Skip to main content
Energy

EPA mulls EV transition delay amid pushback from lawmakers, automakers

Share

A bipartisan rally in Ohio on Thursday, Feb. 22, highlighted growing opposition to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed emissions standards. These regulations aim to mandate that two-thirds of new vehicles sold in the U.S. be electric by 2032. However, the rules have drawn criticism from lawmakers and autoworkers who argue that the timeline is overly ambitious.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“It’ll be devastating for working class people because it’s going to cost them their jobs, it’s going to mandate that they buy electric vehicles, which are much more expensive and a lot less reliable for the things that they need to do to live and work every day,” Ohio Lt. Gov. Jon Husted said. “You see that this is a bipartisan group of people who are saying no to the Biden administration’s EPA mandates that would mandate 67% of cars be electric by 2032, which means that industry has to start immediately changing.”

In addition to the demonstration in Ohio, over 130 members of Congress have penned a letter to President Joe Biden and EPA Director Michael Reagan, expressing concerns from both sides of the aisle about the feasibility of the emissions plan.

“We write to highlight the failures of this Administration’s hasty and costly transition to electric vehicles,” the group of lawmakers wrote. “This rule is contradictory to all conventional predictions about where the automobile industry is headed in the coming years, including this administration’s own Department of Energy.”

The congressional members contend that the proposed regulations are “unrealistic” and “absurd.” The letter argues this rule could have adverse effects on American families and businesses, while potentially increasing reliance on foreign markets, particularly China. The lawmakers also pointed to federal energy reports which predict that only one out of five new vehicles will be EVs by 2050.

Amid this pushback, reports indicate that the EPA is considering delaying the implementation of the emissions plan until after 2030 to allow automakers more time to comply. Under this revised timeline, regulations would ramp up sharply to achieve the goal of EVs comprising 67% of U.S. new car sales by 2032 and create roughly the same greenhouse gas reductions as the original proposal by 2055.

The initial plan, which would have begun impacting vehicles manufactured in 2027, prompted major automakers like Ford, Stellantis, and General Motors, along with the United Auto Workers union, to request a deadline extension.

However, environmental advocates argue that delaying the implementation of this intuitive comes with risks of its own.

Dan Becker, the director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, told The Washington Post that waiting until 2030 will result in “more pollution, more sick kids, more global warming, [and] more oil use.”

Organizations like the Sierra Club have urged the EPA to move forward with its original plan, emphasizing the detrimental effects of air pollution on public health.

These groups say that over 137 million Americans, more than one-third of the nation’s population, are currently exposed to harmful levels of air pollution, which stricter emissions standards could help alleviate in the short term.

“We need strong clean car standards to deliver vital relief that the most highly impacted communities demand and deserve,” the Sierra Club wrote. “The United States is the world’s second largest country emitter, and transportation is the largest portion (29%) of total US greenhouse gas emissions.”

A decision on what these regulations will ultimately look like has not been made yet. The EPA’s final ruling on emissions regulations is expected by March at the earliest.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

[Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost] 

[JACK ALYMER]
THIS RALLY IN OHIO – JUST ONE OF THE LATEST EXAMPLES OF PUSH BACK TO THE FEDERAL AGENCY’S NEW PROPOSED EMISSIONS STANDARDS.

THESE STANDARDS WOULD ESSENTIALLY REQUIRE TWO-THIRDS OF NEW VEHICLES SOLD IN THE U.S. TO BE ELECTRIC BY 20-32.

IT’S A PLAN LAWMAKERS AND AUTOWORKERS SAY IS TOO MUCH TOO FAST.

[Ohio Lt. Governor Jon Husted]

“It’ll be devastating for working class people because it’s going to cost them their jobs, it’s going to mandate that they buy electric vehicles, which are much more expensive and a lot less reliable for the things that they need to do to live and work every day.”

[JACK ALYMER]

THIS DEMONSTRATION IN OHIO ISN’T THE ONLY VOCAL OPPOSITION TO THE EPA.

MORE THAN ONE-HUNDRED-AND-THIRTY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WROTE A LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN AND EPA DIRECTOR MICHAEL REAGAN.

IN IT, THE BIPARTISAN GROUP SAYS THIS EMISSIONS PLAN IS UNREALISTIC AND ABSURD.

THEY BELIEVE IT WILL HARM AMERICAN FAMILIES AND BUSINESSES, WHILE MAKING THE NATION MORE RELIANT ON CHINA.

LAWMAKERS ALSO POINTED TO RECENT FEDERAL ENERGY REPORTS – WHICH PREDICT ONLY 1 OUT OF 5 NEW VEHICLES WILL BE AN E-V BY 20-50.

NOW WE’RE LEARNING THE EPA MAY ALTER COURSE.

THE AGENCY IS CONSIDERING DELAYING THEIR EMISSIONS PLAN UNTIL AFTER 20-30 AS A WAY OF GIVING AUTOMAKERS MORE TIME TO COMPLY.

REGULATIONS WOULD THEN SHARPLY INCREASE TO HIT THAT GOAL OF ALL ELECTRIC VEHICLES MAKING UP 67 PERCENT OF U.S. NEW CAR SALES COME 20-32.

THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL WOULD HAVE FIRST STARTED IMPACTING VEHICLES MADE IN 20-27, PROMPTING FORD, STELLANTIS, GM, AND THE UNITED AUTO WORKERS UNION TO ASK FOR A DEADLINE EXTENSION.

THIS REVISED PLAN WOULD STILL ACHIEVE ROUGHLY THE SAME GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTIONS AS THE ORIGINAL ONE BY 20-55.

BUT ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES ARGUE THERE’S NO TIME TO WASTE, AND PUSHING BACK THE TIMELINE WILL RESULT IN HAZARDS OF ITS OWN.

[DAN BECKER]

“More oil use, more pollution, more global warming, and more kids with asthma. So that’s a bad deal.”

[JACK ALYMER]

THE SIERRA CLUB HAS ALSO CALLED ON THE EPA TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ITS INITIAL PLAN.

THEY SAY MORE THAN 137 MILLION AMERICANS, OVER A THIRD OF THE NATION’S TOTAL POPULATION, ARE CURRENTLY LIVING WITH HARMFUL LEVELS OF AIR POLLUTION.

A PROBLEM STRICTER EMISSIONS STANDARDS IN THE SHORT TERM COULD HELP ADDRESS.

A DECISION ON WHAT THESE REGULATIONS WILL ULTIMATELY LOOK hasn’t been made yet.

A FINAL RULING ON EMISSIONS REGULATIONS is expected by MARCH AT THE EARLIEST.