Skip to main content
Business

Elon Musk says he’ll drop his $97 billion OpenAI bid on one condition

Listen
Share

  • Elon Musk said he will drop his offer to buy OpenAI if the company maintains its nonprofit status. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called the offer itself “ridiculous,” saying the company is not for sale.
  • Musk cofounded the company alongside Altman and others, but since leaving, the relationship has been contentious and litigious.
  • If Musk’s offer isn’t withdrawn, OpenAI’s board will need to consider its value.

Full Story

Elon Musk’s investor group claims it will withdraw its $97.4 billion bid to buy ChatGPT-maker OpenAI if OpenAI drops its plan to shift to a for-profit model. However, the company said it’s not for sale and called the offer “an improper bid to undermine a competitor.”

Media Landscape

See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn more
Left 27% Center 50% Right 23%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“If OpenAI, Inc.’s Board is prepared to preserve the charity’s mission and stipulate to take the ‘for sale’ sign off its assets by halting its conversion, Musk will withdraw the bid,” lawyers for Musk wrote in a court filing late Wednesday, Feb. 12. 

“OpenAI is meant to be [an] open-source nonprofit, and now it is closed,” Musk said during a virtual appearance at the World Governments Summit in Dubai early Thursday, Feb. 13. “They changed the name to closed for maximum profit, AI closed for voracious profit.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

A consortium led by Musk put in the offer to buy the AI heavyweight on Monday, Feb. 10. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman indicated he never took it seriously. 

“It’s ridiculous,” Altman said on the sidelines of the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris. “The company is not for sale. It’s like another one of his tactics to try to mess with us.”

The Musk-Altman feud over OpenAI goes back years

Musk cofounded OpenAI and said he provided the first $50 million of the company’s funding. Musk eventually left the company after disagreeing with his co-founders about the future direction of the company. 

“OpenAI has gotten this far while having at least a sort of dual profit, nonprofit role,” Musk said Thursday. “What they’re trying to do now is completely delete the nonprofit, and that seems really going too far.”

“I provided all of the funding for opening at the beginning, for the first almost $50 million for nothing, for a nonprofit, and it was meant to be open source,” he continued. “I think this is analogous too. If you fund a nonprofit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead, they turn into a lumber company and chop down the trees and sell them for wood, you’ll be like, ‘Wait a second, that’s the exact opposite of what I donated the money for.’”

What are OpenAI’s for-profit plans?

Since its founding in 2015, the AI innovator has been a nonprofit. In 2019, the company added a “capped profit” arm that was still controlled by the nonprofit’s board of directors. Musk twice sued OpenAI for branching out into the profit business, most recently in August 2024.

The next month, it was reported Altman was working to restructure into a for-profit company. The transition would eliminate the nonprofit arm’s control over the for-profit business.

“The nonprofit will continue as a very, very strong thing,” Altman told reporters in Paris this week. “The mission is really important, and we’re totally focused on making sure we preserve that.”

Altman conceded OpenAI “should probably open source somewhat more.”

In December 2024, OpenAI challenged Musk’s claims of AI altruism. The company said in a blog post that Elon Musk years ago wanted to make OpenAI for-profit.

During an interview at The New York Times’ Dealbook Summit, Altman also claimed it moved toward a for-profit model after Musk decided to stop funding the company as a nonprofit.

If Musk’s offer to buy OpenAI remains on the docket, OpenAI’s board will need to consider the offer and its value. That is because in order to turn OpenAI into a for-profit endeavor, Altman essentially needs to buy out the nonprofit arm’s controlling interest.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Simone Del Rosario:

Elon Musk says he’ll withdraw a $97 billion bid to buy ChatGPT-maker OpenAI … if the company stops shifting its business to a for-profit entity.

Elon Musk:

So open AI is meant to be open source nonprofit, and now it is closed. They changed the name to closed for maximum profit. Ai closed for voracious profit.

