Skip to main content
U.S.

Chokehold technique scrutinized in Jordan Neely death case

Share

More information came to light during the trial of Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old Marine veteran charged in the death of Jordan Neely. Key testimony came from Penny’s Marine combat instructor, giving further information on the chokehold technique used in the fatal subway encounter.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 25% Center 75% Right 0%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Marine instructor Joseph Caballer testified about the “blood choke,” a maneuver taught in combat training to render a person unconscious by cutting off blood flow to the brain within seconds.

Caballer explained that while effective when applied correctly, holding the choke too long can lead to serious injury or death. He noted that Marines are trained to release the hold immediately once the subject is unconscious.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Penny faces charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide after placing Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, in a chokehold during a May 2023 incident on a Manhattan subway. Penny, who has pleaded not guilty, claims he acted to protect passengers from Neely, whom he described as threatening and aggressive.

Video evidence shows Penny restraining Neely on the subway floor for several minutes, even after Neely stopped moving. Caballer’s testimony suggested Penny’s technique may have shifted during the struggle.

He described how a blood choke could unintentionally become an “air choke,” which applies pressure to the trachea and takes longer to render a person unconscious.

Caballer emphasized that improper or prolonged application of either hold can turn a non-lethal restraint into a fatal one. NYC Medical Examiner Dr. Cynthia Harris testified that Neely’s death resulted from “compression of the neck,” with “chokehold” listed as the cause on the death certificate.

Penny’s defense attorneys argued that Neely’s preexisting health issues and potential substance use may have contributed to his death. They also suggested that Penny did not apply consistent pressure throughout the incident.

Eric Gonzalez, a witness to the encounter, testified that he urged Penny to release Neely, offering to help restrain the man’s hands. Gonzalez stated that Penny ignored his suggestion and continued the hold even after Neely stopped resisting. During a police interview, Penny told detectives he had no intention of harming Neely and acted out of concern for passenger safety.

The trial has drawn significant public attention, sparking debates about public safety, self-defense, and the use of force in confrontations involving mental health issues.

If convicted, Penny faces up to 15 years in prison.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[Craig Nigrelli]

THIS WEEK, THE TRIAL OF DANIEL PENNY, A 26-YEAR-OLD MARINE VETERAN CHARGED IN THE DEATH OF JORDAN NEELY, FEATURED KEY TESTIMONY FROM PENNY’S MARINE COMBAT INSTRUCTOR, SHEDDING LIGHT ON THE CHOKEHOLD TECHNIQUE USED IN THE FATAL 2023 SUBWAY ENCOUNTER.

MARINE INSTRUCTOR JOSEPH CABALLER TESTIFIED ABOUT THE “BLOOD CHOKE,” A MANEUVER TAUGHT IN COMBAT TRAINING TO RENDER A PERSON UNCONSCIOUS BY CUTTING OFF BLOOD FLOW TO THE BRAIN WITHIN SECONDS.

PENNY IS FACING CHARGES OF MANSLAUGHTER AND CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE FOR HIS ACTIONS ON A NEW YORK SUBWAY. HE HAS PLEADED NOT GUILTY, STATING THAT HE ACTED TO PROTECT PASSENGERS FROM NEELY, WHOM HE DESCRIBED AS THREATENING AND AGGRESSIVE.

VIDEO EVIDENCE SHOWS PENNY RESTRAINING NEELY ON A SUBWAY TRAIN FLOOR FOR SEVERAL MINUTES, EVEN AFTER NEELY STOPPED MOVING. CABALLER’S TESTIMONY SUGGESTED PENNY’S TECHNIQUE MAY HAVE SHIFTED DURING THE STRUGGLE. HE DESCRIBED HOW A BLOOD CHOKE COULD UNINTENTIONALLY BECOME AN “AIR CHOKE,” WHICH APPLIES PRESSURE TO THE TRACHEA AND TAKES LONGER TO RENDER A PERSON UNCONSCIOUS.

HE NOTED THAT PROLONGED OR INCORRECT APPLICATION OF A ‘BLOOD CHOKE’ COULD TURN A NON-LETHAL HOLD INTO A FATAL ONE.

DURING A POLICE INTERVIEW, PENNY TOLD DETECTIVES HE HAD NO INTENTION OF HARMING NEELY AND WAS FOCUSED ON PREVENTING HIM FROM INJURING OTHERS.

A WITNESS, ERIC GONZALEZ, TESTIFIED THAT HE URGED PENNY TO RELEASE NEELY, OFFERING TO HELP RESTRAIN THE MAN’S HANDS. GONZALEZ SAID PENNY IGNORED THE SUGGESTION AND CONTINUED THE CHOKEHOLD.

THE MEDICAL EXAMINER WHO PERFORMED NEELY’S AUTOPSY TESTIFIED THAT HIS DEATH RESULTED FROM “COMPRESSION OF THE NECK,” IDENTIFYING THE CHOKEHOLD AS THE PRIMARY CAUSE.

PENNY’S DEFENSE ATTORNEYS DISPUTE THAT CLAIM, ARGUING THAT NEELY’S EXISTING HEALTH ISSUES AND POSSIBLE SUBSTANCE USE MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO HIS DEATH. THEY ALSO SUGGESTED THAT PENNY DID NOT APPLY CONSISTENT PRESSURE THROUGHOUT THE INCIDENT.

THE CASE SPARKED DEBATE ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY, SELF-DEFENSE, AND THE USE OF FORCE IN CONFRONTATIONS INVOLVING MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES.

IF CONVICTED, PENNY COULD FACE UP TO 15 YEARS IN PRISON.

FOR MORE OF OUR UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING – BE SURE TO DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY, OR LOG ON TO SAN.COM.