Skip to main content
U.S.

Ben & Jerry’s says parent company is silencing its pro-Palestinian views

Share

Ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s is suing its parent company, Unilever, accusing it of silencing the brand’s attempts to speak out in support of Palestinians. Ben & Jerry’s filed the lawsuit in federal court this week, claiming Unilever has repeatedly violated agreements that protect the brand’s independence.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 42% Center 50% Right 8%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The complaint alleges Unilever blocked the company from making statements, taking actions and making donations to certain activism groups. The lawsuit accused the company of attempting to intimidate its personnel into silence.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

At the heart of the dispute is Ben & Jerry’s independent board. It was established in 2000 when Unilever acquired the company. The board was designed to ensure the ice cream brand could continue its activism.

Ben & Jerry’s claims Unilever has tried to dismantle the board and shut down its efforts to speak out on social issues, including pro-Palestinian messaging during the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.

The lawsuit provides several examples of Unilever allegedly blocking Ben & Jerry’s from taking a stand.

In December 2023, Ben & Jerry’s sought to release a statement calling for a cease-fire in Gaza. However, the complaint alleges Unilever threatened to break up the board if the statement was issued.

In May, Ben & Jerry’s wanted to tweet in support of Palestinian safe passage to the U.K. The company claims Unilever blocked the tweet.

Unilever allegedly cited concerns about current events in the Middle East, including an Iranian missile attack on Israel at the time.

The following month, Ben & Jerry’s attempted to release a statement backing student protests over civilian deaths in Gaza but was allegedly blocked again.

In September, the lawsuit claims Unilever stopped Ben & Jerry’s from supporting legislation introduced by Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders to block U.S. arms sales to Israel.

Ben & Jerry’s also said Unilever blocked donations to organizations such as Jewish Voice for Peace and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, citing concerns over the groups’ anti-Israel stances.

In 2021, Ben & Jerry’s also sued Unilever to prevent the sale of ice cream in Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Unilever has previously stated it wants to remain “neutral” on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Unilever has rejected the accusations in Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit and said it will defend itself “very strongly” in court.

Tags: , , ,

[Karah]

ICE CREAM MAKER BEN & JERRY’S IS SUING ITS PARENT COMPANY, UNILEVER, ACCUSING IT OF SILENCING THE BRAND’S ATTEMPTS TO SPEAK OUT IN SUPPORT OF PALESTINIANS.

BEN & JERRY’S FILED THE LAWSUIT IN FEDERAL COURT THIS WEEK, CLAIMING UNILEVER HAS REPEATEDLY VIOLATED AGREEMENTS THAT PROTECT THE BRAND’S INDEPENDENCE. 

THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES UNILEVER HAS BLOCKED THE COMPANY FROM MAKING STATEMENTS, TAKING ACTIONS, AND EVEN MAKING DONATIONS TO CERTAIN ACTIVISM GROUPS – ACCUSING UNILEVER OF TRYING TO INTIMIDATE ITS PERSONNEL INTO SILENCE.

AT THE HEART OF THE DISPUTE IS BEN & JERRY’S INDEPENDENT BOARD, A UNIQUE ARRANGEMENT THAT HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE UNILEVER ACQUIRED THE COMPANY IN 2000. THE BOARD WAS ESTABLISHED TO ENSURE THE ICE CREAM BRAND COULD CONTINUE ITS ACTIVISM.

BUT NOW, BEN & JERRY’S SAYS UNILEVER HAS ATTEMPTED TO DISMANTLE THAT BOARD AND SHUT DOWN ITS EFFORTS TO SPEAK OUT ON SOCIAL ISSUES – INCLUDING PRO-PALESTINIAN MESSAGING DURING THE ONGOING ISRAEL-HAMAS CONFLICT.

THE LAWSUIT INCLUDES SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF UNILEVER REPORTEDLY BLOCKING BEN & JERRY’S FROM TAKING A STAND.

IN DECEMBER 2023, BEN & JERRY’S SOUGHT TO RELEASE A STATEMENT CALLING FOR A CEASEFIRE IN GAZA. BUT THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES UNILEVER THREATENED TO BREAK UP THE BOARD IF THE BRAND ISSUED THE STATEMENT.

IN 2024, TENSIONS CONTINUED. 

IN MAY, BEN & JERRY’S WANTED TO TWEET IN SUPPORT OF PALESTINIAN SAFE PASSAGE TO THE UK, BUT UNILEVER BLOCKED THAT TOO, ALLEGEDLY SAYING IT WAS INAPPROPRIATE GIVEN CURRENT EVENTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST WHICH INCLUDED AN IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACK ON ISRAEL AT THE TIME.

THE FOLLOWING MONTH, BEN & JERRY’S ATTEMPTED TO RELEASE A STATEMENT BACKING STUDENT PROTESTS OVER CIVILIAN DEATHS IN GAZA—ONLY TO BE ALLEGEDLY STOPPED AGAIN.

AND IN SEPTEMBER, THE LAWSUIT SAYS UNILEVER BLOCKED BEN & JERRY’S FROM SUPPORTING LEGISLATION INTRODUCED BY SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS THAT WOULD HAVE STOPPED U.S. WEAPON SALES TO ISRAEL.

THE ICE CREAM BRAND SAYS UNILEVER BLOCKED DONATIONS TO ORGANIZATIONS LIKE “JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE” AND THE “COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS” – UNILEVER CITING CONCERNS OVER THE ORGANIZATIONS’ ANTI-ISRAEL STANCES.

BEN AND JERRY’S ALSO SUED ITS PARENT COMPANY BACK IN 2021 TO PREVENT ICE CREAM SALES IN JEWISH SETTLEMENTS IN THE WEST BANK.

UNILEVER PREVIOUSLY SAID THAT THE COMPANY WANTS TO STAY “NEUTRAL” ON THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT.

UNILEVER HAS REJECTED THE ACCUSATIONS IN BEN AND JERRY’S LAWSUIT, SAYING IT WILL DEFEND ITSELF “VERY STRONGLY” IN COURT.

THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.

FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU.

DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP.

OR FIND US ONLINE. AT SAN DOT COM.