Simone Del Rosario:

In a court filing, Musk’s lawyers wrote…

“If OpenAI, Inc.’s Board is prepared to preserve the charity’s mission and stipulate to take the ‘for sale’ sign off its assets by halting its conversion, Musk will withdraw the bid.”

It’s a bid OpenAI CEO Sam Altman never took seriously.

Sam Altman:

“It’s ridiculous. Yeah, how so what? The company is not for sale. The company is not for sale. It’s like another one of his, you know, tactics to try to, like, mess with us. ”
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CDzXcBp6Kq_aPTEuB0cK4vRf6utAJg0Y/view?usp=drive_link

“No. OpenAI has a mission. We are an unusual organization and we have this mission of making AGI benefit all of humanity, and we are here to do that.”

Simone Del Rosario:

Elon Musk co-founded the company and says he provided the first $50 million of the company’s funding. Years later, Musk left the company after disagreeing with other founders about OpenAI’s future. Since then, the relationship has become contentious … and litigious.

Sam Altman:

This is a tremendously sad I grew up with Elon as like a mega hero. I thought what Elon was doing was absolutely incredible for the world. And I’m still, of course, I mean, I have different feelings about now, but I’m still glad he exists, and not, not just because, no, I mean that genuinely, not, not just because I think his like companies are awesome, which I do think, but because I think he like at a time when most of the world was not thinking very ambitiously.He pushed a lot of people, me included, to think much more ambitiously.

Simone Del Rosario:

Since its founding in 2015, the AI innovator has been a nonprofit. In 2019, they added a “capped profit” arm that was still controlled by the nonprofit’s board of directors.

Musk twice sued OpenAI for branching out into the profit business, most recently in August.

In September, it came out that CEO Sam Altman is working to restructure the company into a for-profit endeavor. That would eliminate the nonprofit arm’s control over the for-profit business.

Musk is attempting to stand in the way of that transition. OpenAI now he’s contradicted his own suit by making “an improper bid to undermine a competitor.”

Elon Musk:

OpenAI has gotten this far while having at least a sort of dual profit, nonprofit role. What they’re trying to do now is completely delete the nonprofit and and, and that seems really going too far. You know, the I provided all of the funding for opening at the beginning, for the first almost $50 million for nothing, for as a nonprofit, and it was meant to be open source. And so, you know, I think this is analogous to, like, if you pay, but if you find a nonprofit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but then they, but instead, they turn into a lumber companies and chop down the trees and sell them for wood. You’ll be like, wait a second, that’s the exact opposite of what I paid, what I donated the money for.

Sam Altman:

the nonprofit will continue as a very, very strong thing. The mission is really important, and we’re just, you know, we’re totally focused on making sure we preserve that.

Sam Altman:

I think OpenAI has done the most to push the benefits of AI into the world of anyone. We have open source a lot of things. I think we should probably open source somewhat more. We’ll probably do that. Grock is not super open source either. But, you know, that’s not that’s up to him.

Simone Del Rosario:

In December of last year, OpenAI challenged Musk’s claims of AI altruism. In a blog post, the company said Elon Musk years ago wanted to make OpenAI for-profit.

Sam Altman:

It became clear after GPT one and some other work that we were going to need to scale. And we started, and also Elon decided to stop funding us as a nonprofit, and we couldn’t get somebody else to do it, that we needed to find a way to make a capped profit.

Simone Del Rosario:

Musk’s offer does throw a wrench in the company’s transition. Aside from having to keep its lawyers toiling away in the courts, OpenAI’s board needs to consider the offer – and its value – if it remains on the table.

That’s because Altman basically needs to buy out the nonprofit arm’s controlling interest to turn it into a for-profit model.

The drama is unfolding while OpenAI works on its latest fundraising round. Japan’s Softbank is reportedly looking at investing up to $40 billion, which would push OpenAI’s valuation up to around $300 billion, according to the New York Times.