions off, selected
- captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
- captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Ben & Jerry’s alleges its CEO was fired for political reasons
By Lauren Keenan (Anchor), Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer)
- Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company, Unilever, of firing CEO David Stever over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. The company claims Stever was ousted without board approval.
- Ben & Jerry’s has a long history of progressive activism, including statements on political issues such as supporting a ceasefire in Gaza in January 2024.
- Unilever has not commented on the amended lawsuit but previously stated it would defend itself against Ben & Jerry’s claims.
Full Story
Ben & Jerry’s is accusing its parent company of firing its CEO over his political activism, violating a merger agreement. In an amended court filing from Tuesday, March 18, the ice cream company said CEO David Stever was ousted without the board’s approval after he made public comments on progressive issues.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ben & Jerry's claims its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
- Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, about the removal of Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
- Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
- Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Ben & Jerry’s claims that Unilever unlawfully removed CEO David Stever due to political activism, as stated in their court filing.
- The filing alleges that Unilever aimed to silence Ben & Jerry’s social mission, threatening personnel if they did not comply.
- Unilever's actions allegedly violate a 2000 merger agreement, which grants the independent board authority over social missions.
- Tensions escalated after Ben & Jerry’s stopped sales in the West Bank and faced restrictions on political statements.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
The company initially filed a lawsuit in November accusing its conglomerate owner, Unilever, of silencing its public statements in support of Palestinian refugees amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.
In January 2024, the Ben & Jerry’s board issued a statement to the Financial Times calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, with its chair saying that “peace is a core value” of the company.
According to the amended complaint, Stever was fired March 3, after Unilever “repeatedly threatened” the ice cream maker’s employees “should they fail to comply with Unilever’s efforts to silence the social mission,” Ben & Jerry’s filing said.
Lawyers for Ben & Jerry’s said terms in its 2000 merger protect “Ben & Jerry’s interests by precluding the unilateral removal of its CEO.”
What is the history of Ben & Jerry’s taking a political stance?
Since the company debuted in 1978, it’s been known for its left-leaning advocacy and was able to maintain an independent board of directors, furthering its progressive activism even after it sold to Unilever in 2000.
The company continued to share its stance on various political and social issues over the years, including a statement on Jan. 7, 2021, calling the Jan. 6 Capitol attack a “Riot to uphold white supremacy.”
In another instance in July 2021, tensions escalated when Ben & Jerry’s said it would stop selling ice cream to Israelis in the West Bank, reiterating its stance in 2022 on X.
“We continue to believe it is inconsistent with Ben & Jerry’s values for our ice cream to be sold in the occupied Palestinian territory.”
We continue to believe it is inconsistent with Ben & Jerry's values for our ice cream to be sold in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
— Ben & Jerry's (@benandjerrys) June 29, 2022
(🧵3/3)
Unilever has not commented on the amended filing but said last year it would defend itself against the November lawsuit, which claims it stopped letting Ben & Jerry’s take certain political stances.
What happens next?
In March 2024, Unilever announced its plans to spin off its ice cream division, including Ben & Jerry’s, later in 2025. If the move is successful, it will end the companies’ partnership, which has spanned two and a half decades.
[Lauren]
BEN AND JERRY’S IS ACCUSING ITS PARENT COMPANY OF FIRING ITS C-E-O OVER HIS POLITICAL ACTIVISM, VIOLATING A MERGER AGREEMENT.
IN AN AMENDED COURT FILING TUESDAY, THE ICE CREAM COMPANY, SAYS ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DAVID STEVER, WAS OUSTED WITHOUT THE BOARD’S APPROVAL, AFTER MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROGRESSIVE ISSUES.
BEN AND JERRY’S INITIALLY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NOVEMBER ACCUSING ITS CONGLOMERATE OWNER, UNILEVER, OF SILENCING ITS PUBLIC STATEMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PALESTINIAN REFUGEES AMID THE ONGOING ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR.
IN JANUARY 20-24 … THE BOARD OF BEN AND JERRY’S ISSUED A STATEMENT TO THE FINANCIAL TIMES CALLING FOR A CEASEFIRE IN GAZA.
THE BOARD CHAIR EMPHASIZED “PEACE IS A CORE VALUE” OF THE COMPANY.
ACCORDING TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, STEVER WAS FIRED MARCH THIRD AFTER UNILEVER REPEATEDLY THREATENED PERSONNEL “SHOULD THEY FAIL TO COMPLY WITH UNILEVER’S EFFORTS TO SILENCE THE SOCIAL MISSION.”
LAWYERS FOR BEN AND JERRY’S SAY RULES STEMMING FROM ITS 2000 MERGER PROTECT QUOTE “BEN AND JERRY’S INTERESTS BY PRECLUDING THE UNILATERAL REMOVAL OF ITS C-E-O.”
SINCE THE COMPANY DEBUTED IN 1978, IT’S BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS LEFT-LEANING ADVOCACY AND WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN AN INDEPENDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CONTINUE ITS PROGRESSIVE ACTIVISM EVEN AFTER IT SOLD TO UNILEVER IN 2000 – SHARING ITS STANCE ON VARIOUS POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES OVER THE YEARS …
INCLUDING A STATEMENT ON JANUARY 7, 2021 CALLING THE EVENTS OF THE PREVIOUS DAY A “RIOT TO UPHOLD WHITE SUPREMACY,” IN RESPONSE TO THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL.
UNILEVER HAS NOT COMMENTED ON THE AMENDED FILING, BUT SAID IT WOULD DEFEND ITSELF AGAINST THE NOVEMBER LAWSUIT CLAIMING IT STOPPED LETTING BEN AND JERRY’S TAKE CERTAIN POLITICAL STANCES.
IN ANOTHER INSTANCE IN JULY 20-21, TENSIONS ESCALATED WHEN BEN AND JERRY’S SAID IT WOULD STOP SELLING ICE CREAM TO ISRAELIS IN THE WEST BANK, REITERATING ITS STANCE IN 20-22 ON X SAYING
“WE CONTINUE TO BELIEVE IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH BEN & JERRY’S VALUES FOR OUR ICE CREAM TO BE SOLD IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY.”
IN MARCH 20-24, UNILEVER ANNOUNCED ITS PLANS TO SPIN OFF ITS ICE CREAM DIVISION, INCLUDING BEN AND JERRY’S.
IF THE MOVE IS SUCCESSFUL LATER THIS YEAR IT WILL END THE 25 YEAR PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO COMPANIES.
FOR SAN, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.
FOR ALL YOUR LATEST NEWS HEADLINES – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ben & Jerry's claims its CEO, David Stever, was unlawfully removed by Unilever due to the company's social and political activism, according to a federal court filing.
- Unilever informed Ben & Jerry's on March 3, about the removal of Stever without consultation, allegedly violating their merger agreement.
- Ben & Jerry's lawsuit against Unilever accuses the parent company of blocking statements in support of Palestinians and attempting to silence its advocacy, which Unilever denies.
- Anuradha Mittal, chair of the independent board, stated that Stever's removal disregards Ben & Jerry's mission, values, and the autonomy protected by the merger agreement with Unilever.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Ben & Jerry’s claims that Unilever unlawfully removed CEO David Stever due to political activism, as stated in their court filing.
- The filing alleges that Unilever aimed to silence Ben & Jerry’s social mission, threatening personnel if they did not comply.
- Unilever's actions allegedly violate a 2000 merger agreement, which grants the independent board authority over social missions.
- Tensions escalated after Ben & Jerry’s stopped sales in the West Bank and faced restrictions on political statements.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
MARCO BELLO/AFP via Getty Images
Bondi rescinds journalist protections amid focus on government leaks
ReadFriday -
Getty Images
CA proposes bill requiring overnight parking at colleges for homeless students
Watch 3:00Friday -
Former judge arrested after alleged gang member lived at his home
Watch 2:01Friday -
Julia Demaree Nikhinson, Associated Press
Former US Rep. George Santos sentenced to more than 7 years in prison
Watch 3:13Friday